Re: [gentoo-user] Re: CFLAGS "...-O3 -pipe" vs "...O2 "

maxim wexler wrote: > > Too late. Damage done. I decided to go with the > example make.conf which call the O3 level "decent". > >> -- >> gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list >> >> >> Exactly what kind of damage are you talking about? Don't you think if there was a real problem with -O3, g

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: CFLAGS "...-O3 -pipe" vs "...O2 "

Davi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Em Terça 10 Abril 2007 16:56, Jesús Guerrero escreveu: >> No, --newuse is for use flags. He need to rebuild ALL the packages. So, >> "emerge --emptytree world" would do. > > > ** Thinking: rebuild all = all packages = kde + Xorg + glibc + OOo + ... > Humm... **

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: CFLAGS "...-O3 -pipe" vs "...O2 "

On Wednesday 11 April 2007 11:39:50 Daniel Iliev wrote: > Exactly what kind of damage are you talking about? Don't you think if > there was a real problem with -O3, gentoo devs would have excluded it as > an option, especially when they have an easy to apply mechanism for > doing that (I have in mi

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: CFLAGS "...-O3 -pipe" vs "...O2 "

Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote: > On Wednesday 11 April 2007 11:39:50 Daniel Iliev wrote: > >> Exactly what kind of damage are you talking about? Don't you think if >> there was a real problem with -O3, gentoo devs would have excluded it as >> an option, especially when they have an easy to apply mech

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: CFLAGS "...-O3 -pipe" vs "...O2 "

Em Quarta 11 Abril 2007 07:56, Daniel Iliev escreveu: > Sorry, I don't get it. Perhaps it is my poor English but I couldn't > understand two things: > - Is -O3 supported by Gentoo or not? Yes. > - What's the special thing about Gentoo ebuilds that makes -O3 dangerous? Nothing. O3 isn't dangero

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: CFLAGS "...-O3 -pipe" vs "...O2 "

On Wednesday 11 April 2007 12:56:43 Daniel Iliev wrote: > Sorry, I don't get it. Perhaps it is my poor English but I couldn't > understand two things: > - Is -O3 supported by Gentoo or not? -O3 is supported by Gentoo. > - What's the special thing about Gentoo ebuilds that makes -O3 dangerous?

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: CFLAGS "...-O3 -pipe" vs "...O2 "

Hi all.. I think what -O3 is not _dangerous_ when you know how to use, a few posts ago someone mentioned not all of packages can be compiled using -O3, if I am not wrong was GCC and OpenOffice.org. The thing is: -O3 is not a _damage_ is an carefully flag to compile for some packages.. In some w

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: CFLAGS "...-O3 -pipe" vs "...O2 "

Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote: > On Wednesday 11 April 2007 12:56:43 Daniel Iliev wrote: > >> Sorry, I don't get it. Perhaps it is my poor English but I couldn't >> understand two things: >> - Is -O3 supported by Gentoo or not? >> > > -O3 is supported by Gentoo. > > >> - What's the special

[gentoo-user] mod_auth_ldap vs USE=ldap for apache2

Hi, I try to setup access to several SVN repositories. They are located on a gentoo server (will probably be moved to a solaris system though). Authentification should be done against our ActiveDirectory Windows system - i.e. the SVN users will only need windows user name and windows password.

[gentoo-user] Followup: mod_auth_ldap vs USE=ldap for apache2

Another somehwat unclear thing: In the config flag AUTH_LDAP seems to be responsible for BOTH ldap auth modules (mm_mod_auth_ldap AND mod_auth_ldap) - is there some configurable way to disentangle them? -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-user] laptop sometimes needs double keystrokes

Hello, I have a strange problem on my laptop[1] wherein I need sometimes need to enter keystrokes twice in order for them to be recognised. For example, I type 'ls' but the 's' needs to be entered twice. The problem has bee present for some time and I have noted the following: (1) I see the pro

[gentoo-user] Why is apache 2.2 hard masked?

Hi, I'm fighting with authentification problems (see my further mails about mod_auth_ldap) and maybe a new module available for apache 2.2 might solve them. BUT apache 2.2 is hard masked - why? Any experiences? - TIA - Wolfgang -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Why is apache 2.2 hard masked?

