On Thursday 04 Apr 2013 14:57:38 João Matos wrote:
> Everything is working ok now. :)
>
> Next time I'll keep in mind looking at "eselect new".
Best you try:
eselect news read new
or
eselect news list
if you want to list them all.
--
Regards,
Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a
On 2013-04-03 6:28 PM, Mick wrote:
On Wednesday 03 Apr 2013 20:46:37 Bruce Hill wrote:
Therefore, all's well that's still working! And AFAIR, on at least 2 of
those machines, the 70-persistent-net.rules was never something I did
manually.
Right, it used to be auto-generated by udev scripts.
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 09:07:00AM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2013-04-04 5:13 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > I gets so bad that people are starting to make shit up to be worried
> > about, instead of just reading the simple document that is right in
> > front of their eyes that already fully and c
But what confuses me about that linked page is that from what I've heard
from others here, option 1 - which is the option I think I'd prefer -
requires more than just symlinking 80-net-name-slot.rules to
/dev/null...? Apparently you should also create your own
70-my-net-names.rules - but I've h
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 01:32:23PM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
> But what confuses me about that linked page is that from what I've heard
> from others here, option 1 - which is the option I think I'd prefer -
> requires more than just symlinking 80-net-name-slot.rules to
> /dev/null...? Apparently
On 2013-04-05 2:41 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 01:32:23PM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
But what confuses me about that linked page is that from what I've heard
from others here, option 1 - which is the option I think I'd prefer -
requires more than just symlinking 80-net-name-sl
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 01:41:28PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 01:32:23PM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
> > But what confuses me about that linked page is that from what I've heard
> > from others here, option 1 - which is the option I think I'd prefer -
> > requires more than
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 01:41:28PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
>
> Neither of these is needed if you want to have your own names,
> because naming the interfaces yourself in /etc/uev/70-net-names.rules or
> whatever you call the file overrides udev's predictable names.
>
> If people are using eth
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 02:38:21PM -0500, Bruce Hill wrote:
> Just dealing with one server and my Linux router, they've been updated to
> sys-fs/udev-200 and are both still using the same
> /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules file they've had for over a year,
> which was working with udev-171
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 02:58:02PM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
> I'd still like to know why the contents of my current rules file differs
> so much from the examples I've seen... ie, the two extra items that are
> in mine ('DRIVERS==' and 'KERNEL=='), and the missing one
> ('ACTION==')... and whethe
of `emerge -pqv '=dev-
lang/v8-3.16.14.9-r1'`.
* The complete build log is located at '/var/log/portage/dev-
lang:v8-3.16.14.9-r1:20130405-202806.log'.
* For convenience, a symlink to the build log is located at
'/tmp/portage/dev-lang/v8-3.16.14.9-r1/temp/build.log'.
*
be killed by PaX kernels.
>
> * ERROR: dev-lang/v8-3.16.14.9-r1 failed (compile phase):
>
> * (no error message)
>
> *
>
> * Call stack:
>
> * ebuild.sh, line 93: Called src_compile
>
> * environment, line 2778: Called die
>
> * The specific snippet of cod
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 03:11:39PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 02:38:21PM -0500, Bruce Hill wrote:
> > Just dealing with one server and my Linux router, they've been updated to
> > sys-fs/udev-200 and are both still using the same
> > /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.ru
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Hello list,
>
>
>
> Today's update wanted to move v8 up from 3.15.11.15 to 3.16.14.9-r1 but the
> emerge failed. Here are the last few lines of console output (well, the
> first of these is very long - sorry; it ends with "--end-group"):
>
>
On Friday 05 April 2013 22:52:57 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> But why are you even updating a dependency? Makes no sense at all. Or do
> you just love randomly breaking stuff?
As if I would. I synced and updated world but v8 failed. I showed you what
happened to further attempts to get it upgra
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 01:41:28PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote
> If people are using ethx names and getting away with it it is probably
> because they are loading the drivers as modules, or by chance the kernel
> is initializing the cards in the order they expect. There is no
> guarantee that will
What user interface exist for gnupg for XFCE4 ?
--
Joseph
Hi,
due the lack of space on my desktop I decided to add a Perixx
Peripad 501 Track Pad to my Gentoo Linux.
The device came neither with a userguide nor a driver. The according
webpage of Perixx does not offer both.
According to Xorg.0.log and without any additional tasks, X11 recognized this
p
18 matches
Mail list logo
