Re: [gentoo-user] dual Xeon setup

2004-02-05 Thread Imre Solti
Iwill DPL 533 mobo 2.4 and on other machine 2.8 GHz double Xeon CPUs HT enabled 1 GB memory pentium4 flag used on the 2.4 GHz machine since May. Other than OpenOffice everything else compiles and runs OK with pentium4 and gcc-3.2. I am not sure what is what somebody else refered to as things bre

Re: Re: [gentoo-user] dual Xeon setup

2004-02-02 Thread Lloyd H. Meinholz
> I know Gentoo is Linux and Linux has SMP support. As I stated, I run a dual-933 SMP > system presently. But, how in the heck do you pick up 4CPUs with HyperThreading? I > thought HT was a memory-specific technology, not CPU? And do you actually see any > significant performance gains with you

Re: [gentoo-user] dual Xeon setup

2004-02-02 Thread Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 01 February 2004 23:36, Robert G. Waycott wrote: > I know Gentoo is Linux and Linux has SMP support. As I stated, I run a > dual-933 SMP system presently. Sorry, missed that :) > But, how in the heck do you pick up 4CPUs > with HyperThre

Re: [gentoo-user] dual Xeon setup

2004-02-02 Thread Spider
begin quote On Sun, 1 Feb 2004 19:28:43 -0500 Robert G. Waycott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So, um ... why is invalid SSE2 code generated? Any ideas on when this > will be fixed? Why? Bug in gcc 3.2.x Fixed: in gcc 3.3.x But 3.3.x broke other things. //Spider -- begin .signature This i

Re: [gentoo-user] dual Xeon setup

2004-02-01 Thread Dennis Freise
On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 18:37:27 -0600 "Canek Peláez Valdés" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > # PENTIUM4 will generate invalid SSE2 instructions; use 'pentium3' instead. > > # > > > > Also, the performance gain when using pentium4 instead of pentium3 is > > minimal. > > I need to disagree. I have a To

Re: [gentoo-user] dual Xeon setup

2004-02-01 Thread Canek Peláez Valdés
On Sun, 2004-02-01 at 18:07, Dennis Freise wrote: > On Sun, 1 Feb 2004 18:36:25 -0500 > Robert G. Waycott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Okay, okay ... well, like I said ... I run a dual-933 rig right now. I've been > > doing SMP for quite some time in Gentoo. Pretty proficient with it on a P3 >

Re: Re: [gentoo-user] dual Xeon setup

2004-02-01 Thread Robert G . Waycott
So, um ... why is invalid SSE2 code generated? Any ideas on when this will be fixed? Neuros. --***-- Yep, this message is electronic. Zeroes and ones, baby. Ones and zeroes. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] dual Xeon setup

2004-02-01 Thread Dennis Freise
On Sun, 1 Feb 2004 18:36:25 -0500 Robert G. Waycott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Okay, okay ... well, like I said ... I run a dual-933 rig right now. I've been > doing SMP for quite some time in Gentoo. Pretty proficient with it on a P3 > platform. Just curious how things might be different with P

Re: Re: [gentoo-user] dual Xeon setup

2004-02-01 Thread Robert G . Waycott
> > From: Mike Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2004/02/01 Sun PM 06:15:34 EST > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] dual Xeon setup > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Sunday 01 February 2004 23:10, Robert G. Wayco

Re: [gentoo-user] dual Xeon setup

2004-02-01 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sun, 1 Feb 2004 18:10:38 -0500 "Robert G. Waycott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | Hey Gentoo Users. I am sure that there are some dual-Xeon users out | there, so I'd like your input. I am putting together a dual 2.0GHz | Xeon rig here--Foster core--with 1Gb RDRAM on an IWill DP400 | mainboard. Any

Re: [gentoo-user] dual Xeon setup

2004-02-01 Thread Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 01 February 2004 23:10, Robert G. Waycott wrote: > Hey Gentoo Users. I am sure that there are some dual-Xeon users out there, > so I'd like your input. I am putting together a dual 2.0GHz Xeon rig > here--Foster core--with 1Gb RDRAM on an IWi