On 4/11/07, Wolfgang Liebich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm fighting with authentification problems (see my further mails about mod_auth_ldap) and maybe a new module available for apache 2.2 might solve them. BUT apache 2.2 is hard masked - why? Any experiences? $ emerge -pv ">=apache-2.2" T

Re: [gentoo-user] laptop sometimes needs double keystrokes

Roger Mason wrote: > I have a strange problem on my laptop[1] wherein I need sometimes > need to enter keystrokes twice in order for them to be > recognised. For example, I type 'ls' but the 's' needs to be > entered twice. The problem has bee present for some time and I > have noted the followin

Re: [gentoo-user] laptop sometimes needs double keystrokes

Hi Benno, Benno Schulenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Roger Mason wrote: >> I have a strange problem on my laptop[1] wherein I need sometimes >> need to enter keystrokes twice in order for them to be >> recognised. For example, I type 'ls' but the 's' needs to be >> entered twice. The probl

[gentoo-user] Fwd: problem :eht0 not getting detected

hello i have recently started with gentoo. there is a problem my eth0 is not there in ifconfig (lo is only there ) .used ispci it showed realtek. used modprobe-l |grep rtl it gives rtl8150.ko the on modprobing rtl8150 it gets loaded but on ifconfig there is no eth0 what should i do ? please he

Re: [gentoo-user] laptop sometimes needs double keystrokes

Roger Mason wrote: > >> I have a strange problem on my laptop[1] wherein I need > >> sometimes need to enter keystrokes twice in order for them to > >> be recognised. For example, I type 'ls' but the 's' needs to > >> be entered twice. Are it certain keys (like the 's') that have the problem? Ar

Re: [gentoo-user] laptop sometimes needs double keystrokes

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Benno Schulenberg wrote: > Are it certain keys (like the 's') that have the problem? Are it [...] > single-user maintenaince mode? Does it happen when running from > a liveCD? I'd add: Does it happen on memtest86 or another OS or gnu/li

[gentoo-user] floppy flops: mtools vs file managers

Ordinarily, I use Mtools to manage diskettes (floppies): it's very fast & efficient to copy & delete files from the CLI. I've long had Krusader installed & have recently tested Thunar & Dolphin & find that while they claim to handle diskettes, it's not reliable: sometimes they do copy or delete fi

Re: [gentoo-user] floppy flops: mtools vs file managers

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Philip Webb wrote: > Ordinarily, I use Mtools to manage diskettes (floppies): > it's very fast & efficient to copy & delete files from the CLI. I presume you use only FAT12 formatted floppies (i.e. no ext2), as that is the only format mtools supports (last I looked

Re: [gentoo-user] Fwd: problem :eht0 not getting detected

Well specifically what kind of realtek ethernet card is it. A quick count in my kernel config showed 3 different drivers for realtek. You might want to try modprobing the other ones and see if that brings it up. On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 11:34:28AM -0700, agam gupta wrote: > hello > > i have re

Re: [gentoo-user] Fwd: problem :eht0 not getting detected

what about ifconfig -a? I sometimes run into a problem where udev remaps the ethernet device. On 4/11/07, Richard Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Well specifically what kind of realtek ethernet card is it. A quick count in my kernel config showed 3 different drivers for realtek. You might want

Re: [gentoo-user] floppy flops: mtools vs file managers

On Wednesday 11 April 2007 20:56, Philip Webb wrote: > Ordinarily, I use Mtools to manage diskettes (floppies): > it's very fast & efficient to copy & delete files from the CLI. > > I've long had Krusader installed & have recently tested Thunar & Dolphin > & find that while they claim to handle dis

Re: [gentoo-user] Fwd: problem :eht0 not getting detected

On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 14:26:51 -0700 "Joshua Doll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 4/11/07, Richard Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Well specifically what kind of realtek ethernet card is it. A > > quick count in my kernel config showed 3 different drivers for > > realtek. You might want t

Re: [gentoo-user] X locks up

On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 09:11:15PM +0200, Benno Schulenberg wrote: > Michael George wrote: > > What happens is that sometimes (amazingly frequently) when I have > > open office running on my right screen and I click "File", the > > displays will freeze. The system is still running, because I can >

Re: [gentoo-user] X locks up

So far, I haven't checked the output of Xorg.0.log. Next time it locks up, I'll check that and file a bug with freedesktop with all my details. The two bugs you cite may be similar, but since I still get the lockup with 1.4.6.1, it's not quite the same. -- -M There are 10 kinds of people in thi

[gentoo-user] 2.6.19-r5 kernel disaster

Hi group, After running make menuconfig 4x on a PIII, re-emerging --emptytree world and either booting to a highly unstable system or a maintenance login I feel it's time to call on the authorities. Don't even have gpm so I can't scroll the choice bits of the boot messages. It all starts to fall

Re: [gentoo-user] 2.6.19-r5 kernel disaster

Check that you have CONFIG_UNIX=y in your .config. The udev daemon (udevd) listens on a unix domain socket. When udevd doesn't run your hda3 device is not created in /dev which explains the later messages. I'm not sure why udevstart would crash your system though. Do you get a kernel oops or does

Re: [gentoo-user] Why is apache 2.2 hard masked?

Vladimir Rusinov schrieb: On 4/11/07, *Wolfgang Liebich* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: I'm fighting with authentification problems (see my further mails about mod_auth_ldap) and maybe a new module available for apache 2.2 might solve them. BUT apache