Andrew Cowie wrote:
On Thu, 2005-24-02 at 15:31 -0800, Andy McCarty wrote:
I would like to use db-4.2.52. But this is masked...
I've been using db-4.2.52 for over 6 months now. It's stable and
reliable. The ebuilds in portage worked fine; no need to do a manual
install.
No no no, he asked for
On Thursday 24 February 2005 05:31 pm, Andy McCarty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I would like to use db-4.2.52. But this is masked and uses
db-4.1.25 instead.
How do you unmask and use it to replace db-4.1.25?
Ultimately I would like to complile subversion against db-4.2.
Has anyone done this
On Thu, 2005-24-02 at 15:31 -0800, Andy McCarty wrote:
I would like to use db-4.2.52. But this is masked...
I've been using db-4.2.52 for over 6 months now. It's stable and
reliable. The ebuilds in portage worked fine; no need to do a manual
install.
AfC
Sydney
--
Stop the insanity!
yep that is interesting when I do New pannel nothing happens
(no sub menu there as I have on other machine with 2.2)
|On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 23:49, raptor wrote:
| Everything is ok.. only that I cannot create panels !!
|
|You should be able to right click on a panel and see New Panel. Click
On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 23:49, raptor wrote:
Everything is ok.. only that I cannot create panels !!
You should be able to right click on a panel and see New Panel. Click
that to add one.
If all the panels are gone... you're not supposed to be able to do that
(minimum one panel, although you can
Petric Frank wrote:
What about only downloading diffs (if available) and applying it to the older
version. This would reduce download times on client side and load on server
side.
This already happens with some packages, like (for example), the latest
gcc-3.2.x update (amongst many others),
begin quote
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 01:11:35 +0100
Petric Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about only downloading diffs (if available) and applying it to
the older version. This would reduce download times on client side
and load on server side. Ok - there must be a method to decide when
Hello Spider,
On Thursday 27 November 2003 01:44, Spider wrote:
What about only downloading diffs (if available) and applying it to
the older version. This would reduce download times on client side
and load on server side. Ok - there must be a method to decide when
it's better to
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 10:17:27 -0500
Jay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all, I have upgraded to the latest version of apache and now I get
the following error..
Forbidden
You don't have permission to access / on this server.
After I sent off that email, I was searching through the
commonapache2.conf file trying to figure what the problem was and I found
the following
### This should be changed to whatever you set DocumentRoot to.
###
Directory /var/www/localhost/htdocs
Made the change and everything works perfectly
Hallo, I'm a new gentoo user, I like this distro, but I've a question, I
have not an adsl, so I use the cdcache option for the boot, but now I
want to upgrade few software to the newest version, how can I tell to
portage to search over internet? For example, I wanted to upgrade
evolution, I
On 09 Sep 2003 23:49:42 +0200 Pietro Leone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Hallo, I'm a new gentoo user, I like this distro, but I've a question, I
| have not an adsl, so I use the cdcache option for the boot, but now I
| want to upgrade few software to the newest version, how can I tell to
| portage
Thanks, I looked there and missed it somehow ...
BillK
On Thu, 2003-07-03 at 20:02, Stroller wrote:
On 3/7/03 12:28 pm, William Kenworthy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not so long ago someone posted the location of the upgrade from gentoo
1.2 to the current 1.4 series. Can someone repost the
That guide works good. I used it not to long ago to upgrade my 1.1a box
and it went pretty seamlesss (however updating world took days :). Don't
forget about the --resume feature of portage!
Cheers,
Mike
--
And don't tell me there isn't one bit of difference between null and
space, because
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003 14:59, Dhruba Bandopadhyay wrote:
I'm curious if there are any built in tools to make
this transition a bit easier (or a good link w/ directions). Are there
any
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/new-upgrade-to-gentoo-1.4.xml
Wow :-)
That's a whole hell of a lot easier than
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I am running an old GCC from the Gentoo 1.1a days. I keep up to dates on
packages but I never update GCC. I remember there used to be some issues
move from GCC 2.95 to 3, but perhaps now enough time has passed that this
is a simple process.
I'm curious if there are
That is exactly what I was looking for thanks!
Mike
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Dhruba Bandopadhyay wrote:
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 03:59:29 +0100
From: Dhruba Bandopadhyay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Upgrade
On Friday 07 March 2003 18:15, Yinchie wrote:
Hey,
Stupid question but what keycombination is AltGr ?
the 'Alt' on the right of the space-bar
Glück Auf
Volker
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Stupid question but what keycombination is AltGr ?
Right Alt. Xev says it has keycode 113. Don't know about US keyboards which
only have Alt (left and right.)
Works that way on US keyboards. The two alt keys have different scan
codes.
--
Thomas M. Beaudry
k8la / ys1ztm
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thursday 06 March 2003 11:12 pm, Norberto Bensa wrote:
I've upgraded to X 4.3 (from 4.2.1) and now my keyboard has changed its
layout. I use Latin American layout, most of the keys work, but @ and euro
don't.
Option XkbLayout la
If you want developers to stop changing
On Friday 07 March 2003 06:32 am, Toby Dickenson wrote:
On Thursday 06 March 2003 11:12 pm, Norberto Bensa wrote:
Option XkbLayout la
The file that defines the la keyboard layout in X is
/etc/X11/xkb/symbols/la The format is readable, so you might want to look
at what has
On Friday 07 March 2003 02:15 pm, Yinchie wrote:
Hey,
Stupid question but what keycombination is AltGr ?
Right Alt. Xev says it has keycode 113. Don't know about US keyboards which
only have Alt (left and right.)
Regards,
Norberto
pgp0.pgp
Description: signature
Timothy James Friesen wrote:
I did an emerge sync tonite, and portage wants to upgrade my gnome panel from
2.2 to 1.4. Is there any way to change this? Or is this just a problem with
the ports?
gnome-panel uses slots, so 1.x can exist happily alongside 2.x.
Emerging it should not delete 2.2 :)
23 matches
Mail list logo
