Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:02:48 -0600, Dale wrote:
>
>
>> I think most installs have the system set included in world for now but
>> that may change in the future. As I have posted on -dev, I see the
>> serious need for the sets but I wish to continue using the plain world
>
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:02:48 -0600, Dale wrote:
> I think most installs have the system set included in world for now but
> that may change in the future. As I have posted on -dev, I see the
> serious need for the sets but I wish to continue using the plain world
> and it update all the packages
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Dale wrote:
> Paul Hartman wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Dale wrote:
>>
>>> Paul Hartman wrote:
>>>
Hi,
I normally do "emerge -uDvN @world" (or in other words "emerge
--update --deep --verbose --newuse @world"). Right now, it tells
Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Dale wrote:
>
>> Paul Hartman wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I normally do "emerge -uDvN @world" (or in other words "emerge
>>> --update --deep --verbose --newuse @world"). Right now, it tells me
>>> this:
>>>
>>> Total: 0 packages, Size of
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Dale wrote:
> Paul Hartman wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I normally do "emerge -uDvN @world" (or in other words "emerge
>> --update --deep --verbose --newuse @world"). Right now, it tells me
>> this:
>>
>> Total: 0 packages, Size of downloads: 0 kB
>>
>> I also --depclean on
Paul Hartman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I normally do "emerge -uDvN @world" (or in other words "emerge
> --update --deep --verbose --newuse @world"). Right now, it tells me
> this:
>
> Total: 0 packages, Size of downloads: 0 kB
>
> I also --depclean on a regular basis to remove any unneeded packages.
> Right
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Willie Wong wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 11:10:44AM -0600, Paul Hartman wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Willie Wong wrote:
>> > Hum, I seem to have made an erroneous assumption.
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 11:38:05AM -0500, Willie Wong wrote
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 11:10:44AM -0600, Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Willie Wong wrote:
> > Hum, I seem to have made an erroneous assumption.
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 11:38:05AM -0500, Willie Wong wrote:
> >> The problem with this last one is not --deep. It is -
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Willie Wong wrote:
> Hum, I seem to have made an erroneous assumption.
>
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 11:38:05AM -0500, Willie Wong wrote:
>> The problem with this last one is not --deep. It is --update.
>
> Nevermind, I looked at the changelogs for openoffice and
>
Hum, I seem to have made an erroneous assumption.
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 11:38:05AM -0500, Willie Wong wrote:
> The problem with this last one is not --deep. It is --update.
Nevermind, I looked at the changelogs for openoffice and
dev-perl/Archive-Zip, and frankly, I am pretty sure what I said
On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 10:25 -0600, Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Mike Kazantsev
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:52:05 +0200
> > Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >
> >> read the man page.
> >>
> >> Especially the bit about bdeps - these are usually not included
> >> in 'emerge
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:20:19AM -0600, Paul Hartman wrote:
> >> I normally do "emerge -uDvN @world" (or in other words "emerge
> >> --update --deep --verbose --newuse @world"). Right now, it tells me
> >> this:
> > read the man page.
> >
> > Especially the bit about bdeps - these are usually
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Paul Hartman
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Alan McKinnon
> wrote:
>> On Tuesday 13 January 2009 17:44:37 Paul Hartman wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I normally do "emerge -uDvN @world" (or in other words "emerge
>>> --update --deep --verbose --newuse @world"
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Mike Kazantsev
wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:52:05 +0200
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
>> read the man page.
>>
>> Especially the bit about bdeps - these are usually not included
>> in 'emerge -uND world' but will be included when you use -e
>
> I'd also suggest che
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 January 2009 17:44:37 Paul Hartman wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I normally do "emerge -uDvN @world" (or in other words "emerge
>> --update --deep --verbose --newuse @world"). Right now, it tells me
>> this:
>>
>> Total: 0 packages, Size
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:52:05 +0200
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> read the man page.
>
> Especially the bit about bdeps - these are usually not included
> in 'emerge -uND world' but will be included when you use -e
I'd also suggest checking out the @installed set.
--
Mike Kazantsev // fraggod.net
On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 09:44 -0600, Paul Hartman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I normally do "emerge -uDvN @world" (or in other words "emerge
> --update --deep --verbose --newuse @world"). Right now, it tells me
> this:
>
> Total: 0 packages, Size of downloads: 0 kB
>
> I also --depclean on a regular basis to
On Tuesday 13 January 2009 17:44:37 Paul Hartman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I normally do "emerge -uDvN @world" (or in other words "emerge
> --update --deep --verbose --newuse @world"). Right now, it tells me
> this:
>
> Total: 0 packages, Size of downloads: 0 kB
>
> I also --depclean on a regular basis to r
Hi,
I normally do "emerge -uDvN @world" (or in other words "emerge
--update --deep --verbose --newuse @world"). Right now, it tells me
this:
Total: 0 packages, Size of downloads: 0 kB
I also --depclean on a regular basis to remove any unneeded packages.
Right now, it tells me this:
No packages
19 matches
Mail list logo
