> Look back at his fstab. He has his partitions listed as hd1, hd3 etc.
> shouldn't it read hda1,hda3 etc?
Yes, someone caught that earlier, but the kernel wasn't even getting
that far. I'd left out something that needed to be linked in statically.
I started over with /proc/config from the liveCD
On Thursday 05 June 2003 02:56 pm, Peter Ruskin wrote:
> On Thursday 05 Jun 2003 19:40, Mark Knecht wrote:
> > It's a total guess as I've seen something similar to this on
> > Redhat, although not with ext2 partitions. Is the 03:03 part a
> > clue? Is that saying something like it's looking for /de
> IIRC the /proc/config exist on the livecd
>
Thanks for all the suggestions, I finally got it to work. I took your
advice and did:
cat /proc/config > /mnt/gentoo/usr/src/linux/.config
chroot /mnt/gentoo /bin/bash
source /etc/profile
cd /usr/src/linux
make menuconfig
make dep && make clean bzIma
>
> > Rats! This reminded me that I had the same problem at some point
> > because of multiple controllers. I changed /dev/hda? to /dev/hde?
> > and things went just fine. I think that it was loading the controller
> > card before the on-board controller. Could this be a possibility?
> >
> >
You did build IDE RAID support in?
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 14:25:31 -0400 (EDT)
Chris Bare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I looked back at your original e-mail, and I'll be
durned if I
can see what might be wrong. Sorry I can't help.
I have a feeling I've left something out of the kernel
that should b
>
>I don't think it could be in my case, I don't have any extra
>controllers. I do have USB and 1394, but no devices plugged
>in. I wonder
>if they could cause a problem?
nah. I wouldn't think that this would be a problem. Given that
the bootcd loads the drive as /dev/hda would tend to negate
m
> Rats! This reminded me that I had the same problem at some point
> because of multiple controllers. I changed /dev/hda? to /dev/hde?
> and things went just fine. I think that it was loading the controller
> card before the on-board controller. Could this be a possibility?
>
> -rex
>
I don'
>It's a total guess as I've seen something similar to this on Redhat,
>although not with ext2 partitions. Is the 03:03 part a clue?
>Is that saying
>something like it's looking for /dev/hdd? I might have
>expected it to say
>00:03.
>
>In my case it was getting confused about my specific EIDE
>co
On Thursday 05 Jun 2003 19:40, Mark Knecht wrote:
> It's a total guess as I've seen something similar to this on Redhat,
> although not with ext2 partitions. Is the 03:03 part a clue? Is that
> saying something like it's looking for /dev/hdd? I might have
> expected it to say 00:03.
Sorry Mark, 03
> I've installed gentoo successfully several times before, but this time
> I'm getting the following when I try to boot the first time:
>
> VFS: Cannot open root device "hda3" or 03:03
>
It's a total guess as I've seen something similar to this on Redhat,
although not with ext2 partitions. Is the
On Thursday 05 June 2003 18:52, Chris Bare wrote:
> > --Boundary-02=_dX33+ZQii2HZ2Fm
> > Content-Type: text/plain;
> > charset="iso-8859-1"
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> > Content-Description: signed data
> > Content-Disposition: inline
> >
> > On Thursday 05 June 2003 17:44,
IIRC the /proc/config exist on the livecd
On tor, 2003-06-05 at 18:29, Chris Bare wrote:
> >
> > diff with a working kernel? ;)
> >
>
> The only working one I have at the moment is the liveCD. What's weird is
> I've installed gentoo at least 2 other times on this exact same hardware
> and never
>
> diff with a working kernel? ;)
>
The only working one I have at the moment is the liveCD. What's weird is
I've installed gentoo at least 2 other times on this exact same hardware
and never had this problem. Maybe I got a newer kernel source this time.
--
Chris Bare
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
[E
diff with a working kernel? ;)
On tor, 2003-06-05 at 18:25, Chris Bare wrote:
> > I looked back at your original e-mail, and I'll be durned if I
> > can see what might be wrong. Sorry I can't help.
> >
>
> I have a feeling I've left something out of the kernel that should be
> built in statical
> I looked back at your original e-mail, and I'll be durned if I
> can see what might be wrong. Sorry I can't help.
>
I have a feeling I've left something out of the kernel that should be
built in statically, but I haven't spotted the problem yet.
--
Chris Bare
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
[EMAIL PRO
>thanks for spotting that. I've fixed it, but I had it right in
>grub. The
>problem is before it even managed to get to fstab.
>
I looked back at your original e-mail, and I'll be durned if I
can see what might be wrong. Sorry I can't help.
-rex
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
> I think that if you double-check things, you will find that you
> do not have /dev/hd1, /dev/hd2 nor /dev/hd3. You probably have
> /dev/hda1, /dev/hda2 and /dev/hda3. Not that there is an "a" added
> between the numeral and the letter "d". Hope it helps.
>
thanks for spotting that. I've fixe
>
>/etc/fstab from the root I can't mount:
>
>/dev/hd1/boot ext2
>noauto,noatime 1 1
>/dev/hd3/ reiserfs
>noatime 0 0
>/dev/hd2noneswapsw
> 0 0
>/dev/cdroms/cdr
>
> --Boundary-02=_dX33+ZQii2HZ2Fm
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> Content-Description: signed data
> Content-Disposition: inline
>
> On Thursday 05 June 2003 17:44, Chris Bare wrote:
> > > Did you have /boot mounted when you co
On Thursday 05 June 2003 17:44, Chris Bare wrote:
> > Did you have /boot mounted when you copied bzImage to it?
>
> yes.
could you post your fstab and fdisk output, also the output of mount from the
livecd with it mounted?
--
Tom Wesley
Please encrypt personal replies if possible.
pgp0.pg
Hmm, for some reason it can't mount the root device.
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 12:44:11 -0400 (EDT)
Chris Bare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Did you have /boot mounted when you copied bzImage to
it?
yes.
--
Chris Bare
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing lis
>
> Did you have /boot mounted when you copied bzImage to it?
>
yes.
--
Chris Bare
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Did you have /boot mounted when you copied bzImage to it?
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 12:40:09 -0400 (EDT)
Chris Bare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've installed gentoo successfully several times before,
but this time
I'm getting the following when I try to boot the first
time:
VFS: Cannot open root devi
I've installed gentoo successfully several times before, but this time
I'm getting the following when I try to boot the first time:
VFS: Cannot open root device "hda3" or 03:03
I have the following in my grub.conf:
title=Gentoo
root (hd0,0)
kernel (hd0,0)/boot/bzImage root=/de
try root(hd0,2)
badenIT GmbH
System Support Workstation
Chris Meidinger
Tullastrasse 70
79108 Freiburg
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Chris Bare [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet am: Donnerstag, 5. Juni 2003 17:40
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: [gent
25 matches
Mail list logo
