On Saturday 15 March 2008, Gustavo Campos wrote:
> And about Marvin, I'm proud to say that I'm the 42 shirt of my
> university soccer team, kinda nerdy for a computer science student
> huh?
You got the #42 shirt??? Wow. You're a real frood.
--
Alan McKinnon
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
--
On Saturday 15 March 2008, Chris Brennan wrote:
> Welcome to the Fold! Us nerds should get together and put up the
> end-all Guide discussions ... should be pretty awesome :D
>
> Hot, Cold, Wet ... it's all the same .. But taking a bath just to
> make a meaningless and preportedly major decision, n
On Friday 14 March 2008, Johan Blåbäck wrote:
> I know nothing about this (udev), so any outside input to this
> discussion would be good.
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/kernel/hotplug/udev-FAQ
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Udev
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/udev-guide.xml
--
Regards,
Mi
Hi guys,
It's kinda late by my erratic bodyclock, so I'm assuming I'm doing
something stupid. Can anyone slap me with a kipper, please?
(Or should I be using the fuse NTFS driver?)
Stroller.
$ ls -ld /mnt/foo/
drwxrwx--- 2 root users 48 Aug 1 2007 /mnt/foo/
$ sudo mount -v /dev/sda2 /mn
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 09:33:09 +, Stroller wrote:
> It's kinda late by my erratic bodyclock, so I'm assuming I'm doing
> something stupid. Can anyone slap me with a kipper, please?
Don't try to write with the in-kernel NTFS driver.
> (Or should I be using the fuse NTFS driver?)
Yes, most d
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 09:14:28 +0800, Cocoy Dayao wrote:
> i apologize if you get this twice now. i got an error message from the
> list saying this message was undelivered by pigeon.gentoo.org, so i am
> resending.
I got the same bounce message from the post to which you replied :(
--
Neil
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 23:50:16 -0300, Gustavo Campos wrote:
> And for instance, I would apprecciate if you guys made some globalized
> jokes,
The entire Galaxy isn't global enough for you?
--
Neil Bothwick
Micro-: (prefix) anything both very small and very expensive.
signature.asc
Description
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 00:26:10 +0100, Daniel Mendler wrote:
> I have the doc use flag activated globally.
Are you aware that this is only needed if you ant extra documentation,
usually for developers. Even if you do want such information, it is
unlikely you need it globally. Man pages et al are ins
On 15 Mar 2008, at 09:48, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 09:33:09 +, Stroller wrote:
It's kinda late by my erratic bodyclock, so I'm assuming I'm doing
something stupid. Can anyone slap me with a kipper, please?
Don't try to write with the in-kernel NTFS driver.
(Or should
As far as I know, Thunderbird doesn't support external filters (imho a
very big disadvantage). You could get around it by using a local mail
server. If you find another way, let me know. I'm interested in this as
well.
On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 09:47 +0100, cypherstrong wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Do you know
On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 09:56 +0100, b.n. wrote:
> Alan McKinnon ha scritto:
> > On Thursday 13 March 2008, b.n. wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> After a hard freeze on the Gentoo partition of my Macbook Pro laptop,
> >> I rebooted, and I found this dreaded message:
> >>
> >> /dev/sda4: UNEXPECTED INCONSIS
On Sat, 2008-03-15 at 11:11 +0100, Florian Philipp wrote:
> As far as I know, Thunderbird doesn't support external filters (imho a
> very big disadvantage). You could get around it by using a local mail
> server. If you find another way, let me know. I'm interested in this as
> well.
>
> On Thu
On Sat, 2008-03-15 at 09:48 +, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 09:33:09 +, Stroller wrote:
>
> > It's kinda late by my erratic bodyclock, so I'm assuming I'm doing
> > something stupid. Can anyone slap me with a kipper, please?
>
> Don't try to write with the in-kernel NTFS
do you know a bogofilter proxy that could score on the fly a pop3
server? perhaps in perl that coumd be easy to make. I will try soonly.
