On 21.07.2010 5:46, James wrote:
I can get X(kde 4.4) to start and run without a xorg.conf file
but at the wrong screen resolution. (1600x1200) instead
of 1920x1280, as it was before. Every attempt to
edit the old xorg.conf or roll a new xorg.conf with the new
2.6.34-gentoo-r1 kernel
On 07/21/2010 04:46 AM, James wrote:
hello,
I can get X(kde 4.4) to start and run without a xorg.conf file
but at the wrong screen resolution. (1600x1200) instead
of 1920x1280, as it was before. Every attempt to
edit the old xorg.conf or roll a new xorg.conf with the new
HiI've just switched to gcc 4.3.4 from 4.1.2 using gcc-config tool. I don't wantto rebuild any package now. As time goes on my packages will be compiled withnew version. I hope that after a few month there will be only a number ofpackages not compiled with a new gcc. Then I want to recompile them
James wirel...@tampabay.rr.com writes:
hello,
I can get X(kde 4.4) to start and run without a xorg.conf file
but at the wrong screen resolution. (1600x1200) instead
of 1920x1280, as it was before. Every attempt to
edit the old xorg.conf or roll a new xorg.conf with the new
On Wednesday 21 July 2010 10:53:19 fajfu...@wp.pl wrote:
Hi
I've just switched to gcc 4.3.4 from 4.1.2 using gcc-config tool. I don't
want to rebuild any package now. As time goes on my packages will be
compiled with new version. I hope that after a few month there will be
only a number of
Hi,
when I use a - type ebuild which accesses the source from a GIT
repository this is stored under /usr/portage/distfiles/git-src/$PN
where $PN is the package name.
But one cannot look at the source files since these are in compressed
form.
How can I setup a directory with the
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Wednesday 21 July 2010 10:53:19 fajfu...@wp.pl wrote:
Hi
I've just switched to gcc 4.3.4 from 4.1.2 using gcc-config tool. I don't
want to rebuild any package now. As time goes on my packages will be
compiled with new version. I hope that after a few month there
Hi,
does anybody have more luck with firefox-3.6.7 playing flash videos?
I've tried libflashplayer.so (64 bit)
/usr/lib64/nsbrowser/plugins/libgnashplugin.so (64 bit)
nothing works or even crash firefox.
Since there are the well-known printing problem for CUPS-1.4.x
it's one of the worst
On 07/21/2010 03:22 AM, Dale wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Wednesday 21 July 2010 10:53:19 fajfu...@wp.pl wrote:
Hi
I've just switched to gcc 4.3.4 from 4.1.2 using gcc-config tool. I
don't
want to rebuild any package now. As time goes on my packages will be
compiled with new version.
On 07/21/2010 03:23 PM, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
Hi,
does anybody have more luck with firefox-3.6.7 playing flash videos?
I've tried libflashplayer.so (64 bit)
/usr/lib64/nsbrowser/plugins/libgnashplugin.so (64 bit)
nothing works or even crash firefox.
Since there are the well-known
Portage recently updated Perl from 5.10.1 to 5.12.1 (and later -r1).
However, a crapload of files still remain in
/usr/lib/perl5/{site_perl,vendor_perl}/5.10.1. I found out the hard way
after trying to emerge openoffice (and everyone knows how painful that
one is):
checking for required
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 08:04:54PM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Portage recently updated Perl from 5.10.1 to 5.12.1 (and later -r1).
However, a crapload of files still remain in
/usr/lib/perl5/{site_perl,vendor_perl}/5.10.1. I found out the hard way
after trying to emerge openoffice
On 07/21/2010 08:34 PM, Willie Wong wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 08:04:54PM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Portage recently updated Perl from 5.10.1 to 5.12.1 (and later -r1).
However, a crapload of files still remain in
/usr/lib/perl5/{site_perl,vendor_perl}/5.10.1. I found out the hard
On 06/23/2010 01:59 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Am 23.06.2010 00:27, schrieb Bill Longman:
- core i7 @ 1.6GHz gives me eight threads. The RAM is really fast, too,
so the overall system is very responsive. Great power savings stuff.
quite a plus with the box running for 10 hrs a day at
perl-cleaner --all
2010/7/22 Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de
On 07/21/2010 08:34 PM, Willie Wong wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 08:04:54PM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Portage recently updated Perl from 5.10.1 to 5.12.1 (and later -r1).
However, a crapload of files still remain in
On Wednesday 21 July 2010 20:33:42 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 07/21/2010 08:34 PM, Willie Wong wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 08:04:54PM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Portage recently updated Perl from 5.10.1 to 5.12.1 (and later -r1).
