On Thursday 18 September 2008 01:20:28 Iain Buchanan wrote:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On Wednesday 17 September 2008 22:32:21 Espen Hustad wrote:
> >> On Wednesday 17 September 2008 22:03:52 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> I have a Dell XPS M1530 with an Intel IWL3945 wireless card.
Am Mittwoch 17 September 2008 23:51:57 schrieb ext Aaron Clark:
> My guess is you will want to try
> Coda out based on its wikipedia entry.
Coda is AFAIK still not production ready, so better check if OpenAFS is for
you. It's also well supported on Gentoo.
HTH...
Dirk
--
Dirk Heinrich
Quoting Marc Joliet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
except for the fact that VirtualBox seems to not run the script, even
with the full path. I can run the script manually, creating vbox1 and
then start the VM and everything works, but with:
Attached to:vbox1
That's your problem. You should
Thanks to all !!! It works :-)
Pat
Vaeth ha scritto:
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008, Stroller wrote:
The risk is that you want to install X that depends upon Y.
The ebuild for X states that version >1.2.3 of Y must be used because
there's a bug in 1.2.2.
The new version of Y fails to compile, so when X is compiled it only
has the old vers
sean wrote:
Iain Buchanan wrote:
sean wrote:
sounds like you need to run revdep-rebuild
Gentoo is kind-of different to other distros, so unless the
references you found were all about gentoo, they're probably leading
you up the wrong path.
I think you've upgraded qt, hence whatever prog
Iain Buchanan wrote:
sean wrote:
sounds like you need to run revdep-rebuild
Gentoo is kind-of different to other distros, so unless the references
you found were all about gentoo, they're probably leading you up the
wrong path.
I think you've upgraded qt, hence whatever program you're tr
Am Wed, 17 Sep 2008 20:22:54 -0300
schrieb Norberto Bensa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Quoting Marc Joliet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Right now I got it working without using a bridge. I can ping my
> > Windows XP VM and it can ping everything else on my side, however,
> > nmap won't work. I wonder why
sean wrote:
I am receiving the below error when trying to load a specific program.
what program?
"error while loading shared libraries: libqt-mt.so.3: cannot open shared
object file: No such file or directory"
sounds like you need to run revdep-rebuild
I can find references to this proble
Quoting pat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
Or my be another question :-) I need to run more then one guest OS, so
I expect I need to create next bridge, but how?
No no.. You're confusing bridges and interfaces. You make ONE bridge
and add interfaces to it. Search my email with s
sean wrote:
I am receiving the below error when trying to load a specific program.
"error while loading shared libraries: libqt-mt.so.3: cannot open
shared object file: No such file or directory"
I can find references to this problem all over the internet, but not a
cure. This should give yo
James wrote:
All,
I upgrade gentoo-sources to 2.6.26 a few days ago and just noticed
that vmware-server doesn't play nice with the new kernel.
I've seen bug ID 227303, but haven't been successful in patching
vmware-server as some of the comments in the bug indicate.
Anyone been able to get vmw
I am receiving the below error when trying to load a specific program.
"error while loading shared libraries: libqt-mt.so.3: cannot open shared
object file: No such file or directory"
I can find references to this problem all over the internet, but not a
cure. This should give you system info
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 17:55:20 -0400, James wrote:
I upgrade gentoo-sources to 2.6.26 a few days ago and just noticed
that vmware-server doesn't play nice with the new kernel.
Neither does the vmware-workstation from pportage, but there's a later
version available from VMwa
Quoting Marc Joliet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Right now I got it working without using a bridge. I can ping my
Windows XP VM and it can ping everything else on my side, however,
nmap won't work. I wonder why? Does the Windows firewall block it off?
nmap runs on the guest?
After all this, create
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Wednesday 17 September 2008 22:32:21 Espen Hustad wrote:
On Wednesday 17 September 2008 22:03:52 Alan McKinnon wrote:
Hi all,
I have a Dell XPS M1530 with an Intel IWL3945 wireless card. On
power-up/reboot it sometimes works, sometimes doesn't. I can find no
pattern at
It's very possible it's just a bug with alsamixergui...I may file a
Gentoo bug so that it can be pushed upstream.