On 3/15/08, Florian Philipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As far as I know, Thunderbird doesn't support external filters (imho a
> very big disadvantage). You co
On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 18:27 +, James wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a firewall that is built pretty minimally on a P3 and
> and old 4 gig ide disk:
>
> /dev/hda3 2068348 1668104400244 81% /
> /dev/hda1 100728 40452 60276 41% /boot
>
> I have a 4 gig Cf
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 11:40:11 +0100, Florian Philipp wrote:
> By the way: Which one is better (or are they the same?): ntfs-3g or
> ntfsprogs with USE="fuse"?
ntfs3g is the driver, ntfsprogs contains the mkfs, resize, fsck etc.
programs, the fuse USE flag enables support for fuse filesystems.
In
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
ntfs-3g is better then the kernel ntfs drivers
Stroller wrote:
| Hi guys,
|
| It's kinda late by my erratic bodyclock, so I'm assuming I'm doing
| something stupid. Can anyone slap me with a kipper, please?
|
| (Or should I be using the fuse NTFS dr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
How come I don't see my own posts to this list?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFH28bX8hUIAnGfls4RAvPaAJ9iVi3RdAD798CYdMQJC0AsGuNjIQCgiRD/
/WHaJPY2Uj
Chris Brennan wrote:
How come I don't see my own posts to this list?
We got this one. I saw one other one too.
Dale
:-) :-)
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dale wrote:
| Chris Brennan wrote:
|> How come I don't see my own posts to this list?
|
| We got this one. I saw one other one too.
| Dale
|
| :-) :-)
Ya but you didn't answer my question :D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GN
Chris Brennan wrote:
Dale wrote:
| Chris Brennan wrote:
|> How come I don't see my own posts to this list?
|
| We got this one. I saw one other one too.
| Dale
|
| :-) :-)
Ya but you didn't answer my question :D
Sometimes the mail server filters them out. I read that ?gmail? and a
few ot
Chris Brennan wrote:
> How come I don't see my own posts to this list?
You seem to be using google for mx... ;-)
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On 16/03/2008, Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sometimes the mail server filters them out. I read that ?gmail? and a
> few others do that. Not sure why or how to over come it tho. Somewhat
> common from my reading.
I concur with that... gmail seems to filter out duplicates from all my
mail
On Saturday 15 March 2008, Chris Brennan wrote:
> Dale wrote:
> | Chris Brennan wrote:
> |> How come I don't see my own posts to this list?
> |
> | We got this one. I saw one other one too.
> | Dale
> |
> | :-) :-)
>
> Ya but you didn't answer my question :D
The list software doesn't send a copy
Well, I must admit I'm not really in the position to negate that one.
Not a so travelled man, you know?
The truth is that it take me some time to notice you guys were talking
about our bible-like-one-that-works-e-book, I'm used to read English,
but mostly that one in the tech books.
But never fea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Norberto Bensa wrote:
| Chris Brennan wrote:
|> How come I don't see my own posts to this list?
|
| You seem to be using google for mx... ;-)
|
|
|
Indeed I am, appeears to be the only reliable free mail service I have
access to at the moment
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alan McKinnon wrote:
| On Saturday 15 March 2008, Chris Brennan wrote:
|> Dale wrote:
|> | Chris Brennan wrote:
|> |> How come I don't see my own posts to this list?
|> |
|> | We got this one. I saw one other one too.
|> | Dale
|> |
|> | :-) :-)
|
I believe that is true.
In gmail we usually see our own posts because it composes the
conversations not only with the received messages, but also with the
sent ones (in the sent messages label)
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 10:35 AM, Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 15 March 2008,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
well we could all just give up and communicate in binary You can
read and right binary can't you?
Gustavo Campos wrote:
| Well, I must admit I'm not really in the position to negate that one.
| Not a so travelled man, you know?
|
| The truth is
Of course I can, but first we must state:
little or big endian?
compliment by two?
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 10:46 AM, Chris Brennan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> well we could all just give up and communicate in binary You can
> read and r
* Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A long time ago I read a HUGE thread on b.g.o. about this, the eventual
> conclusion is that after installation of a lib, a user might well want
> to link those libs statically and if they are not there, portage will
> barf big time and has no way to
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 08:53:43 -0400
Chris Brennan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> How come I don't see my own posts to this list?
