On 1/3/2011, at 7:12pm, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> ...
> Combine with GNU Screen to achieve what you want.
Not screen.
He's never used screen before, therefore he has no reason not to use tmux.
$ eix -I tmux
[I] app-misc/tmux
Available versions: 1.2 1.3 ~1.4 ** {debug vim-syntax}
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 02:14:04PM +0800, Thomas Yao wrote:
> I dislike gnome-do and I use synapse on ubuntu with another PC
> So I'm wondering is there any other good desktop search applications?
> Or how can I install synapse on gentoo?
> Thank you!
I've just committed gnome-extra/synapse to the
Jason Weisberger wrote:
I've had mine for a while now, so I wouldn't be surprised if 1.5 was
the correct voltage for your sticks. Double check the manufacturer's
website to be sure.
Yep, it appears they have made some changes. This is what the site says
now.
System Desktop
System Ty
On Tuesday 01 March 2011 23:14:12 Mick wrote:
> Ha! I remember on an old machine when in WinXP would rarely if ever
> crash, while in Gentoo would crash every time.
My machine is only about a year old, built by a specialist builder of high-
performance systems, so it shouldn't be experiencing har
I've had mine for a while now, so I wouldn't be surprised if 1.5 was the
correct voltage for your sticks. Double check the manufacturer's website to
be sure.
On Feb 28, 2011 2:06 AM, "Dale" wrote:
> Jason Weisberger wrote:
>>
>> I actually have 4 gigs of gskill DDR 3 1600 and from experience I ca
On Sunday 27 February 2011 23:34:09 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Sunday 27 February 2011 19:43:10 Mick wrote:
> > [...] when I had a failing memory module I would often end up with
> > corrupted files all over the place. Think about it, when the memory
> > gave up some write on disk function was inv
On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 21:51:00 +0100, pat wrote
> On Tue, 01 Mar 2011 12:31:47 -0800, walt wrote
> > On 03/01/2011 11:50 AM, pat wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > When using X.org with intel driver there's an error in log:
> > > FATAL: Module fbcon not found.
> >
> > I know nothing about Intel graphics, but my
Hi I have installed sys-fs/udev-151-r4 USE="extras -devfs-compat
-old-hd-rules (-selinux) -test" on an almost clean hardened stage3 and I
found that after rebooting it won't run. It could be a problem of the
.config but turns out it runs and works like a charm when started
manually. So my question
On 03/01/11 16:07, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Mar 2011 14:12:31 -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>
>> (I'll do an ebuild for reptyr in the next week or so if nobody beats me
>> to it.)
>
> It looks like somebody already has :)
>
> % eix reptyr
> * app-misc/reptyr [1]
> Available versio
On Tue, 01 Mar 2011 14:12:31 -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> (I'll do an ebuild for reptyr in the next week or so if nobody beats me
> to it.)
It looks like somebody already has :)
% eix reptyr
* app-misc/reptyr [1]
Available versions: (~)
Description: Reparent a running
On Tue, 01 Mar 2011 12:31:47 -0800, walt wrote
> On 03/01/2011 11:50 AM, pat wrote:
>
> >
> > When using X.org with intel driver there's an error in log:
> > FATAL: Module fbcon not found.
>
> I know nothing about Intel graphics, but my guess is that your
> kernel has no framebuffer console supp
On 03/01/2011 11:50 AM, pat wrote:
When using X.org with intel driver there's an error in log:
FATAL: Module fbcon not found.
I know nothing about Intel graphics, but my guess is that your kernel has no
framebuffer console support. It's a relatively new addition to the kernel
graphics config
Jarry writes:
> is there any way to move running (already started) process
> to background, and disconnect it from screen/terminal
> so that I could log off (without terminating the process)?
Ctrl-Z
bg
But I really suggest using screen for this. Then you can detach the shell
with Ctrl-A D, and
On 03/01/2011 08:56 PM, Jarry wrote:
Hi,
is there any way to move running (already started) process
to background, and disconnect it from screen/terminal
so that I could log off (without terminating the process)?
The cleanest way to do this is not with job control but with a tool like
"screen"
On 03/01/11 13:56, Jarry wrote:
> Hi,
> is there any way to move running (already started) process
> to background, and disconnect it from screen/terminal
> so that I could log off (without terminating the process)?
