Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone else having a problem with bash?

On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 02:36:50 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > > I tried it [zsh], for exactly 10 seconds. My home/end keys didn't > > work. This gave me the impression of an unfinished project. Why on > > earth would anyone release a program after 1990 that doesn't know the > > home/end keys? :-/

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone else having a problem with bash?

On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 06:18:12 + (UTC), Martin Vaeth wrote: > > As a > > scripting language, Bash is probably better > > This is not true, either: Although finally bash took some of the > features of zsh (arrays, regular expression matching, etc.) there > are still many features missing in bash

[gentoo-user] linux kernel disabling irq 16

Hi folks. I am using 3.16.3-gentoo kernel from gentoo-sources and I get the following sometime after a boot: Jul 9 20:24:26 ccs.covici.com kernel: Disabling IRQ #16 This is preceeded by a call trace and on my consoles I see the additional message notody cares boot with irqpoll option. I did so

Re: [gentoo-user] adobe-flash-11.2.202.481 available; patches exploit

On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:14 PM, wrote: > That version is not available after a sync a couple of hours ago. > https://packages.gentoo.org/package/www-plugins/adobe-flash Try a different mirror.

Re: [gentoo-user] adobe-flash-11.2.202.481 available; patches exploit

OK, thanks -- its here now, just a slow mirror. Adam Carter wrote: > On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:14 PM, wrote: > > > That version is not available after a sync a couple of hours ago. > > > > https://packages.gentoo.org/package/www-plugins/adobe-flash > > Try a different mirror. > > -

Re: [gentoo-user] linux kernel disabling irq 16

how about not using an ancient kernel? 2015-07-10 11:54 GMT+02:00 : > Hi folks. I am using 3.16.3-gentoo kernel from gentoo-sources and I get > the following sometime after a boot: > Jul 9 20:24:26 ccs.covici.com kernel: Disabling IRQ #16 > This is preceeded by a call trace and on my consoles I

Re: [gentoo-user] linux kernel disabling irq 16

Would not do any good, the bug is still there under 3.19. Right now I am stuck with this one till I fix a bug in speakup. Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > how about not using an ancient kernel? > > 2015-07-10 11:54 GMT+02:00 : > > > Hi folks. I am using 3.16.3-gentoo kernel from gentoo-sources

[gentoo-user] Re: adobe-flash-11.2.202.481 available; patches exploit

On 09/07/15 17:41, Walter Dnes wrote: Adobe has released adobe-flash-11.2.202.481 for linux, and it is now available as an ebuild. Thanks to the devs for a quick turnaround with the ebuild. It is important to update, because a zero-day exploit was discovered in the 400 gigabytes of data from

[gentoo-user] Re: adobe-flash-11.2.202.481 available; patches exploit

On 10/07/15 14:00, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 09/07/15 17:41, Walter Dnes wrote: Adobe has released adobe-flash-11.2.202.481 for linux, and it is now available as an ebuild. Thanks to the devs for a quick turnaround with the ebuild. It is important to update, because a zero-day exploit was

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone else having a problem with bash?

On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 03:37:12PM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 09/07/15 15:24, wraeth wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 03:19:19PM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > >> On 09/07/15 14:48, Neil Bothwick wrote: > >>> On Thu, 09 Jul 2015 13:38:43 +0200, Stephan Müller wrote: > >>> > As a

Re: [gentoo-user] KP_Decimal

Le 09/07/2015 10:51, Neil Bothwick a écrit : On Thu, 09 Jul 2015 10:07:06 +0200, Roger Cahn wrote: Since a few days, when I type the point (.) on the numeric keypad, everytime, I obtain a window with: Impossible to launch the shortcut "KP_Decimal". The execution of the son process "." failed

Re: [gentoo-user] KP_Decimal

Le 10/07/2015 14:59, Roger Cahn a écrit : Le 09/07/2015 10:51, Neil Bothwick a écrit : On Thu, 09 Jul 2015 10:07:06 +0200, Roger Cahn wrote: Since a few days, when I type the point (.) on the numeric keypad, everytime, I obtain a window with: Impossible to launch the shortcut "KP_Decimal". T

Re: [gentoo-user] linux kernel disabling irq 16

On Friday 10 July 2015 06:51:43 cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: > Would not do any good, the bug is still there under 3.19. Right now I > am stuck with this one till I fix a bug in speakup. Or you could just do what it says and add "irqpoll" to your kernel command line. I've had it there for yonks

Re: [gentoo-user] linux kernel disabling irq 16

Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Friday 10 July 2015 06:51:43 cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: > > Would not do any good, the bug is still there under 3.19. Right now I > > am stuck with this one till I fix a bug in speakup. > > Or you could just do what it says and add "irqpoll" to your kernel command

[gentoo-user] Re: grub doesn't autoselect a kernel

> I have grub running on many Gentoo machines but on one of them it sits > on the kernel selection screen and doesn't autoboot even though the > menu says: > > "The highlighted entry will be booted automatically in 2 seconds." > > Nothing happens for any length of time but pressing Enter boots the

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone else having a problem with bash?