>
/* offtopic
Please, don't hijack threads. It is irritating for people using
thread-aware e-mail clients. Even more it is offending to the original
poster, because t
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 15:35:32 +0200
Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 15 March 2008, Chris Brennan wrote:
> > Dale wrote:
> > | Chris Brennan wrote:
> > |> How come I don't see my own posts to this list?
> > |
> > | We got this one. I saw one other one too.
> > | Dale
> > |
>
On Saturday 15 March 2008, Gustavo Campos wrote:
> Of course I can, but first we must state:
>
> little or big endian?
> compliment by two?
Pah! These cocky youngsters, all full of bright ideas about using fancy
new-fangled stuff. What is this endian nonsense of which you speak? And
this twos c
On Saturday 15 March 2008, Daniel Iliev wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 15:35:32 +0200
>
> Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Saturday 15 March 2008, Chris Brennan wrote:
> > > Dale wrote:
> > > | Chris Brennan wrote:
> > > |> How come I don't see my own posts to this list?
> > > |
> > >
On Saturday 15 March 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > > The list software doesn't send a copy of a mail back to the same
> > > address as what sent it. This is pretty usual behaviour for any
> > > list run by a non-idiot (like this one)
> >
> > Is that so? Then will you, please, explain how do peopl
On Sat, 2008-03-15 at 16:31 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Saturday 15 March 2008, Daniel Iliev wrote:
> > On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 15:35:32 +0200
> >
> > Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Saturday 15 March 2008, Chris Brennan wrote:
> > > > Dale wrote:
> > > > | Chris Brennan wrote:
On 15/03/2008, Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The list software doesn't send a copy of a mail back to the same address
> as what sent it.
That's unfortunate as it screws up GMail's conversation feature - also
the list email serves as confirmation that your message has got
through.
C
On Saturday 15 March 2008, Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
> On Saturday 15 March 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > > > The list software doesn't send a copy of a mail back to the
> > > > same address as what sent it. This is pretty usual behaviour
> > > > for any list run by a non-idiot (like this one)
> > >
>
On Saturday 15 March 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> OK, lets go back to step 1, and try to think it through this time.
>
> - a user sends a mail from account X to list Y
> - same user is also subscribed to list Y from account X
> - if list Y sends a copy of the mail to the user at account X, then
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alan McKinnon wrote:
| On Saturday 15 March 2008, Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
|> On Saturday 15 March 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
| The list software doesn't send a copy of a mail back to the
| same address as what sent it. This is pretty usual beha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yes well, I am using thunderbird and my mail is stored on a remote
server on my lan, so I can check my mail from any machine in my house.
So yes, I am using Google Apps to host my e-mail, it's convenient for me
and meets me needs and requirements. But
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:31:53 +0200
Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 15 March 2008, Daniel Iliev wrote:
> > On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 15:35:32 +0200
> >
> > Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Saturday 15 March 2008, Chris Brennan wrote:
> > > > Dale wrote:
> > > > | C
On Saturday 15 March 2008, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> * Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > A long time ago I read a HUGE thread on b.g.o. about this, the
> > eventual conclusion is that after installation of a lib, a user
> > might well want to link those libs statically and if they are not
Alan McKinnon schrieb:
> The list software doesn't send a copy of a mail back to the same address
> as what sent it.
Of course it does.
That you don't see it doesn't mean the list server doesn't send it.
> This is pretty usual behaviour for any list run by a
> non-idiot (like this one)
No it
BCD is good, but time goes on, we must improve, we must evolve.
We thrived, we evolved, not the time has come for us to step back
again, into the light.
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 11:30 AM, Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 15 March 2008, Gustavo Campos wrote:
> > Of course I c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
| Hmmm. There are many thousand ebuilds in the tree. Many more in 3rd
| party overlays. Your idea fixes 1 problem in 1 ebuild.
Just for the sake of amusment and to give a sense of perspective. By my
count (ls -lshaR /usr/portage | grep ebuild | wc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gustavo Campos wrote:
| BCD is good, but time goes on, we must improve, we must evolve.
|
| We thrived, we evolved, not the time has come for us to step back
| again, into the light.
