-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gustavo Campos wrote:
| BCD is good, but time goes on, we must improve, we must evolve.
|
| We thrived, we evolved, not the time has come for us to step back
| again, into the light.
Every generation has a mythology. Every millennium has a doomsda
BCD is good, but time goes on, we must improve, we must evolve.
We thrived, we evolved, not the time has come for us to step back
again, into the light.
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 11:30 AM, Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 15 March 2008, Gustavo Campos wrote:
> > Of course I c
On Saturday 15 March 2008, Gustavo Campos wrote:
> Of course I can, but first we must state:
>
> little or big endian?
> compliment by two?
Pah! These cocky youngsters, all full of bright ideas about using fancy
new-fangled stuff. What is this endian nonsense of which you speak? And
this twos c
Of course I can, but first we must state:
little or big endian?
compliment by two?
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 10:46 AM, Chris Brennan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> well we could all just give up and communicate in binary You can
> read and r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
well we could all just give up and communicate in binary You can
read and right binary can't you?
Gustavo Campos wrote:
| Well, I must admit I'm not really in the position to negate that one.
| Not a so travelled man, you know?
|
| The truth is
Well, I must admit I'm not really in the position to negate that one.
Not a so travelled man, you know?
The truth is that it take me some time to notice you guys were talking
about our bible-like-one-that-works-e-book, I'm used to read English,
but mostly that one in the tech books.
But never fea
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 23:50:16 -0300, Gustavo Campos wrote:
> And for instance, I would apprecciate if you guys made some globalized
> jokes,
The entire Galaxy isn't global enough for you?
--
Neil Bothwick
Micro-: (prefix) anything both very small and very expensive.
signature.asc
Description
On Saturday 15 March 2008, Chris Brennan wrote:
> Welcome to the Fold! Us nerds should get together and put up the
> end-all Guide discussions ... should be pretty awesome :D
>
> Hot, Cold, Wet ... it's all the same .. But taking a bath just to
> make a meaningless and preportedly major decision, n
On Saturday 15 March 2008, Gustavo Campos wrote:
> And about Marvin, I'm proud to say that I'm the 42 shirt of my
> university soccer team, kinda nerdy for a computer science student
> huh?
You got the #42 shirt??? Wow. You're a real frood.
--
Alan McKinnon
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
--
> Welcome to the Fold! Us nerds should get together and put up the end-all
> Guide discussions ... should be pretty awesome :D
I'm pretty sure we can think an algorithm for that
Maybe even an O(n).
> Hot, Cold, Wet ... it's all the same .. But taking a bath just to make a
> meaningless and p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Welcome to the Fold! Us nerds should get together and put up the end-all
Guide discussions ... should be pretty awesome :D
Hot, Cold, Wet ... it's all the same .. But taking a bath just to make a
meaningless and preportedly major decision, now that i
Man, I've got many towels, you woudn't believe.
You know, it's damn fng hot here, sometimes you need to take 2
baths a day (sorry guys, I know water is as precious as women, but if
you come to visit us you'll understand it).
And about Marvin, I'm proud to say that I'm the 42 shirt of my
unive
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gustavo Campos wrote:
| Well, if anyone cares about it (emo mode) it worked reasonably nice.
| Actually I had a bit less cvs packages then I originally though, but
| still I was able to get rid of most of them. Only compiz and
| scrollkeeper remain.
Well, if anyone cares about it (emo mode) it worked reasonably nice.
Actually I had a bit less cvs packages then I originally though, but still I
was able to get rid of most of them. Only compiz and scrollkeeper remain.
One because of fusion-icon (how can one live without it?) and other cause of
so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alan McKinnon wrote:
| On Friday 14 March 2008, Chris Brennan wrote:
|> Alan McKinnon wrote:
|> | On Friday 14 March 2008, Chris Brennan wrote:
|> |> Alan McKinnon wrote:
|> |>
|> |> I do think ... we have hijacked this thread ... was the original
|
On Friday 14 March 2008, Chris Brennan wrote:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> | On Friday 14 March 2008, Chris Brennan wrote:
> |> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> |>
> |> I do think ... we have hijacked this thread ... was the original
> |> question answered?
> |
> | Yes :-) At least until the OP can do some furth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alan McKinnon wrote:
| On Friday 14 March 2008, Chris Brennan wrote:
|> Alan McKinnon wrote:
|
|> I do think ... we have hijacked this thread ... was the original
|> question answered?
|
| Yes :-) At least until the OP can do some further tests, but
On Friday 14 March 2008, Chris Brennan wrote:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> I do think ... we have hijacked this thread ... was the original
> question answered?
Yes :-) At least until the OP can do some further tests, but he got an
answer that satisfied him for now
--
Alan McKinnon
alan dot mckinn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alan McKinnon wrote:
| On Friday 14 March 2008, Chris Brennan wrote:
|> Alan McKinnon wrote:
|> | On Friday 14 March 2008, Chris Brennan wrote:
|> |>> It was just an idea that came to me, completely untested. Let us
|> |>> know if it mostly works out
On Friday 14 March 2008, Chris Brennan wrote:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> | On Friday 14 March 2008, Chris Brennan wrote:
> |>> It was just an idea that came to me, completely untested. Let us
> |>> know if it mostly works out.
> |>
> |> Does this Go with "Mostly Harmless" too?
> |
> | Not really. If
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alan McKinnon wrote:
| On Friday 14 March 2008, Chris Brennan wrote:
|>> It was just an idea that came to me, completely untested. Let us
|>> know if it mostly works out.
|> Does this Go with "Mostly Harmless" too?
|
| Not really. If it doesn't work
On Friday 14 March 2008, Chris Brennan wrote:
> > It was just an idea that came to me, completely untested. Let us
> > know if it mostly works out.
>
> Does this Go with "Mostly Harmless" too?
Not really. If it doesn't work, the Vogons drop by to see why.
--
Alan McKinnon
alan dot mckinnon at gm
It was just an idea that came to me, completely untested. Let us know if
it mostly works out.
Does this Go with "Mostly Harmless" too?
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Compile time =)
Actually when I ripped off package.unmask, the kde-4 tree just got
crazy, so I moved back only autounmask-kde-meta. After that,
alsa-driver, which was at - wanted to go back to 1.0.15, that
doesn't compile (bug in bugs.gentoo), so I'm now compiling alsa
in-kernel, but ir pretty
On Friday 14 March 2008, Gustavo Campos wrote:
> That's the way I did it before, you know... but it really comes to be
> a pain in the ass when you want to test some new supercool releases
> with tons of dependencies, such as kde-4 and so on.
Tell me about it, been there done that, I feel your pai
That's the way I did it before, you know... but it really comes to be
a pain in the ass when you want to test some new supercool releases
with tons of dependencies, such as kde-4 and so on.
However that's some neat tip, I haven't though on the possibility of
leaving just package.keywords, I'm givi
On Friday 14 March 2008, Gustavo Campos wrote:
> Hi there.
>
> I have a "stable" system (I don't have ~x86 set), but I like to have
> the latest versions of some specific software (kde, gnome, amarok,
> alsa, pulseaudio, wine and so on). To achieve that, I've been using
> autounmask with the parame
Hi there.
I have a "stable" system (I don't have ~x86 set), but I like to have
the latest versions of some specific software (kde, gnome, amarok,
alsa, pulseaudio, wine and so on). To achieve that, I've been using
autounmask with the parameter -n. When I have a package I want to keep
in the latest
28 matches
Mail list logo