-j
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 7:11 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 18 September 2008, James wrote:
>> Misery loves company, they say. ;)
>
> the funny t
On Thursday 18 September 2008, James wrote:
> Misery loves company, they say. ;)
the funny thing: every mixer I try works. Except alsamixergui.
Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 14:25, pat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to setup virtualbox networking. I went through the tutorial at
gentoo wiki, but I have troubles ... obvious :-(
In the howto there's called /sbin/ip, but I have no idea in which package
this p
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 18:49:28 -0400, James wrote:
> From what I've read the latest version of vmware-server (2.0, which is
> in beta and not yet in portage) is buggy enough to be unstable.
>
> ...or were you talking about VMware workstation?
I was referring to workstation, but there may be an upd
>From what I've read the latest version of vmware-server (2.0, which is
in beta and not yet in portage) is buggy enough to be unstable.
...or were you talking about VMware workstation?
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 17:55:20 -0400,
Am Tue, 16 Sep 2008 20:49:18 -0300
schrieb Norberto Bensa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Quoting Marc Joliet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >> What I need is the bidirectional communication between host and
> >> guest.
> >
> > Sorry, but I can't help you there, though I'm going to sit down and
> > set that up
Misery loves company, they say. ;)
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 6:36 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 September 2008, James wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> I have a weird one here. I have been using alsamixergui for quite some
>> time without problems on kernel 2.6.24. The oth
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 17:55:20 -0400, James wrote:
> I upgrade gentoo-sources to 2.6.26 a few days ago and just noticed
> that vmware-server doesn't play nice with the new kernel.
Neither does the vmware-workstation from pportage, but there's a later
version available from VMware, and that works wi
On Wednesday 17 September 2008, James wrote:
> All,
>
> I have a weird one here. I have been using alsamixergui for quite some
> time without problems on kernel 2.6.24. The other day I upgraded to
> 2.6.26 and now every time I try to modify the volume level(s) on
> alsamixergui for any one of the d
All,
I have a weird one here. I have been using alsamixergui for quite some
time without problems on kernel 2.6.24. The other day I upgraded to
2.6.26 and now every time I try to modify the volume level(s) on
alsamixergui for any one of the devices, the mixer just completely
hangs. The only way to
All,
I upgrade gentoo-sources to 2.6.26 a few days ago and just noticed
that vmware-server doesn't play nice with the new kernel.
I've seen bug ID 227303, but haven't been successful in patching
vmware-server as some of the comments in the bug indicate.
Anyone been able to get vmware-server to w
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello. I am trying to find out what's the best network file system (in
general, like afs, coda, nfs, cifs) fits. We have our two offices
connected to each other through a connection average at 15 to 20 KB/s
with ping-delay less than 100ms and sharing files on the server
On Wednesday 17 September 2008 22:23:24 Kent Fredric wrote:
> So much easier through poo-tinted glasses.
At least you admit your bias.
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 7:35 AM, David Leverton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> 2008/9/17 Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > This is after many requests from others for you to calm down on the list
>
> *mumble mumble mumble*
>
> > two private mails from myself asking the same, both of which you ha
On Wednesday 17 September 2008 22:32:21 Espen Hustad wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 September 2008 22:03:52 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have a Dell XPS M1530 with an Intel IWL3945 wireless card. On
> > power-up/reboot it sometimes works, sometimes doesn't. I can find no
> > pattern at all,
On Wednesday 17 September 2008 02:07:49 Hal Martin wrote:
> Marc Joliet wrote:
> > Am Tue, 16 Sep 2008 23:25:02 +0200
> >
> > schrieb pat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> Hello,
[.]
>
> I currently have all my virtual machines configured to use the
> PCnet-FAST III (Am79C973) virtual network adapter.
