Jeremi Piotrowski gmail.com> writes:
> In general I have not had any problems setting up similar gentoo systems
> running pure btrfs in raid1/single mode. Those systems, however, all have
> initramfs' - not that that's a bad thing but see above.
I too am also interested in booting a btrfs-raid1
> Paul Tobias gmail.com> writes:
> > It works, but a patched kernel is needed. Take a look at
> > https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-7275724.html The patch there was
> > still working on the latest kernel a while ago.
The patch from the forum thread does indeed work, and just reading it
makes
> my ideas is that LVM2 is not ready at the time of mounting partitions.
how can i do this?
I had the same problem on a system where scsi initialization was very slow.
Adding "rootdelay=30" to the kernel command line fixed it. The "30" is how
many seconds should the kernel wait before it starts mo
On Monday, August 10, 2015 8:59:27 AM Cor Legemaat wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-08-06 at 23:41 -0400, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Thursday, August 06, 2015 7:04:27 AM Cor Legemaat wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2015-08-05 at 01:00 -0400, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday, August 04, 2015 8:18:43 PM
On Monday, August 10, 2015 2:02:20 PM Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 13:58:19 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>
> > > I've been using ~amd64 GCC on my MythTV boxes, which run mainly
> > > stable, for a long time. I would keep 4.8 installed too, just in case
> > > the odd package still doe
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Dale wrote:
> Peter Humphrey wrote:
>> On Monday 10 August 2015 09:13:01 Dale wrote:
>>
>>> I might add, sync is taking a LONG time again. Of course, my DSL is a
>>> bit slower than some folks. At least the bumpy road got smoothed out
>>> tho. It seems to be wo
Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Peter Humphrey
> wrote:
>> On Monday 10 August 2015 09:13:01 Dale wrote:
>>
>>> I might add, sync is taking a LONG time again. Of course, my DSL is a
>>> bit slower than some folks. At least the bumpy road got smoothed out
>>> tho. It see
Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Monday 10 August 2015 09:13:01 Dale wrote:
>
>> I might add, sync is taking a LONG time again. Of course, my DSL is a
>> bit slower than some folks. At least the bumpy road got smoothed out
>> tho. It seems to be working again. Maybe next sync will be back to
>> norm
Hello,
Just for grins, I'm thinking about installing a gentoo system
that is (~) testing and newer codes and setting gcc-.5.2 as the
default compiler. Anyone doing this yet? Will it mostly work
or should I wait? Workstation with lxqt-0.9x.
Hardened? What are the chances if it is set up (amd64) a
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Monday 10 August 2015 09:13:01 Dale wrote:
>
>> I might add, sync is taking a LONG time again. Of course, my DSL is a
>> bit slower than some folks. At least the bumpy road got smoothed out
>> tho. It seems to be working again. Mayb
On Monday 10 August 2015 09:13:01 Dale wrote:
> I might add, sync is taking a LONG time again. Of course, my DSL is a
> bit slower than some folks. At least the bumpy road got smoothed out
> tho. It seems to be working again. Maybe next sync will be back to
> normal.
I do one sync a day, of
Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 8:15 PM, Dale wrote:
>> I'm sure I'm not alone on monitoring -dev to see upcoming changes. I
>> noticed they switched to git or something and it seems to have caused a
>> bit of trouble.
> There are a few issues they're working through, but nothing rea
On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 13:58:19 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > I've been using ~amd64 GCC on my MythTV boxes, which run mainly
> > stable, for a long time. I would keep 4.8 installed too, just in case
> > the odd package still doesn't like 4.9. Ironically, on my MythTV
> > boxes, the only package t
On Monday 10 August 2015 13:03:14 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 11:32:01 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > Has anyone any advice on whether it's a good idea to add a keyword to
> > gcc-4.9.2 so that I can make progress here? This is a stable box and
> > I'd like to know whether this one
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 11:32:01 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>
> I've been using ~amd64 GCC on my MythTV boxes, which run mainly stable,
> for a long time. I would keep 4.8 installed too, just in case the odd
> package still doesn't like 4.9. Ironically, on my MythTV boxes, the
On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 11:32:01 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Has anyone any advice on whether it's a good idea to add a keyword to
> gcc-4.9.2 so that I can make progress here? This is a stable box and
> I'd like to know whether this one, rather central ~amd64 package would
> cause trouble.
I've
hello list,
Using grub2
i have gentoo box where i did a raid5 on 4 disks.
On the raid i created a lvm partition and created some logical volumes.
All is going fine.
But when rebooting the machine "sometimes" the lvm is not available and
the logic volumes did not get mounted.
I have to reboot the
Hello list,
I'm having trouble compiling xf86-video-virtualbox, and the bug report [1]
says that gcc-4.9 is required to compile it.
Has anyone any advice on whether it's a good idea to add a keyword to
gcc-4.9.2 so that I can make progress here? This is a stable box and I'd like
to know whethe
2015-08-10 10:55 GMT+02:00 Mickaël Bucas :
>
>
> 2015-08-10 2:15 GMT+02:00 Dale :
> >
> > Howdy,
> >
> > I'm sure I'm not alone on monitoring -dev to see upcoming changes. I
> > noticed they switched to git or something and it seems to have caused a
> > bit of trouble. At least I think it may hav
On Sunday 09 August 2015 21:05:07 Rich Freeman wrote:
> Whether you've already seen it or will see it in the future, I would
> expect the first rsync to be much longer. The git migration probably
> touched virtually every file in the tree in some way, which means that
> rsync is going to be modif
2015-08-10 2:15 GMT+02:00 Dale :
>
> Howdy,
>
> I'm sure I'm not alone on monitoring -dev to see upcoming changes. I
> noticed they switched to git or something and it seems to have caused a
> bit of trouble. At least I think it may have. I did my usual 'eix-sync
> && emerge -uvaDN world'. The
21 matches
Mail list logo