>
> Sometimes I start updating my server, but it keeps running
> for long time, an
On 03/01/2011 07:56:40 PM, Jarry wrote:
> Hi,
> is there any way to move running (already started) process
> to background, and disconnect it from screen/terminal
> so that I could log off (without terminating the process)?
>
> Sometimes I start updating my server, but it keeps running
> for long
On 03/01/11 10:56, Jarry wrote:
Hi,
is there any way to move running (already started) process
to background, and disconnect it from screen/terminal
so that I could log off (without terminating the process)?
Sometimes I start updating my server, but it keeps running
for long time, and I would li
Hi,
is there any way to move running (already started) process
to background, and disconnect it from screen/terminal
so that I could log off (without terminating the process)?
Sometimes I start updating my server, but it keeps running
for long time, and I would like to log out but I can not.
I k
>> I'm having trouble with this again. I get:
>>
>> # ls -l /var/cache/revdep-rebuild
>> total 424
>> -rwx-- 1 root portage 699 Feb 28 16:52 0_env.rr
>> -rwx-- 1 root portage 323445 Feb 28 16:38 1_files.rr
>> -rwx-- 1 root portage 34387 Feb 28 16:38 2_ldpath.rr
>> -rwx-- 1 root
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 7:55 AM, James wrote:
> free.fr> writes:
>
>
>> I'm starting to think about my next development desktop. One
>> question haunts me:is the BIOS still a fatality? Is there a
>> known and tested alternative available
>> UEFI? Open Firmware? coreboot? other? Experience welcom
On Tuesday 01 March 2011 15:23:38 James wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was not certain that this posting is OT, so
> I labeled it that way, to keep everyone
> happy by default. I've been scrounging
> newegg to build a fast (AMD_ATI) workstation
> that is also cost effect (much thanks to Dale).
>
> I'm a b
Good afternoon,
Staff set up openssh to direct users to a certain group members to a
chroot environment and these users will have access only to the server
using sftp protocol.
Put in the sshd_config file:
Match Group customers
ChrootDirectory% h
ForceCommand internal-sftp-l VERBOSE f
free.fr> writes:
> I'm starting to think about my next development desktop. One
> question haunts me:is the BIOS still a fatality? Is there a
> known and tested alternative available
> UEFI? Open Firmware? coreboot? other? Experience welcome
Well, I've been researching my next mobo too and
Hello,
I was not certain that this posting is OT, so
I labeled it that way, to keep everyone
happy by default. I've been scrounging
newegg to build a fast (AMD_ATI) workstation
that is also cost effect (much thanks to Dale).
I'm a bit obsessive, so be forewarned.
ISSUE:
Ati video (mux/mix)ing vi
In linux.gentoo.user, you wrote:
> On Sunday 27 February 2011 19:35:55 walt wrote:
>
>> I've used this product several times with perfect results (so far):
>>
>> http://gparted.sourceforge.net/livecd.php
>>
>> Of course if you already have a working linux machine you can install
>> gparted and us
On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 14:14 +0800, Thomas Yao wrote:
> I dislike gnome-do and I use synapse on ubuntu with another PC
> So I'm wondering is there any other good desktop search applications?
> Or how can I install synapse on gentoo?
> Thank you!
>
Synapse and it's dependencies are very unfriendly
Am 01.03.2011 11:23, schrieb alain.didierj...@free.fr:
>
>
> I'm starting to think about my next development desktop. One question haunts
> me:
> is the BIOS still a fatality? Is there a known and tested alternative
> available
> UEFI? Open Firmware? coreboot? other? Experience welcome
>
UEFI
What is with the default Gnome searchbar?
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 7:14 AM, Thomas Yao wrote:
> I dislike gnome-do and I use synapse on ubuntu with another PC
> So I'm wondering is there any other good desktop search applications?
> Or how can I install synapse on gentoo?
> Thank you!
>
> --
> Twi
I'm starting to think about my next development desktop. One question haunts me:
is the BIOS still a fatality? Is there a known and tested alternative available
UEFI? Open Firmware? coreboot? other? Experience welcome
29 matches
Mail list logo
