Hi,
with one of the latest updates the Firefox plugin/extension
"Ghostery", which blocks trackers mutated:
Before all setting were handled local, now everything can only
be done by creating an account at https://www.ghostery.com.
This is definitely a move I dont want to support -- especially
Andreas K. Hüttel gentoo.org> writes:
> > U... nothing about what license it is released under
> Just read the web page, it's there.
> "The BeeGFS client module is licensed under the GPLv2. All other BeeGFS
> components are licensed under the BeeGFS EULA."
So how does that work on a
On Thursday 25 Feb 2016 13:23:52 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 25/02/2016 03:05, allan gottlieb wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 24 2016, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >> A finite subset of this package.use file will let skype install,
> >> followed of course by
> >> emerge skype.
> >>
> >> I arrived at this list the
On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 12:48:21 -0500, Tanstaafl wrote:
> > Excellent point about the license. Did the license stop zfs folks
> > from enjoying zfs? I know the zfs license stops some commercial folks
> > from deploy/using zfs. And zfs is not a routine choice in the
> > installation docs for
Am Freitag, 26. Februar 2016, 16:47:12 schrieb Tanstaafl:
> On 2/25/2016 5:03 PM, James wrote:
> > Long awaited.
> >
> > This smoking hot (many HPC scientist agree) distributed file
> > system will surely rock the cluster, container and Hi Performance
> > Computing
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>
> Yes, which is what I recommended. Don't block 4.1.x security/bugfix patches.
> Just block 4.2 and above.
>
++
4.1 is a longterm series, so if your goal is minimum disruption you
can stay on it until Sep 2017. I
On 26/02/16 18:47, Harry Putnam wrote:
First off, thanks to all posters for the excellent input
Nikos Chantziaras writes:
On 25/02/16 05:55, Harry Putnam wrote:
I'd like to stay on kernel-4.1.6, rather than keep installing the
newest version at each upgrade.
I'd
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2/26/2016 12:04 PM, James wrote:
>> Excellent point about the license. Did the license stop zfs folks
>> from enjoying zfs? I know the zfs license stops some commercial folks
>> from
On 2/26/2016 12:04 PM, James wrote:
> Excellent point about the license. Did the license stop zfs folks
> from enjoying zfs? I know the zfs license stops some commercial folks
> from deploy/using zfs. And zfs is not a routine choice in the installation
> docs for
On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 10:47:12 -0500
Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2/25/2016 5:03 PM, James wrote:
> > Long awaited.
> >
> > This smoking hot (many HPC scientist agree) distributed file
> > system will surely rock the cluster, container and Hi
On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 16:43:05 + (UTC)
James wrote:
[ about aprospos ]
> Looks like an alias to 'whatis'? 'whereis' still one of my favorite
> little tools.
It queries the whatis database differently depending on how it's called.
Think of the whatis database as
Tanstaafl libertytrek.org> writes:
> U... nothing about what license it is released under, and they want
> personal info from you to download the source...
> I'm not sure this is anything to jump up and down about yet...
agreed. bummer. Sometimes it takes time for the folks that put up
First off, thanks to all posters for the excellent input
> Nikos Chantziaras writes:
> On 25/02/16 05:55, Harry Putnam wrote:
>> I'd like to stay on kernel-4.1.6, rather than keep installing the
>> newest version at each upgrade.
>
> I'd instead recommend putting
>
>
walt gmail.com> writes:
> Have you noticed that you can find lots of stuff with 'apropos' that
> doesn't actually have a 'man' page? Here's an example:
# equery belongs apropos
* Searching for apropos ...
app-shells/bash-completion-2.1_p20141224-r1
On 2/25/2016 5:03 PM, James wrote:
> Long awaited.
>
> This smoking hot (many HPC scientist agree) distributed file
> system will surely rock the cluster, container and Hi Performance
> Computing worlds. [1] Now if I were only smart enough to get this
> puppy into
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 03:39:22 -0600, Dale wrote:
>
Mine here is in: /etc/portage/package.mask It's been there for a
long time. Maybe they are moving things again to something new but
it works here.
>>> Things that override global settings in make.conf,
On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 03:39:22 -0600, Dale wrote:
> >> Mine here is in: /etc/portage/package.mask It's been there for a
> >> long time. Maybe they are moving things again to something new but
> >> it works here.
> > Things that override global settings in make.conf, like package.mask,
> > go
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 15:47:32 -0600, Dale wrote:
>
>> Mine here is in: /etc/portage/package.mask It's been there for a long
>> time. Maybe they are moving things again to something new but it works
>> here.
> Things that override global settings in make.conf, like
18 matches
Mail list logo