Every generation has a mythology. Every millennium has a doomsda
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Friday 14 March 2008, Chuck Robey wrote:
>> Vladimir Rusinov wrote:
>
>>> Just add opengl to your use flags and `emerge -v1 =x11-libs/qt-3*`
>>> Then, you'll probably need `emerge --update --deep --newuse
>>> kde-meta` (or em
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:58:55 -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
>
>> * The die message:
>> * Please reemerge =x11-libs/qt-3* with USE="opengl".
>>
>> asks me to rebuild something that doesn't exist.
>
> It does exist, the wildcard
On Saturday 15 March 2008, Chris Brennan wrote:
> | Hmmm. There are many thousand ebuilds in the tree. Many more in 3rd
> | party overlays. Your idea fixes 1 problem in 1 ebuild.
>
> Just for the sake of amusment and to give a sense of perspective. By
> my count (ls -lshaR /usr/portage | grep ebui
I know it's good for all of us to know that we are tealking to
actually someone real, but I never got too much into PGP because of
that damned clutter messages it generates.
Anyone knows if gmail (and the other clients) can "mask" the PGP
singnatures from mail? For me at least it's pretty much eno
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I dunno if gmail can ... but I am sure thunderbird has some ext. that
might be able to help. For me, I don't see it, GNUpg just tells TB that
the message has been signed and that I can retrieve the pubkey if I wish to.
Gustavo Campos wrote:
| I know
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:58:55 -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
>
>> * The die message:
>> * Please reemerge =x11-libs/qt-3* with USE="opengl".
>>
>> asks me to rebuild something that doesn't exist.
>
> It does exist, the wildcard
Well, ther must be some Firefox extension too, probably - gone searching.
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Chris Brennan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I dunno if gmail can ... but I am sure thunderbird has some ext. that
> might be able to help
why dont use the pgp mime mode? a join file with the signature message
dont disturb people without pgp mail client
On 3/15/08, Gustavo Campos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, ther must be some Firefox extension too, probably - gone searching.
>
> On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Chris Brennan <[
Compatibility trouble?
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Strong Cypher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> why dont use the pgp mime mode? a join file with the signature message
> dont disturb people without pgp mail client
>
>
>
> On 3/15/08, Gustavo Campos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well, ther mu
On Samstag, 15. März 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Saturday 15 March 2008, Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
> > On Saturday 15 March 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > > > > The list software doesn't send a copy of a mail back to the
> > > > > same address as what sent it. This is pretty usual behaviour
> > > >
On Samstag, 15. März 2008, Alan Milnes wrote:
> On 15/03/2008, Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The list software doesn't send a copy of a mail back to the same address
> > as what sent it.
>
> That's unfortunate as it screws up GMail's conversation feature - also
> the list email serv
On Samstag, 15. März 2008, Chris Brennan wrote:
> Norberto Bensa wrote:
> | Chris Brennan wrote:
> |> How come I don't see my own posts to this list?
> |
> | You seem to be using google for mx... ;-)
>
> Indeed I am, appeears to be the only reliable free mail service I have
> access to at the momen
I think it's funny that Enigmail isn't happy with any of the messages in
this thread. Mostly "Error - No valid armored OpenPGP data block found",
one "can't find the key to import".
--
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Life is pure irony
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Matt Nordhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think it's funny that Enigmail isn't happy with any of the messages in
> this thread. Mostly "Error - No valid armored OpenPGP data block found",
> one "can't find the key to import".
> --
> --
>
>
On Saturday 15 March 2008 17:19, Gustavo Campos wrote:
> Well, ther must be some Firefox extension too, probably - gone searching.
>
> On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Chris Brennan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > I dunno if gmail can ... b
Rick van Hattem wrote:
> @Matt Nordhoff, how about my version? My key is available via a number of key
> servers.
Yay, you're good. Automatically found your key.
--
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Samstag, 15. März 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
OK, lets go back to step 1, and try to think it through this time.
