On Wednesday 28 Jan 2004 05:10, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 02:41:10 + Peter Ruskin
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | Despite what Ciaran said, if you try to emerge sparc-dev-sources on
> | an x86 arch you'll come up against a nasty block.
>
> Only if you have the version of p
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 23:38:42 -0700 Collins Richey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| If it's such a good idea, why is it marked ~x86?
Because it's not been heavily tested for at least 30 days yet.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
Mail:ciaranm at gentoo.org
Web: http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm
pgp0.pgp
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 05:10:21 +
Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 02:41:10 + Peter Ruskin
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | Despite what Ciaran said, if you try to emerge sparc-dev-sources on an
> | x86 arch you'll come up against a nasty block.
>
> Only if yo
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 20:39:22 -0800
Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>The instructions below give no specific info on whether to to create
> the linux link in /usr/src. Is this still required for 2.6 kernels? I
> assume so since some folks will likely use genkernel?
>
>If so, d
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 02:41:10 + Peter Ruskin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Despite what Ciaran said, if you try to emerge sparc-dev-sources on an
| x86 arch you'll come up against a nasty block.
Only if you have the version of pciutils that doesn't work properly with
2.6.x kernels :) Chances are
On Wednesday 28 Jan 2004 02:12, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 15:29, Collins Richey wrote:
>
>
> > Note that Ciaran has recommended using sparc-dev-sources-2.6.2_rc2.
> > In spite of the title, aparently it will work for x86 as well, and
> > apparently it has some additional patches t
Hi,
The instructions below give no specific info on whether to to create
the linux link in /usr/src. Is this still required for 2.6 kernels? I
assume so since some folks will likely use genkernel?
If so, does the link need a specific name?
Again, thanks in advance.
Cheers,
Mark
On Tue,
On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 15:29, Collins Richey wrote:
> Note that Ciaran has recommended using sparc-dev-sources-2.6.2_rc2.
> In spite of the title, aparently it will work for x86 as well, and
> apparently it has some additional patches that are not in
> development-sources-2.6.2_rc2.
>
Thanks
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 22:29:02 +
david stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 January 2004 8:31 pm, James Lee wrote:
> > Portage pretty much takes care of everything you need when installing
> > 2.6. You won't need the alsa-driver package anymore. Everything is
> > still configur
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 14:27:42 -0800
"Mark Knecht" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >Also, does the Alsa emerge work correctly for 2.6 kernels? I know
> > > that Alsa is now built into the kernel, so I assume that configuration
> > > is going to be slightly different, but I'm hoping that the emerg
> >Also, does the Alsa emerge work correctly for 2.6 kernels? I know
> > that Alsa is now built into the kernel, so I assume that configuration
> > is going to be slightly different, but I'm hoping that the emerge of
> > Alsa puts everything in the right place.
> >
>
> The 2.6 contains the equi
On Tuesday 27 January 2004 8:31 pm, James Lee wrote:
> Portage pretty much takes care of everything you need when installing
> 2.6. You won't need the alsa-driver package anymore. Everything is
> still configured the same way (modify /etc/modules.d/alsa, modules-
> update, rc-update add alsasound
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:06:40 -0700 Collins Richey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| Apparently, if you require a non-english keyboard, you're SOL, but
| otherwise 2.6 works great.
Naah, just use sys-kernel/sparc-dev-sources-2.6.2_rc2 (yes, it should
work fine on x86 too). Should be fixed in there...
-
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 12:22:23 -0800
Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>Can someone suggest what is likely to be the best option for a user
> who would like to try a 2.6 kernel and needs to be able to use the
> newest versions of Alsa?
Apparently, if you require a non-english keyboar
On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 12:31, James Lee wrote:
> Portage pretty much takes care of everything you need when installing
> 2.6. You won't need the alsa-driver package anymore. Everything is
> still configured the same way (modify /etc/modules.d/alsa, modules-
> update, rc-update add alsasound boot).
Does genkernel works with 2.6 kernel or not ?
James Lee wrote:
Portage pretty much takes care of everything you need when installing
2.6. You won't need the alsa-driver package anymore. Everything is
still configured the same way (modify /etc/modules.d/alsa, modules-
update, rc-update add alsas
Portage pretty much takes care of everything you need when installing
2.6. You won't need the alsa-driver package anymore. Everything is
still configured the same way (modify /etc/modules.d/alsa, modules-
update, rc-update add alsasound boot). One thing to remember is that
your modules names sho
Hi,
Can someone suggest what is likely to be the best option for a user
who would like to try a 2.6 kernel and needs to be able to use the
newest versions of Alsa?
Specifically, please provide whatever emerge instructions you can
lend as well as any specific make.conf options (or other thing
18 matches
Mail list logo