On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 09:16:01 +0100 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 02:36:50 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > > > > I tried it [zsh], for exactly 10 seconds. My home/end keys didn't > > > work. This gave me the impression of an unfinished project. Why on > > > earth would anyone relea

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: grub doesn't autoselect a kernel

On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Grant wrote: >> I have grub running on many Gentoo machines but on one of them it sits >> on the kernel selection screen and doesn't autoboot even though the >> menu says: >> >> "The highlighted entry will be booted automatically in 2 seconds." >> >> Nothing happen

[gentoo-user] Re: Anyone else having a problem with bash?

Neil Bothwick wrote: > > In one sub-thread we've so far managed to cover: > > Bash vs Zsh > Vim vs Emacs > Perl vs Python not to forget: POSIX vs Bash > What are your thoughts on KDE, kernel modules or USE=3D"-*"? ;-) Substitute "kernel modules" by Gnome (incl. systemd, policykit) and add topic

[gentoo-user] Re: KP_Decimal

Roger Cahn club-internet.fr> writes: > Since a few days, when I type the point (.) on the numeric > keypad Have you tried another (differnt make/model) keyboard? If you get the same problem,it is software related, if it goes away, then you are good to go. hth, James

[gentoo-user] Re: Anyone else having a problem with bash?

On 10/07/15 18:00, Gevisz wrote: bindkey '^[[7~' beginning-of-line # Home (xterm) bindkey '^[[8~' end-of-line# End (xterm) lol... are these guys serious? It's 2015...

[gentoo-user] google

Do you folks notice that google is triying to control the way we live?!

[gentoo-user] Re: google

On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 1:29 AM, behrouz khosravi wrote: > Do you folks notice that google is triying to control the way we live?! > belive me or not, sometimes I feel I am living in the 1984 novel ?!

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: google

> On Jul 10, 2015, at 5:00 PM, behrouz khosravi wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 1:29 AM, behrouz khosravi > wrote: > Do you folks notice that google is triying to control the way we live?! > > belive me or not, sometimes I feel I am living in the 1984 nov

Re: [gentoo-user] google

On 10/07/2015 22:59, behrouz khosravi wrote: > Do you folks notice that google is triying to control the way we live?! Come on. Get real. Or grow up. -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: google

On Friday 10 Jul 2015 22:28:24 Alec Ten Harmsel wrote: > > On Jul 10, 2015, at 5:00 PM, behrouz khosravi > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 1:29 AM, behrouz khosravi > > wrote: Do you folks notice that google > > is triying to control the way we li

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone else having a problem with bash?

Am Fri, 10 Jul 2015 20:39:05 +0300 schrieb Nikos Chantziaras : > On 10/07/15 18:00, Gevisz wrote: > > bindkey '^[[7~' beginning-of-line # Home (xterm) > > bindkey '^[[8~' end-of-line# End (xterm) > > lol... are these guys serious? > > It's 2015... What

Re: [gentoo-user] google

On Sat, 11 Jul 2015 01:29:30 +0430, behrouz khosravi wrote: > Do you folks notice that google is triying to control the way we live?! Unlike Amazon, Facebook, Microsoft, Apple et al I suppose? -- Neil Bothwick One-seventh of your life is spent on Monday. pgpAC29YeIqpI.pgp Description: OpenP

Re: [gentoo-user] google

http://www.instructables.com/id/Aluminum-Foil-Hat/ On 2015-07-11 00:25, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Sat, 11 Jul 2015 01:29:30 +0430, behrouz khosravi wrote: Do you folks notice that google is triying to control the way we live?! Unlike Amazon, Facebook, Microsoft, Apple et al I suppose?

Re: [gentoo-user] linux kernel disabling irq 16

On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 6:41 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > how about not using an ancient kernel? > > 2015-07-10 11:54 GMT+02:00 : >> >> Hi folks. I am using 3.16.3-gentoo kernel from gentoo-sources and I get >> the following sometime after a boot: I'd hardly call 3.16 ancient, but it isn't

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: google

On 11/07/15 05:54, Mick wrote: > On Friday 10 Jul 2015 22:28:24 Alec Ten Harmsel wrote: >>> On Jul 10, 2015, at 5:00 PM, behrouz khosravi >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 1:29 AM, behrouz khosravi >> > wrote: Do you folks notice that google >>> is tr

Re: [gentoo-user] google

> Unlike Amazon, Facebook, Microsoft, Apple et al I suppose? > > I am sorry, google was on my mind the moment I posted!, I hate the amazon advertizements!

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: google

> You are not googles users ... YOU are the product they sell > > Brilliant !

Re: [gentoo-user] linux kernel disabling irq 16

Rich Freeman wrote: > On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 6:41 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann > wrote: > > how about not using an ancient kernel? > > > > 2015-07-10 11:54 GMT+02:00 : > >> > >> Hi folks. I am using 3.16.3-gentoo kernel from gentoo-sources and I get > >> the following sometime after a boot: > > I

[gentoo-user] Re: Anyone else having a problem with bash?

Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 10/07/15 18:00, Gevisz wrote: >> bindkey '^[[7~' beginning-of-line # Home (xterm) >> bindkey '^[[8~' end-of-line# End (xterm) > > lol... are these guys serious? > > It's 2015... ... and yet the way of handling special keys i