On Monday, May 4, 2020 3:19 AM, antlists wrote:
> On 03/05/2020 22:46, Caveman Al Toraboran wrote:
>
> > On Sunday, May 3, 2020 6:27 PM, Jack ostrof...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
> > curious. how do people look at --layout=n2 in the
> > storage industry? e.g. do they ignore the
> > optimistic c
I wonder if any Gentoo dev is working on implementing this?
Has anyone tested it?
https://www.ventoy.net/en/index.html
I just read about it on ycombinator
curiously,
James
On Monday, May 4, 2020 2:50 AM, hitachi303
wrote:
> Am 03.05.2020 um 23:46 schrieb Caveman Al Toraboran:
>
> > so, in summary:
> > /\
> > | a 5-disk RAID10 is better than a 6-disk RAID10 |
> > | ONLY IF your data is WORTH LESS than 3,524.3 |
> > |
On Sunday, May 3, 2020 6:27 PM, Jack wrote:
> Minor point - you have one duplicate line there ". f f ." which is the
> second and last line of the second group. No effect on anything else in
> the discussion.
thanks.
> Trying to help thinking about odd numbers of disks, if you are still
> all
james wrote:
> On 5/3/20 8:47 PM, Dale wrote:
>> james wrote:
>>> I wonder if any Gentoo dev is working on implementing this?
>>>
>>> Has anyone tested it?
>>>
>>> https://www.ventoy.net/en/index.html
>>>
>>> I just read about it on ycombinator
>>>
>>>
>>> curiously,
>>> James
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
On Sun, May 03, 2020 at 09:04:27PM -0400, james wrote:
> Gentoo
> install-amd64-minimal-20200119T214502Z.iso
> livedvd-amd64-hardened-nomultilib-20170118.iso
>
> Let me know/post if there is a place actually download these iso files?
It seems like a LiveDVD image hasn't been built in
On 5/3/20 8:47 PM, Dale wrote:
james wrote:
I wonder if any Gentoo dev is working on implementing this?
Has anyone tested it?
https://www.ventoy.net/en/index.html
I just read about it on ycombinator
curiously,
James
I went here:
https://www.ventoy.net/en/isolist.html
If you scrol
james wrote:
> I wonder if any Gentoo dev is working on implementing this?
>
> Has anyone tested it?
>
> https://www.ventoy.net/en/index.html
>
> I just read about it on ycombinator
>
>
> curiously,
> James
>
>
I went here:
https://www.ventoy.net/en/isolist.html
If you scroll down the list,
On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 6:50 PM hitachi303
wrote:
>
> The only person I know who is running a really huge raid ( I guess 2000+
> drives) is comfortable with some spare drives. His raid did fail an can
> fail. Data will be lost. Everything important has to be stored at a
> secondary location. But th
Hi gentoo-user,
I'm attempting to configure a mid-range video card: the Radeon R7 370. Running
on the Pitcairn chipset and a member of the Southern Islands family, I am
surprised at the complexity of setting up the Radeon driver in comparison to its
NVIDIA counterpart.
I followed [1] car
On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 6:52 PM Mark Knecht wrote:
>
> On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 1:16 PM Rich Freeman wrote:
> >
> > Up until a few weeks ago I would have advised the same, but WD was
> > just caught shipping unadvertised SMR in WD Red disks. This is going
> > to at the very least impact your perfor
On 03/05/2020 22:46, Caveman Al Toraboran wrote:
On Sunday, May 3, 2020 6:27 PM, Jack wrote:
curious. how do people look at --layout=n2 in the
storage industry? e.g. do they ignore the
optimistic case where 2 disk failures can be
recovered, and only assume that it protects for 1
disk failure
On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 1:16 PM Rich Freeman wrote:
>
> On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 2:29 PM Mark Knecht wrote:
> >
> > I've used the WD Reds and WD Golds (no not sold) and never had any
problem.
> >
>
> Up until a few weeks ago I would have advised the same, but WD was
> just caught shipping unadvertis
Am 03.05.2020 um 23:46 schrieb Caveman Al Toraboran:
so, in summary:
/\
| a 5-disk RAID10 is better than a 6-disk RAID10 |
| ONLY IF your data is WORTH LESS than 3,524.3 |
| bucks. |
\
On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 5:32 PM antlists wrote:
>
> On 03/05/2020 21:07, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > I don't think you should focus so much on whether read=write in your
> > RAID. I'd focus more on whether read and write both meet your
> > requirements.
>
> If you think about it, it's obvious that rai
On Sunday, May 3, 2020 1:23 PM, Wols Lists wrote:
> For anything above raid 1, MAKE SURE your drives support SCT/ERC. For
> example, Seagate Barracudas are very popular desktop drives, but I guess
> maybe HALF of the emails asking for help recovering an array on the raid
> list involve them dying
On 03/05/2020 21:07, Rich Freeman wrote:
I don't think you should focus so much on whether read=write in your
RAID. I'd focus more on whether read and write both meet your
requirements.
