Chris van der Pennen wrote:
On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 18:30, MAL wrote:
/MAL wrote:
Append the runlevel name (number in other distros) to the kernel line at
boot.
Like when you boot single user mode by appending 'single'.
So to solve Jan's problem, create a new directory in /etc/runlevels
called
On Sat, 2003-06-21 at 19:12, MAL wrote:
Chris van der Pennen wrote:
On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 18:30, MAL wrote:
/MAL wrote:
Append the runlevel name (number in other distros) to the kernel line at
boot.
Like when you boot single user mode by appending 'single'.
So to solve Jan's
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 02:37:14AM +0200, Sebastian Hungerecker wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003 01:29:04 +0100
Jan Drugowitsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would anyone know a better possibility to do this without
modifying scripts
Create a second runlevel and add all services to it, which are in
On Friday 20 June 2003 01:37, Sebastian Hungerecker wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003 01:29:04 +0100
Jan Drugowitsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would anyone know a better possibility to do this without
modifying scripts
Create a second runlevel and add all services to it, which are in the
current
On 20/6/03 8:59 am, Ohad Lutzky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 02:37:14AM +0200, Sebastian Hungerecker wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003 01:29:04 +0100
Jan Drugowitsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Create a second runlevel and add all services to it, which are in the
current runlevel
On 20/6/03 1:37 am, Sebastian Hungerecker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003 01:29:04 +0100
Jan Drugowitsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would anyone know a better possibility to do this without
modifying scripts
Create a second runlevel and add all services to it, which are in the
Stroller wrote:
On 20/6/03 1:37 am, Sebastian Hungerecker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003 01:29:04 +0100
Jan Drugowitsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would anyone know a better possibility to do this without
modifying scripts
Create a second runlevel and add all services to it, which are
MAL wrote:
Append the runlevel name (number in other distros) to the kernel line at
boot.
Like when you boot single user mode by appending 'single'.
So to solve Jan's problem, create a new directory in /etc/runlevels
called 'graphical'
rc-update add xdm graphical
rc-update del xdm default
The kernel parameter is definitely a good way to go, but then does any
package tamper with your runlevel setting? i doubt that, as that would be
very rude... hey its my system right? but i gess its better to make
certain... i'll have to check back on that.
There is another way i know though
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003 09:44:43 +0100
Stroller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20/6/03 8:59 am, Ohad Lutzky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 02:37:14AM +0200, Sebastian Hungerecker
wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003 01:29:04 +0100
Jan Drugowitsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Create a
On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 18:30, MAL wrote:
MAL wrote:
Append the runlevel name (number in other distros) to the kernel line at
boot.
Like when you boot single user mode by appending 'single'.
So to solve Jan's problem, create a new directory in /etc/runlevels
called 'graphical'
Hi everyone!
My default configuration to start gentoo (using GRUB) right now is by directly
starting xdm (actually kdm, logging in as default user). However, sometimes
it would be nice to boot without directing starting the GUI.
Would it be possible to add a GRUB entry to start gentoo without
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003 01:29:04 +0100
Jan Drugowitsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would anyone know a better possibility to do this without
modifying scripts
Create a second runlevel and add all services to it, which are in the
current runlevel except xdm. Then add an entry to grub, which boots in
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 2:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Starting gentoo without xdm
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003 01:29:04 +0100
Jan Drugowitsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would anyone know a better possibility to do this without
14 matches
Mail list logo