On Wednesday 17 September 2008 22:03:52 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a Dell XPS M1530 with an Intel IWL3945 wireless card. On
> power-up/reboot it sometimes works, sometimes doesn't. I can find no
> pattern at all, success does not depend on the machine being hot/cold
> rebooted, power
Hi all,
I have a Dell XPS M1530 with an Intel IWL3945 wireless card. On
power-up/reboot it sometimes works, sometimes doesn't. I can find no pattern
at all, success does not depend on the machine being hot/cold rebooted,
powered up from shutdown, hibernate, suspend or any other usual thing. I
Em Wednesday 17 September 2008, David Leverton escreveu:
> 2008/9/17 Zhang Le <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Actually I still don't think --resume --skipfirst can do big harm to my
> > system. After all, my system have been running well for several years.
>
> If you get so many build failures that you fe
2008/9/17 Zhang Le <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Actually I still don't think --resume --skipfirst can do big harm to my
> system.
> After all, my system have been running well for several years.
If you get so many build failures that you feel the need to
systematically ignore them, then your system is
2008/9/17 Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This is after many requests from others for you to calm down on the list
What exactly am I doing that isn't "calm"?
> two private mails from myself asking the same, both of which you have not
> answered.
I only received one, that didn't contain any
On Wednesday 17 September 2008, kashani wrote:
> Vaeth wrote:
> >> Could you please use a mail client which insert correctly the fields
> >> "In-Reply-To" ans "Reference" ?
> >
> > Thanks for the hint, I was not aware of this. But unfortunately, it
> > appears that it is not just a question of the
On 15:39 Wed 17 Sep , Stroller wrote:
> To be completely fair, if you deal with other peoples' problems on IRC on a
> regular basis then you will know the number of idiots to be quite
> staggering. There is an unending supply of them - if only we could fuel
> automobiles with idiocy! - and a
And BTW, the command I mentioned in that unpleasant IRC conversation is still
here:
http://www.gentoo.org/news/en/gwn/20061002-newsletter.xml#doc_chap3
If I am an idiot, then all gentoo dev's are too.
Sorry, my dearest fellow dev's, but this is #paludis people's logic and of
course they are wrong
On 15:39 Wed 17 Sep , Stroller wrote:
> Finally, I might add that the log we've seen posted was taken without any
> context. Perhaps the user is known on the channel for his idiocy, for
> winding the devs up, for asking stupid questions on a daily basis and not
> listening to advice given?
Vaeth wrote:
Could you please use a mail client which insert correctly the fields
"In-Reply-To" ans "Reference" ?
Thanks for the hint, I was not aware of this. But unfortunately, it
appears that it is not just a question of the mail client:
I am subsribed to the list as post-only (for several r
> Could you please use a mail client which insert correctly the fields
> "In-Reply-To" ans "Reference" ?
Thanks for the hint, I was not aware of this. But unfortunately, it
appears that it is not just a question of the mail client:
I am subsribed to the list as post-only (for several reasons whic
On 17 Sep 2008, at 00:27, b.n. wrote:
...
In any case, even if r0bertz is a clueless idiot, the only sane
approach is even in this case to calmly and rationally explain (or
providing links to information) why what he was doing was, in your
opinion, wrong.
To be completely fair, if you de
Dale writes:
> kashani wrote:
> > Dale wrote:
[Google stores emails forever, reads them, may combine the data with your
google searches, can create user profiles]
> >> But isn't this true of any ISP or email host?
No!
I guess about all of them have privacy statements that do not allow this. I
Also remember this - Linus has a list devoted solely to _his_ project, which
_he_ administers; therefore, he can pretty much say what he wants on that
devoted list where for all intents and purposes _he is king_.
Unlike this list which is not devoted to paladius or portage, or anything else
oth
Am Wednesday 17 September 2008 15:04:19 schrieb Alan McKinnon:
> I had thought of that, but I'm shying away from it - the admin load of
> supporting that many user passwords is crippling. The users forget their
> passwords or share them and write them on stciky notes...
What about one-time-passwor
On Wednesday 17 September 2008 14:26:50 Robert Bridge wrote:
> > Keys make for better security, but I would like it to be even better.
