-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 05/21/2014 01:56 PM, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> Thanks for the explanation.
>
> Just to double check I understood it correctly, there's no need to put
> the list of kernel modules into /etc/conf.d/modules any longer, because
> udev is aware of th
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 10:10 PM, wrote:
> I run a script that syncs portage, updates @world, depcleans, revdep-rebuild
> and finally runs dispatch-conf -- about once weekly. Keeps my system in fine
> trim. :)
This one is a gem - I forget where I saw it (likely planet, but maybe
it was on a list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 22/05/14 09:20, wraeth wrote:
> Just a quick suggestion to help rule it out: try booting a LiveCD or other
> "one-size-fits-most" medium and seeing if your full memory is registering
> there. If it is, then it's not a hardware malfunction; if it
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 04:49:57PM +0300, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> On 05/20/2014 10:13 PM, Matti Nykyri wrote:
> > On May 20, 2014, at 14:49, Alexander Kapshuk
> > mailto:alexander.kaps...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >> On 05/20/2014 02:40 PM, Hunter Jozwiak wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
wraeth wrote:
>
>
> On 22/05/14 07:37, Alex Schuster wrote:
> > Does this ring any bells? I'm out of ideas. Except than pulling out
the 4
> > GB, or trying another mainboard.
>
> Just a quick suggestion to help rule it out: try booting a LiveCD or other
> "one-size-fits-most" medium and seeing if y
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 22/05/2014 00:41, David Abbott wrote:
>> Hi Everyone,
>> We are putting together this months GMN [1] Looking for some content
>> to add to the "Tip of the month" section.
>> Regards
>> David
>>
>> [1] http://blogs.gentoo.org/news
>>
>
> This month has been a treasure trove
Last year there was an enormous thread on how to maintain gentoo system
(portage tools etc) - was this ever summarised anywhere?
BillK
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 22/05/14 07:37, Alex Schuster wrote:
> Does this ring any bells? I'm out of ideas. Except than pulling out the 4
> GB, or trying another mainboard.
Just a quick suggestion to help rule it out: try booting a LiveCD or other
"one-size-fits-most"
On 05/21/14 08:00, Todd Goodman wrote:
* wirel...@tampabay.rr.com [140519 21:25]:
[SNIP]
It never tries to boot. Grub just sits there withe phrase (did not copy
it down) where it says what version it will boot on the screen
and it does nothing (locked up?) I have to or push
a manual reset. It
On 22/05/2014 00:41, David Abbott wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
> We are putting together this months GMN [1] Looking for some content
> to add to the "Tip of the month" section.
> Regards
> David
>
> [1] http://blogs.gentoo.org/news
>
This month has been a treasure trove of such things here on gentoo-
Hi Everyone,
We are putting together this months GMN [1] Looking for some content
to add to the "Tip of the month" section.
Regards
David
[1] http://blogs.gentoo.org/news
--
David Abbott (dabbott)
Gentoo Foundation Secretary
http://dev.gentoo.org/~dabbott/
Hi there!
So I installed another 4 GiB RAM into a Gentoo amd64 system that had 4 GiB
already. But it still sees only 4 GiB, not 8 GiB:
leela ~ # uname -a
Linux leela 3.6.11-gentoo #3 SMP Mon Feb 4 15:37:48 CET 2013 x86_64 AMD
A6-3500 APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
leela
Am 21.05.2014 21:44, schrieb Tom H:
> The answer is "no" unless you want to apply different perms to "/dev/shm".
I don't have an idea why I should want to do that so I removed the line
for now. Thanks.
Stefan
On Wed, 21 May 2014 14:33:30 -0400
Hunter Jozwiak wrote:
> I commented that out for the purposes of having it in the email as a
> sort of example. It isn't actually commented I was in the file. So
> having the x86 and the ~x86 in the same variable would make a safe
> portage solution?
Yes; it al
On Wednesday 21 May 2014 20:44:04 Tom H wrote:
> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger
wrote:
> > Am 21.05.2014 15:31, schrieb Tom H:
> >> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 6:32 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger
wrote:
> >>> Do I still need these lines .. especially with a modern
> >>> systemd/gno
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 21.05.2014 15:31, schrieb Tom H:
>> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 6:32 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>>>
>>> Do I still need these lines .. especially with a modern
>>> systemd/gnome3-environment?
