Re: [gentoo-user] UEFI data corruption? [FIXED-FIXED]

2019-10-01 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Monday, 30 September 2019 21:01:28 BST Neil Bothwick wrote: > Are you setting UEFI to boot from systemd-bootx64.efi or from the kernel > image? If the former, you don't need a copy of the kernel in the ESP. I could run some tests to find out, but after throwing so much time and effort into re

Re: [gentoo-user] UEFI data corruption? [FIXED-FIXED]

2019-10-01 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 01 Oct 2019 10:05:23 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > Are you setting UEFI to boot from systemd-bootx64.efi or from the > > kernel image? If the former, you don't need a copy of the kernel in > > the ESP. > > I could run some tests to find out, but after throwing so much time and > effo

Re: [gentoo-user] UEFI data corruption? [FIXED-FIXED]

2019-10-01 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Tuesday, 1 October 2019 10:47:59 BST Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Tue, 01 Oct 2019 10:05:23 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > > Are you setting UEFI to boot from systemd-bootx64.efi or from the > > > kernel image? If the former, you don't need a copy of the kernel in > > > the ESP. > > > > I could

[gentoo-user] Globally disabling colour

2019-10-01 Thread Dr Rainer Woitok
Greetings, having freshly erm ... converted from Ubuntu to Gentoo and thus being an absolute Gentoo newbie I'm desparately looking for a way to get rid of all the colour in the output produced by "emerge" but also by "qlist", "eix", "e-file" and so on. Is there a way to globally configure thi

Re: [gentoo-user] Globally disabling colour

2019-10-01 Thread Arve Barsnes
On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 at 13:28, Dr Rainer Woitok wrote: > having freshly erm ... converted from Ubuntu to Gentoo and thus being an > absolute Gentoo newbie I'm desparately looking for a way to get rid of > all the colour in the output produced by "emerge" but also by "qlist", > "eix", "e-file" an

Re: [gentoo-user] Globally disabling colour

2019-10-01 Thread Mick
On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 at 12:29, Dr Rainer Woitok wrote: > > Greetings, > > having freshly erm ... converted from Ubuntu to Gentoo and thus being an > absolute Gentoo newbie I'm desparately looking for a way to get rid of > all the colour in the output produced by "emerge" but also by "qlist", > "

Re: [gentoo-user] UEFI data corruption? [FIXED-FIXED]

2019-10-01 Thread Mick
On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 at 12:01, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > On Tuesday, 1 October 2019 10:47:59 BST Neil Bothwick wrote: > > On Tue, 01 Oct 2019 10:05:23 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > > > Are you setting UEFI to boot from systemd-bootx64.efi or from the > > > > kernel image? If the former, you don't

Re: [gentoo-user] Globally disabling colour

2019-10-01 Thread HÃ¥kon Alstadheim
Den 01.10.2019 13:28, skrev Dr Rainer Woitok: Greetings, having freshly erm ... converted from Ubuntu to Gentoo and thus being an absolute Gentoo newbie I'm desparately looking for a way to get rid of all the colour in the output produced by "emerge" but also by "qlist", "eix", "e-file" an

Re: [gentoo-user] UEFI data corruption? [FIXED-FIXED]

2019-10-01 Thread Mick
On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 at 13:18, Mick wrote: > When using Secure Boot the UEFI firmware check the binaries to be > loaded have been signed by Microsoft. The 'SHA256 verified' message > indicates the systemd-boot binary is signed using a key which is > ultimately signed by Microsoft and is contained

Re: [gentoo-user] UEFI data corruption? [FIXED-FIXED]

2019-10-01 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Tuesday, 1 October 2019 15:32:27 BST Mick wrote: > On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 at 13:18, Mick wrote: > > When using Secure Boot the UEFI firmware check the binaries to be > > loaded have been signed by Microsoft. The 'SHA256 verified' message > > indicates the systemd-boot binary is signed using a key

Re: [gentoo-user] UEFI data corruption? [FIXED-FIXED]

2019-10-01 Thread Mick
On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 at 16:19, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > On Tuesday, 1 October 2019 15:32:27 BST Mick wrote: > > On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 at 13:18, Mick wrote: > > > When using Secure Boot the UEFI firmware check the binaries to be > > > loaded have been signed by Microsoft. The 'SHA256 verified' messag

Re: [gentoo-user] UEFI data corruption? [FIXED-FIXED]

2019-10-01 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Tuesday, 1 October 2019 18:47:25 BST Mick wrote: > As I understand it this ID must be the ID bootctl itself reports. > However, earlier bootctl versions do not have this set-default ID > subcommand. If you run bootctl with no arguments does it show up? No, it behaves the same as 'bootctl stat