If you think about it, it's obvious that raid-1 will read faster than it
writes - it has to write two copie
On 03/05/2020 18:55, Caveman Al Toraboran wrote:
On Sunday, May 3, 2020 1:23 PM, Wols Lists wrote:
For anything above raid 1, MAKE SURE your drives support SCT/ERC. For
example, Seagate Barracudas are very popular desktop drives, but I guess
maybe HALF of the emails asking for help recovering
On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 2:29 PM Mark Knecht wrote:
>
> I've used the WD Reds and WD Golds (no not sold) and never had any problem.
>
Up until a few weeks ago I would have advised the same, but WD was
just caught shipping unadvertised SMR in WD Red disks. This is going
to at the very least impact
On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 1:44 AM Caveman Al Toraboran
wrote:
>
> * RAID 1: fails to satisfy points (1) and (3)...
> this leaves me with RAID 10
Two things:
1. RAID 10 doesn't satisfy point 1 (read and write performance are
identical). No RAID implementation I'm aware of does.
2. Some RAID1
On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 10:56 AM Caveman Al Toraboran <
toraboracave...@protonmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sunday, May 3, 2020 1:23 PM, Wols Lists
wrote:
>
> > For anything above raid 1, MAKE SURE your drives support SCT/ERC. For
> > example, Seagate Barracudas are very popular desktop drives, but I gue
On Sat, May 02, 2020 at 10:12:08PM +0800, William Kenworthy wrote:
> I am afraid this is an ".. it depends" question.
>
Yes, I agree.
> If you work with large images or data sets, swap can be really handy.
> If you are doing a little programming, web browsing, reading email you
> will *probably
Caveman Al Toraboran wrote:
> On Sunday, May 3, 2020 1:23 PM, Wols Lists wrote:
>
>> For anything above raid 1, MAKE SURE your drives support SCT/ERC. For
>> example, Seagate Barracudas are very popular desktop drives, but I guess
>> maybe HALF of the emails asking for help recovering an array on
Dale wrote:
> tu...@posteo.de wrote:
>>
>> Hi Dale,
>>
>> I am now running kernel 5.6.9 (vanilla) and nvidia-driver 440.82-r3.
>>
>> Again, Blender cannot find the Optix related parts of the driver.
>> This package still does not work for me. As far as I can see,
>> the non-Optix specific things a
Dr Rainer Woitok wrote:
> I STRONGLY beg to disagree! The "~amd64" notation is used to ACCEPT a
> package even though it is (still) classified as UNSTABLE.
This is package-manager terminology which has much less states since
a package manager needs no fine distinctions about the reasons of
ac
Martin,
On Thursday, 2020-04-30 17:20:08 -, you wrote:
> ...
> >>=app-crypt/tpm2-tss-2.2.3-r1 ~amd64
>
> Ah! That explains it.
>
> > But this only means that I accept an unstable package here, not that
> > these versions are regarded stable.
>
> It is stabe according to the local
On 5/3/20 1:44 AM, Caveman Al Toraboran wrote:
[snip]...
so, we get the following combinations of
disk failures that, if happen, we won't
lose any data:
RAID0
--^--
RAID1 RAID1
--^-- --^--
F . . . < cases with
On Sunday, May 3, 2020 1:14 PM, Wols Lists wrote:
> > Q3: what are the future growth/shrinkage
> > options for a RAID10 setup? e.g. with
> > respect to these:
> >
> > 1. read/write speed.
> >
>
> iirc far is good for speed.
>
> > 2. tolerance guarantee towards failing
> >disks.
>
hi - i'm to setup my 1st RAID, and i'd appreciate
if any of you volunteers some time to share your
valuable experience on this subject.
my scenario
---
0. i don't boot from the RAID.
1. read is as important as write. i don't
have any application-specific scenario that
On 03/05/20 08:53, hitachi303 wrote:
> Nothing you asked but I had very bad experience with drives which spin
> down by themselves to save energy (mostly titled green or so).
Good catch!
For anything above raid 1, MAKE SURE your drives support SCT/ERC. For
example, Seagate Barracudas are very pop
On 03/05/20 06:44, Caveman Al Toraboran wrote:
> hi - i'm to setup my 1st RAID, and i'd appreciate
> if any of you volunteers some time to share your
> valuable experience on this subject.
>
> my scenario
> ---
>
> 0. i don't boot from the RAID.
>
> 1. read is as important as wri
Am 03.05.2020 um 07:44 schrieb Caveman Al Toraboran:
* RAIDs 4 to 6: fails to satisfy point (3)
since they are stuck with a fixed tolerance
towards failing disks (i.e. RAIDs 4 and 5
tolerate only 1 disk failure, and RAID 6
tolerates only 2).
As far as I remember th
32 matches
Mail list logo