- a user sends a mail from account X to list Y
- same user is also subscribed to list Y from account X
- if list Y sends a copy of the mail to the us
Chuck Robey wrote:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:58:55 -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
>> * The die message:
>> * Please reemerge =x11-libs/qt-3* with USE="opengl".
>>
>> asks me to rebuild something that doesn't exist.
> It does exist, the wildcard tells portage to install the la
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dale wrote:
> Chuck Robey wrote:
>> Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> > On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:58:55 -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
>>
>> >> * The die message:
>> >> * Please reemerge =x11-libs/qt-3* with USE="opengl".
>> >>
>> >> asks me to rebuild something th
Chuck Robey wrote:
It's certainly an aid, at least the bottom part (like i'd said, I;d foound
several different Gentoo docs giving me descriptions of what slots are, so
I knew that, just that there seem to be no docs anywhere I can locate IN
Gentoo that tell you HOW to use slots. So, now I know
On 15 Mar 2008, at 13:35, Alan McKinnon wrote:
...
The list software doesn't send a copy of a mail back to the same
address
as what sent it.
It does here.
This is pretty usual behaviour for any list run by a
non-idiot (like this one)
Usually it's a user-configurable option, obviously wi
On 15 Mar 2008, at 13:27, Norberto Bensa wrote:
Chris Brennan wrote:
How come I don't see my own posts to this list?
You seem to be using google for mx... ;-)
And to expand on that, this is an FAQ for Gmail users.
http://tinyurl.com/32h53h
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.user/
I've got an old PII Intergraph TD-225 PC that I'm trying to install Gentoo
onto. Bios is AMIBIOS. The system supports dual CPU but only has one.
It currently has WinXP running on it fine. But every Linux install/boot CD
I've run (Gentoo, CentOS, Knoppix, etc.) hangs while booting (2.4 and 2.6
On Saturday 15 March 2008, Chuck Robey wrote:
> It's certainly an aid, at least the bottom part (like i'd said, I;d
> foound several different Gentoo docs giving me descriptions of what
> slots are, so I knew that, just that there seem to be no docs
> anywhere I can locate IN Gentoo that tell you
Florian Philipp pisze:
On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 18:27 +, James wrote:
Hello,
I have a firewall that is built pretty minimally on a P3 and
and old 4 gig ide disk:
/dev/hda3 2068348 1668104400244 81% /
/dev/hda1 100728 40452 60276 41% /boot
I have
Andrew MacKenzie wrote:
I've got an old PII Intergraph TD-225 PC that I'm trying to install Gentoo
onto. Bios is AMIBIOS. The system supports dual CPU but only has one.
It currently has WinXP running on it fine. But every Linux install/boot CD
I've run (Gentoo, CentOS, Knoppix, etc.) hangs wh
Dan Farrell spore.ath.cx> writes:
> > I have a 4 gig Cf card (sandisk) and a ide-cf card that should
> > make the CF card look like an ide hard drive.
> > http://gentoo-wiki.com/Mounting_a_block_device_with_JFFS2
> > But it seems vague(outdated) and missing many steps. Or
> > am I confused? I'
dexters84 gmail.com> writes:
I did this sort of system a while ago. I've used 1GB card with gentoo
and cf-ide adapter. There are some tricky parts that nobody mentions.
One of them is that I wasn't able to boot from my 1GB "hard drive" when
it was connected via 80 pin ide cable, I've dig u
Hi,
News:
Now the small version also available for download ~60MB
Stage3 and portage snapshot also available for download.
Cheers,
István
2008. 03. 14, péntek keltezéssel 15.32-kor Pongracz Istvan ezt írta:
> Hi,
>
> Here is the new livecd (~230MB):
> http://www.osbusiness.hu/?lang=en&page_name
Don't you think the error message should have been more specific about
which library causes the conflict? Is it hugin error message?
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Thursday 13 March 2008, David Harel wrote:
Hi,
I emerged hugin-0.6.1-r2 (latest stable) with everything it depends
on and when I run
On Sat, 2008-03-15 at 15:21 -0400, Andrew MacKenzie wrote:
> I've got an old PII Intergraph TD-225 PC that I'm trying to install Gentoo
> onto. Bios is AMIBIOS. The system supports dual CPU but only has one.