However, a crapload of files still remain in
On 07/21/2010 07:14 PM, Blackdream W wrote:
perl-cleaner --all
It's better to do perl-cleaner -p --all before to watch what can happen.
On Wednesday 21 July 2010 17:49:46 Bill Longman wrote:
And to play devil's advocate, I'll chime in with my experience. The 4.4
GCC, at least on AMD CPUs, creates noticeably faster code. I recompiled
all my packages after I upgraded to 4.4 and it was a noticeable
difference.
But, to make
Hi,
I would like to integrate Sender Policy Framework (SPF) with my
MTA (sendmail), but can not find any documentation for dealing
with SPF, Sendmail Gentoo.
I could install mail-filter/libspf2, but how can I make sendmail
use it? There are milters for SenderID, DKIM, or DK in portage
tree,
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 20:04:54 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
What is the user required to do after updating Perl? elogv doesn't
tell me anything about upgrading.
Really? I got this message when going from 5.10 to 5.12
WARN: setup
UPDATE THE PERL MODULES:
After updating dev-lang/perl you must
On Wednesday 21 July 2010 21:51:47 Jarry wrote:
Hi,
I would like to integrate Sender Policy Framework (SPF) with my
MTA (sendmail), but can not find any documentation for dealing
with SPF, Sendmail Gentoo.
I could install mail-filter/libspf2, but how can I make sendmail
use it? There
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Wednesday 21 July 2010 17:49:46 Bill Longman wrote:
And to play devil's advocate, I'll chime in with my experience. The 4.4
GCC, at least on AMD CPUs, creates noticeably faster code. I recompiled
all my packages after I upgraded to 4.4 and it was a noticeable
ebuild PATH TO ebuild file unpack
and then look at /var/tmp/portage//work/
but is there a direct way (or how does portage do this)?
I'm not sure how portage does this but the git directory is likely
bare which is why you don't see any branch files. Try: git clone
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday 21 July 2010 20:33:42 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 07/21/2010 08:34 PM, Willie Wong wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 08:04:54PM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Portage recently updated Perl from 5.10.1 to 5.12.1 (and later -r1).
On Wednesday 21 July 2010 23:14:35 cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
This is a painful process. It's enough to drive a sysadmin to drink or
(god forbid), to Windows. Portage can't help as the ebuild doesn't know
what you have installed. So you must run a script to go and dig out all
this crap
On 07/21/2010 12:39 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Wednesday 21 July 2010 17:49:46 Bill Longman wrote:
And to play devil's advocate, I'll chime in with my experience. The 4.4
GCC, at least on AMD CPUs, creates noticeably faster code. I recompiled
all my packages after I upgraded to 4.4 and it was
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 03:36:33PM -0500, Dale wrote
My last KDE upgrade made KDE a little faster here as well. It won't be
as fast as e17 tho. Since I upgraded gcc a little before that, I wasn't
sure if it was gcc building better code or KDE got rid of some garbage.
It is a little
To enable SPF on outgoing mail all you have to do is create a SPF record
and put it in your /var/bind/domain.tld.hosts file, assuming your using
Bind.
That's all I did and when I send email to Google its says...
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of ja...@jasoncarson.ca designates
On Thursday 22 July 2010 00:18:05 Bill Longman wrote:
On 07/21/2010 12:39 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Wednesday 21 July 2010 17:49:46 Bill Longman wrote:
And to play devil's advocate, I'll chime in with my experience. The 4.4
GCC, at least on AMD CPUs, creates noticeably faster code. I
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Thursday 22 July 2010 00:18:05 Bill Longman wrote:
On 07/21/2010 12:39 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Wednesday 21 July 2010 17:49:46 Bill Longman wrote:
And to play devil's advocate, I'll chime in with my experience. The 4.4
GCC, at least on AMD CPUs,
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday 21 July 2010 23:14:35 cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
This is a painful process. It's enough to drive a sysadmin to drink or
(god forbid), to Windows. Portage can't help as the ebuild doesn't know
what you have installed. So you
/var/log/messages has indicated a slew of XFS problems on an external
USB hard drive (see attachment). These look pretty fatal. Anybody
think the file system is recoverable?
Also, palimpsest is reporting (graphically) that my external hard drive is
about to die. Can I save it's report to a
On Donnerstag 22 Juli 2010, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday 21 July 2010 23:14:35 cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
This is a painful process. It's enough to drive a sysadmin to drink
or (god forbid), to Windows. Portage can't help as
33 matches
Mail list logo
