On Dec 20, 2011 2:58 AM, "Allan Gottlieb" wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 18 2011, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Dec 18 2011, Joshua Murphy wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Allan Gottlieb
wrote:
> >>> I get dependency problems in my normal update world that I can't
> >>> understand.
Mark Knecht wrote:
Hi Dale, We're operating in parallel today but using different tools.
OK, based on Stroller's responses to my DVD Movie backup thread (or
whatever it was called) I'm trying out dvdbackup + mkisofs +
growisofs. So far the best (as measured by my ease of getting through
it) we
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Dale wrote:
>
> This is mostly for Joerg Schilling since he is the list guru for ALL things
> DVD but others with nice answers can reply too. ;-) Anyway.
>
> I have been making movie DVDs. Yea, I figured it out. It took a while too.
> Thing is, when I get rea
This is mostly for Joerg Schilling since he is the list guru for ALL
things DVD but others with nice answers can reply too. ;-) Anyway.
I have been making movie DVDs. Yea, I figured it out. It took a while
too. Thing is, when I get ready to burn the DVD, I put in a nice shiney
new DVD+
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Alex Schuster wrote:
> Michael Mol writes:
>
>> And by "other", this time I mean "Windows".
>>
>> Has anyone done something like "Gentoo on mscc+Win32" or "Gentoo on
>> mingw+Win32"? Portage would kick the pants off of Cygwin's package
>> management.
>
> Have a loo
Michael Mol writes:
> And by "other", this time I mean "Windows".
>
> Has anyone done something like "Gentoo on mscc+Win32" or "Gentoo on
> mingw+Win32"? Portage would kick the pants off of Cygwin's package
> management.
Have a look at this thread:
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-user/msg_0c
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Paul Hartman
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
>>> And by "other", this time I mean "Windows".
>>>
>>> Has anyone done something like "Gentoo on mscc+Win32" or "Gentoo on
>>> ming
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 3:32 PM, András Csányi wrote:
> On 19 December 2011 21:04, Michael Mol wrote:
>> And by "other", this time I mean "Windows".
>>
>> Has anyone done something like "Gentoo on mscc+Win32" or "Gentoo on
>> mingw+Win32"? Portage would kick the pants off of Cygwin's package
>> m
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Paul Hartman
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
>> And by "other", this time I mean "Windows".
>>
>> Has anyone done something like "Gentoo on mscc+Win32" or "Gentoo on
>> mingw+Win32"? Portage would kick the pants off of Cygwin's package
On 19 December 2011 21:04, Michael Mol wrote:
> And by "other", this time I mean "Windows".
>
> Has anyone done something like "Gentoo on mscc+Win32" or "Gentoo on
> mingw+Win32"? Portage would kick the pants off of Cygwin's package
> management.
May I ask what would be the benefit of it? COLinux
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
> And by "other", this time I mean "Windows".
>
> Has anyone done something like "Gentoo on mscc+Win32" or "Gentoo on
> mingw+Win32"? Portage would kick the pants off of Cygwin's package
> management.
http://gentoocygwin.sourceforge.net/
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 2011-11-26 17:03, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>
>> Thanks for "quoting" me, Michael ... but I also googled that command
>> somewhere ... not my idea ... ;-)
>
> Just went to that URL to cut and paste the command, the mentioned one
And by "other", this time I mean "Windows".
Has anyone done something like "Gentoo on mscc+Win32" or "Gentoo on
mingw+Win32"? Portage would kick the pants off of Cygwin's package
management.
--
:wq
Am 2011-11-26 17:03, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> Thanks for "quoting" me, Michael ... but I also googled that command
> somewhere ... not my idea ... ;-)
Just went to that URL to cut and paste the command, the mentioned one
doesn't work!
My make.conf shows this comment/command:
gcc -march=n
On Sun, Dec 18 2011, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 18 2011, Joshua Murphy wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
>>> I get dependency problems in my normal update world that I can't
>>> understand. The entire output is below.
>>>
>>> As far as I can tell gnome-2
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 12:15 AM, Dale wrote:
> Pandu Poluan wrote:
>>
>>
>> Kind of like what I always do when I switch from -march=nocona to
>> -march=native. (Usually I use -march=nocona to ensure seamless VM migration
>> on my XenServer-equipped boxen, but for some VMs, i.e., those requiring m
I use 'awesome', another tiling wm. No need to base it off of gnome or
kde...Haven't tried xmonad, though.
On Dec 19, 2011 8:44 AM, "jorge espada" wrote:
> Hi, I'm thinking of giving a try to Xmonad X11/window manager... anyone
> has experience or recommendations.
> Should I use kde or gnome as
Hi, I'm thinking of giving a try to Xmonad X11/window manager... anyone has
experience or recommendations.
Should I use kde or gnome as base.. or relay 100% on xmonad
Thanks
Jorge E. Espada
On 12/18/2011 05:34 PM, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
# /etc/portage/package.mask:
# GNOME 3.2 stuff
=gnome-extra/sushi-0.2.1
Just working from memory here. Try removing the version number:
gnome-extra/sushi
On 12/18/2011 10:49 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Just like with any other optimization switch, there can be bugs. If
Gentoo says it doesn't support graphite, then I'd stay away from it
because Gentoo devs might not listen to your bug reports if you use
it.
I've been using gcc with graphite sup
Am 19.12.2011 12:01, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> Built my kernel for a start, runs fine.
> Considering to emerge world after a nice backup ;-)
correction: emerge system for a start ... sure ...
Am 18.11.2011 01:04, schrieb Neil Bothwick:
> If you're feeling adventurous, GCC 4.6, currently masked for
> testing, has specific -march options for the i7 and Sandybridge i7,
> according to the Gentoo Wiki CFLAGS page.
Being adventurous now.
compiled sys-devel/gcc-4.6.2, and set
CFLAGS="-O2 -
Raffaele BELARDI wrote:
> On 12/16/2011 10:12 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> >
> > Dual layer DVDs will only work, if the layer break is at the right place.
> >
> > I so far have not been able to get the layer break value from the IFO file.
> >
> > You need to use cdrecord -atip to get the layer
On Dec 19, 2011 1:18 PM, "Dale" wrote:
>
> Pandu Poluan wrote:
>>
>>
>> Kind of like what I always do when I switch from -march=nocona to
-march=native. (Usually I use -march=nocona to ensure seamless VM migration
on my XenServer-equipped boxen, but for some VMs, i.e., those requiring me
to wring
24 matches
Mail list logo