>>>
>>> # glibc 2.2 and above expects
On Wednesday 21 May 2014 18:56:49 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> On 05/18/2014 04:05 AM, Jonathan Callen wrote:
> > On 05/15/2014 03:50 PM, Mick wrote:
> > > On Thursday 15 May 2014 14:24:57 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> > >> On 05/15/2014 11:39 AM, Stroller wrote:
> > >>> On Wed, 14 May 2014, at 12:36 pm
> On May 21, 2014, at 13:33, Tom Wijsman wrote:
>
> On Wed, 21 May 2014 13:02:46 -0400
> Hunter Jozwiak wrote:
>
>> Hi all. I made the following in /etc/portage/make.conf
>> #ACCEPT_LICENS="*"
>> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86"
>> Save and exit.
>> To double check, I ran:
>> #emerge --info | grep -i a
On 05/18/2014 04:05 AM, Jonathan Callen wrote:
> On 05/15/2014 03:50 PM, Mick wrote:
> > On Thursday 15 May 2014 14:24:57 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> >> On 05/15/2014 11:39 AM, Stroller wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 14 May 2014, at 12:36 pm, Alexander Kapshuk
> > wrote:
> >> ?
> >> If you like to ch
Am 21.05.2014 15:31, schrieb Tom H:
> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 6:32 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>>
>> Do I still need these lines .. especially with a modern
>> systemd/gnome3-environment?
>>
>> # glibc 2.2 and above expects tmpfs to be mounted at /dev/shm for
>> # POSIX shared memory (shm_open
On Wed, 21 May 2014 13:02:46 -0400
Hunter Jozwiak wrote:
> Hi all. I made the following in /etc/portage/make.conf
> #ACCEPT_LICENS="*"
> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86"
> Save and exit.
> To double check, I ran:
> #emerge --info | grep -i accept
> ACCEPT_LICENSES="* -@EULA"
> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86 ~x86"
>
Hi all. I made the following in /etc/portage/make.conf
#ACCEPT_LICENS="*"
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86"
Save and exit.
To double check, I ran:
#emerge --info | grep -i accept
ACCEPT_LICENSES="* -@EULA"
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86 ~x86"
The way it looks, the file just appended what I want to the Portage
default.
> What would you recommend? Thanks.
I always use emerge -uDNav @world --with-bdeps=y --keep-going=y, as I
want to update *all* packages on my system. What's the point in keeping
on the system some packages that are deliberately not updated?
Hi all. Is it possible to deploy a Digital Ocean rig and have it do
distcc compiling? If so, is there documentation on it, and where?
On Wednesday 21 May 2014 10:28:58 I wrote:
> Still hoping to find a font editor though, to replace that zero.
Found one: http://sourceforge.net/projects/nafe/postdownload?source=dlp
I've used it to remove the oblique stroke from the zero character and slope
its shoulders. The result's not very
On 05/20/2014 11:56 PM, yac wrote:
> On Tue, 20 May 2014 14:49:17 +0300
> Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
>
>> Here's what I usually run when updating the world.
>> Long version: emerge --ask --update --deep --with-bdeps=y --newuse
>> @world With '--with-bdeps=y' set in the file shown below:
>> grep bdep
On 05/20/2014 10:13 PM, Matti Nykyri wrote:
> On May 20, 2014, at 14:49, Alexander Kapshuk
> mailto:alexander.kaps...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>> On 05/20/2014 02:40 PM, Hunter Jozwiak wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:*Alexander Kapshuk [mailto:alexander.kaps...@gmail.com]
>>> *Sent:* Tuesday,
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 6:32 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>
> Do I still need these lines .. especially with a modern
> systemd/gnome3-environment?
>
> # glibc 2.2 and above expects tmpfs to be mounted at /dev/shm for
> # POSIX shared memory (shm_open, shm_unlink).
> # (tmpfs is a dynamically e
* wirel...@tampabay.rr.com [140519 21:25]:
[SNIP]
> It never tries to boot. Grub just sits there withe phrase (did not copy
> it down) where it says what version it will boot on the screen
> and it does nothing (locked up?) I have to or push
> a manual reset. It never tries to load the kernel.
Do I still need these lines .. especially with a modern
systemd/gnome3-environment?
->
# glibc 2.2 and above expects tmpfs to be mounted at /dev/shm for
# POSIX shared memory (shm_open, shm_unlink).
# (tmpfs is a dynamically expandable/shrinkable ramdisk, and will
# use almost no memory if not
On Sat, 17 May 2014 02:17:17 -0500, Dale wrote:
> I'm just curious. Just reply and let me know what you use. I think I
> need to change mine to something better.
For monospace, Source Code Pro [1] (media-fonts/source-pro).
For proportional, I prefer Helvetica (non-free) but among free options
On Wednesday 21 May 2014 02:22:21 Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 12:23:53PM +0200, David Haller wrote
>
> > emerge terminus-font
> >
> > might help. E.g.: setfont ter-132n. But that seems to need a
> > framebuffer, but you seem to have that ;)
> > I like default8x16 better though. A
32 matches
Mail list logo