>
> It currently has WinXP running on it fine. But every Linux install/boot CD
> I've
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 12:13:05 -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
> I haven't been able to find any syntax to actually use slots,
In general, you don't. Slots are mainly used for libraries and similar
programs that are used by other programs. One program needs libfoo
1.x,another needs libfoo 2.x. Slots enab
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:31:53 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > Is that so? Then will you, please, explain how do people get their
> > original messages back?
>
> There's a copy already in their outbox? And a sane mailer (like say
> kmail) will have put the sent copy there already.
The original
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 12:13:05 -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
>
>> I haven't been able to find any syntax to actually use slots,
>
> In general, you don't. Slots are mainly used for libraries and similar
> programs that are used by ot
On 15 Mar 2008, at 20:08, James wrote:
You shouldn't need to do anything special - just copy all files over
exactly, and then set up GRUB on the CF card.
Well, I've heard otherwise. Use jffs2 or the CF card will wear out
prematurely...
I've "heard" lots about using flashdrives for filesy
On 15 Mar 2008, at 20:17, James wrote:
dexters84 gmail.com> writes:
Other things you have to remeber concern file system usage, you
musn't
create swap partition, disable local syslog, log rotation, turn
everything except desired daemons etc.
Where did you get the idea not to use sw
Stroller pisze:
On 15 Mar 2008, at 20:17, James wrote:
dexters84 gmail.com> writes:
Other things you have to remeber concern file system usage, you
musn't
create swap partition, disable local syslog, log rotation, turn
everything except desired daemons etc.
Where did you get the id
Are their some simple steps to get tightvnc to work and allow me to
connect to windowsxp box on home lan?
It's pretty impossible to tell what is supposed to be done from the
man pages.
Is running tightvnc from linux to a windows box likely to require
endless jerking around and diddling with sett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Are their some simple steps to get tightvnc to work and allow me to
> connect to windowsxp box on home lan?
>
> It's pretty impossible to tell what is supposed to be done from the
> man pages.
>
> Is running tightvnc from linux to a windows box likely to require
> endl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hmm odd ... everyone that has a key I've gotten automaticly
Matt Nordhoff wrote:
| I think it's funny that Enigmail isn't happy with any of the messages in
| this thread. Mostly "Error - No valid armored OpenPGP data block found",
| one "can't f
+++ Florian Philipp [gentoo-user] [Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 10:00:20PM +0100]:
> On Sat, 2008-03-15 at 15:21 -0400, Andrew MacKenzie wrote:
> > Then it just hangs. CD can pop out and everything. Can anyone give me any
> > idea what's going wrong?
> Typically, adding the boot parameter noapic (not noa
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 17:25:28 +
Matt Nordhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think it's funny that Enigmail isn't happy with any of the messages
> in this thread. Mostly "Error - No valid armored OpenPGP data block
> found", one "can't find the key to import".
Claws isn't happy with any of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck Robey wrote:
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 12:13:05 -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
>
>>> I haven't been able to find any syntax to actually use slots,
>> In general, you don't. Slots are mainly used for libraries and similar
>> progra
Chris Brennan wrote:
> hmm odd ... everyone that has a key I've gotten automaticly
Yeah, yours is the only one I'm having trouble with. :-P
Can't find it on any of the key servers I've tried.
(Note: I"m kind of a PGP newbie. I didn't look very hard.)
--
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matt Nordhoff wrote:
| Chris Brennan wrote:
|> hmm odd ... everyone that has a key I've gotten automaticly
|
| Yeah, yours is the only one I'm having trouble with. :-P
|
| Can't find it on any of the key servers I've tried.
|
| (Note: I"m kind
Chris Brennan wrote:
> Matt Nordhoff wrote:
> | Yeah, yours is the only one I'm having trouble with. :-P
> |
> | Can't find it on any of the key servers I've tried.
> |
> | (Note: I"m kind of a PGP newbie. I didn't look very hard.)
>
>
> mmm then I will regenerate my key and resubmit it later ton
94 matches
Mail list logo