> > I also want to have my facts 100% straight - if I tell my boss "it
> > can't be done" I like to show research to back it up. There's nothing
> > worse than sayi
Am Mittwoch 17 September 2008 14:26:50 schrieb ext Robert Bridge:
> You could use keys AND passwords for the SSH. It should be trivial to
> set PAM up for it...
And even kerberos auth.
Bye...
Dirk
--
Dirk Heinrichs | Tel: +49 (0)162 234 3408
Configuration Manager | Fax: +4
Mr Leverton:
Please be advised that I have initiated a formal process requesting to have
you banned from this list by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is after many requests from others for you to calm down on the list, and
two private mails from myself asking the same, both of which you have not
answer
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 14:21:41 +0200
Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 September 2008 13:16:57 Jil Larner wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > You cannot. The reason for this is simple : you can copy as many
> > times as you wish it your private key in any place. Even if you
> > were a
On Wednesday 17 September 2008 13:16:57 Jil Larner wrote:
> Hello,
>
> You cannot. The reason for this is simple : you can copy as many times
> as you wish it your private key in any place. Even if you were able to
> check-up that a private key is passphrase-protected, it wouldn't mean
> every sing
At Wed, 17 Sep 2008 18:24:04 +1200 Kent Fredric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 6:21 PM, Kent Fredric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
> Oh wait, my confusion. You were possibly referring explicitly to whom should
> and should not be on the linux dev ml.
>
> ( If otherwise,
At Wed, 17 Sep 2008 07:33:11 +0100 David Leverton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 September 2008 00:50:42 Allan Gottlieb wrote:
>> Rather, "It is less objectionable for people who have accomplished a
>> very great deal and have greatly improved the computing environment
>> for the mem
Hello,
You cannot. The reason for this is simple : you can copy as many times
as you wish it your private key in any place. Even if you were able to
check-up that a private key is passphrase-protected, it wouldn't mean
every single copy of that key is protected so. And the interest of the
private
Hello!
This is the script I use to start my VirtualBox:
#if you previously loaded the driver, you don't need
#the following line.
modprobe vboxdrv
tunctl -t tap1 -u root
brctl addbr br0
ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0 promisc
brctl ad
Could you please use a mail client which insert correctly the fields
"In-Reply-To" ans "Reference" ?
--
Nicolas Sebrecht
David Leverton wrote:
Because allowing him to viciously attack us over, and over, and over, and
over, and over again is not acceptable.
I have been trying to bite my tongue but I have to ask this. Is what
you are doing any better? It's not something I want a answer to either
becaus
Matthias Bethke wrote:
> > > I'd say the vast majority of chroot jails are there for nothing
> > > else but security.
> >
> > Alan Cox: "chroot is not and never has been a security tool", see e.g.
> > http://kerneltrap.org/Linux/Abusing_chroot
>
> No disrespect to Mr. Cox but a silly argument s
On Wednesday 17 September 2008 10:01:43 Vaeth wrote:
> > The new version of Y fails to compile, so when X is compiled it only
> > has the old version of Y to work with. It may compile OK but not work
> > or feature a security bug.
>
> That's not the real risk: Since any sane user will of course che
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008, Stroller wrote:
>
> The risk is that you want to install X that depends upon Y.
>
> The ebuild for X states that version >1.2.3 of Y must be used because
> there's a bug in 1.2.2.
>
> The new version of Y fails to compile, so when X is compiled it only
> has the old version
Hi all,
I think I'm barking up an impossible tree, but it's worth asking.
Scenario:
I have an sshd-enabled jump box catering for 100+ users. They all use ssh keys
and we ask them all nicely to passphrase-protect the private key and pretend
that we enforce this. Keys are in use because the admi
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008, Matthias Bethke wrote:
> [...] that in any halfway sane router these NAT problems are not an
> issue. And with many routers running Linux today so you can even get a
> shell and check iptables... :)
We are obviously talking about a different price category of routers.
Most r
On Wednesday 17 September 2008, 06:18, Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 17:07, Hal Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Marc Joliet wrote:
> >> Am Tue, 16 Sep 2008 23:25:02 +0200
> >> schrieb pat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > I also installed VirtualBox, however when the Gentoo wiki
64 matches
Mail list logo
