On Thursday 17 February 2005 23:09, Matthias F. Brandstetter wrote:
> > Problem with ext3.
> > Been here, done this.
> > Switch to reiserfs, problem will disappear.
> > Reiser is also more suitable for lots of small files too.
>
> Aha ok, I will check that out. Do you know why this happens -- is ex
-- quoting Mike Williams --
> On Thursday 17 February 2005 21:41, Matthias F. Brandstetter wrote:
> > Now I do not really know where to search for the problem. Is it
> > Linux's software raid5 implementation, which is buggy? Is it one or
> > more of the IDE disks? Or is this normal
On Thursday 17 February 2005 21:41, Matthias F. Brandstetter wrote:
> Now I do not really know where to search for the problem. Is it Linux's
> software raid5 implementation, which is buggy? Is it one or more of the
> IDE disks? Or is this normal for large (~400gb) ext3 partitions?
>
> Where do I g
-- quoting Bob Sanders --
> Bad drives? I don't trust drives until they've run for at least 2 wks
> after I purchase them - I've had them die in that time.
But do you think that all 3 of them are bad? Since I run a raid and do the
filesystem check over this whole array, I wonder
> I am running the backups every night, but afterwards when I unmount the
> raid array and make a fsck.ext3 over it, every time I get errors (bad
> blocks here, some inode errors there and so on). Next night I can use the
> array quite fine, but on the day after that I get some filesystem errors
Hi all,
I have a backup system with 3 brand new IDE disks (200gb each), and a linux
based software raid5 over them. I am storing data of some servers on
this /dev/md0 (ext3 on it), including thousands of little files from a
mailserver, some webs, and some data of windows based servers.
I am ru
