Hi there,
I'm getting the following when trying to do a genkernel --udev
--gensplash=gentoo all:
Root device is (3, 4)
Boot sector 512 bytes.
Setup is 4896 bytes.
System is 7985 kB
System is too big. Try using modules.
make[1]: *** [arch/x86_64/boot/bzImage] Error 1
make: *** [bzImage] Error 2
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:46:17 +0100, Bastian Balthazar Bux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jose Gonzalez Gomez ha scritto:
Hi there,
I'm getting the following when trying to do a genkernel --udev
--gensplash=gentoo all:
Root device is (3, 4)
Boot sector 512 bytes.
Setup is 4896 bytes.
Jose Gonzalez Gomez ha scritto:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:46:17 +0100, Bastian Balthazar Bux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jose Gonzalez Gomez ha scritto:
Hi there,
I'm getting the following when trying to do a genkernel --udev
--gensplash=gentoo all:
Root device is (3, 4)
Boot sector 512 bytes.
Setup is
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 17:25:08 +0100, Bastian Balthazar Bux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jose Gonzalez Gomez ha scritto:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:46:17 +0100, Bastian Balthazar Bux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jose Gonzalez Gomez ha scritto:
Hi there,
I'm getting the following when trying to do
Jose Gonzalez Gomez ha scritto:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 17:25:08 +0100, Bastian Balthazar Bux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jose Gonzalez Gomez ha scritto:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:46:17 +0100, Bastian Balthazar Bux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jose Gonzalez Gomez ha scritto:
Hi there,
I'm getting the
Bastian Balthazar Bux wrote:
System is 7365 kB
System is too big. Try using modules.
make[1]: *** [arch/x86_64/boot/bzImage] Error 1
make: *** [bzImage] Error 2
* Gentoo Linux Genkernel; Version 3.1.0j
* ERROR: Failed to compile the bzImage target...
Why don't you just compile it yourself rather
On Tuesday 22 February 2005 21:45, Chris Cox wrote:
Bastian Balthazar Bux wrote:
System is 7365 kB
System is too big. Try using modules.
make[1]: *** [arch/x86_64/boot/bzImage] Error 1
make: *** [bzImage] Error 2
* Gentoo Linux Genkernel; Version 3.1.0j
* ERROR: Failed to compile
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Tuesday 22 February 2005 21:45, Chris Cox wrote:
Bastian Balthazar Bux wrote:
System is 7365 kB
System is too big. Try using modules.
make[1]: *** [arch/x86_64/boot/bzImage] Error 1
make: *** [bzImage] Error 2
* Gentoo Linux Genkernel; Version 3.1.0j
* ERROR:
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
pssst. Do not tell them, that compiling 2.6 with make all modules_install
install is better than genkernel ;) Why use the 'normal' way, if you can do
it with a complex script, that needs a big overhead and makes your boot
longer?
unfortunately, it seems that the only
On Tuesday 22 February 2005 22:39, Chris Cox wrote:
Well for me I tried that Genkernel way a couple of times and thought
it was way too complex and took too long. That is, when it worked
which most of the time it never did. Seems it wants to compile
everything including the kitchen sink when
Eric S. Johansson wrote:
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
pssst. Do not tell them, that compiling 2.6 with make all
modules_install install is better than genkernel ;) Why use the
'normal' way, if you can do it with a complex script, that needs a
big overhead and makes your boot longer?
Eric S. Johansson wrote:
unfortunately, it seems that the only way to get lvm2 and udev to work
at the same time is with genkernel. personally, I would love to find an
alternative but my query on how to has only had one answer which is to
give up.
---eric
I've never used genkernel, and
Holly Bostick wrote:
I've never used genkernel, and I had lvm2 and udev working perfectly
well together-- do you have the root partition on LVM or something (I
didn't)?
no.
Even so, that's related to initrd generation, which is not the exclusive
province of genkernel.
I'm confused.
so am I
Eric S. Johansson ha scritto:
Holly Bostick wrote:
I've never used genkernel, and I had lvm2 and udev working perfectly
well together-- do you have the root partition on LVM or something (I
didn't)?
no.
Even so, that's related to initrd generation, which is not the
exclusive province of
Eric S. Johansson wrote:
Holly Bostick wrote:
I've never used genkernel, and I had lvm2 and udev working perfectly
well together-- do you have the root partition on LVM or something (I
didn't)?
no.
Even so, that's related to initrd generation, which is not the
exclusive province of genkernel.
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 17:04:38 -0500, Eric S. Johansson wrote:
unfortunately, it seems that the only way to get lvm2 and udev to work
at the same time is with genkernel. personally, I would love to find an
alternative but my query on how to has only had one answer which is to
LVM, software
Holly Bostick wrote:
[disclaimer] OK, I have no idea what Xen is,
only the hottest little virtual machine system around.
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/Research/SRG/netos/xen/index.html
and I have no idea what
documentation you are reading that says you need an initrd[/disclaimer],
Hi
On Tuesday 22 February 2005 22:39, Chris Cox wrote:
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
Well for me I tried that Genkernel way a couple of times and thought it
was way too complex and took too long. That is, when it worked which
most of the time it never did. Seems it wants to compile
Eric S. Johansson wrote:
Holly Bostick wrote:
and I have no idea what documentation you are reading that says you
need an initrd[/disclaimer],
http://webpages.charter.net/decibelshelp/LinuxHelp_UDEVPrimer.html
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/udev-guide.xml
have been the main documents I've been
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 00:35:59 +0100, Holly Bostick wrote:
As far as I know, as long as you have device-mapper loaded before udev
starts, it should find them fine (i.e., udev is not in and of itself an
issue, to the best of my knowledge).
udev starts before modules are loaded, so
Holly Bostick wrote:
As far as I know, as long as you have device-mapper loaded before udev
starts, it should find them fine (i.e., udev is not in and of itself an
issue, to the best of my knowledge).
How are you loading device-mapper?
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_DM=y
rebuilt the kernel with lvm and
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 19:04:52 -0500, Eric S. Johansson wrote:
rebuilt the kernel with lvm and device-mapper built-in.
I reboot, I get the same thing I have every time. /etc/dm* doesn't exist
which makes sense because my raid set /dev/md0 seems to have vanished.
Are the partitions comprising
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 19:04:52 -0500, Eric S. Johansson wrote:
rebuilt the kernel with lvm and device-mapper built-in.
I reboot, I get the same thing I have every time. /etc/dm* doesn't exist
which makes sense because my raid set /dev/md0 seems to have vanished.
Are the
Maybe all that complicated junk is if you want to put root on an LVM.
I've only done one LVM2 so far on FC2/3 and it worked fine but I left
/boot and /root off the LVM - it wasn't part of it. I' have a system that
I'm going to install Gentoo on and use LVM2 and udev so Holly's experience
is
LVM the gentoo way works fine: I highly recommend for any system needing
multiple partitions
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/lvm2.xml
After a disk failure (one of a two disk raid zero stripe), I added the
new disk as LVM2, copied the files that I could salvage over and then
did an emerge -e world
On Tuesday 22 February 2005 04:19 pm, Chris Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Sorry I can't help you on the lvm2 problem. Never used that
filesystem. I assume that its another filesystem , like reiserfs or
ext3? Or maybe its something complex like RAID?
LVM is at the same level of abstraction
On Tuesday 22 February 2005 04:54 pm, Bastian Balthazar Bux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you don't use lvm for / /usr and similar you don't need an initrd at
all. Built it in the kernel or as a module and let the gentoo init
scripts manage it.
IME, LVM /usr does not require an initrd.
--
27 matches
Mail list logo
