[gentoo-user] ggi is low level library (lower then SDL)?

2005-04-06 Thread éæ å
Being dumb again. I really know nothing about graphic libraries. I noticed many packages can be compiled with "ggi" or "sdl" USE flag, and libsdl can be compiled with "ggi" USE flag, but libggi cannot be compiled with "sdl" USE flag. Then I come to guess, since SDL can use GGI for rendering, GGI

Re: [gentoo-user] ggi is low level library (lower then SDL)?

2005-04-06 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
Hi, On Wednesday 06 April 2005 10:22, éæ å wrote: > Being dumb again. I really know nothing about graphic libraries. > > I noticed many packages can be compiled with "ggi" or "sdl" USE flag, and > libsdl can be compiled with "ggi" USE flag, but libggi cannot be compiled > with "sdl" USE flag. Then

Re: [gentoo-user] ggi is low level library (lower then SDL)?

2005-04-06 Thread Aurélien Reynaud
Le mercredi 06 avril 2005 Ã 15:26 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann a Ãcrit : > ggi is a lowlevel graphics system, to replace X or svgalib. > > SDL is an abstraction for ogl/X/svgalib/directX and a lot of other stuff. Not quite. GGI is an abstraction as well. You can run ggi apps over X, framebuffer,

Re: [gentoo-user] ggi is low level library (lower then SDL)?

2005-04-06 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Wednesday 06 April 2005 16:38, AurÃlien Reynaud wrote: > Le mercredi 06 avril 2005 Ã 15:26 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann a Ãcrit : > > ggi is a lowlevel graphics system, to replace X or svgalib. > > > > SDL is an abstraction for ogl/X/svgalib/directX and a lot of other stuff. > > Not quite. > > GG