Hello,
I have some problem with some of my qemu/kvm guests running Fedora on a
Gentoo host where my Gentoo guests works without problem.
The problem that I have is that when I reboot (shutdown -r now) the
Fedora guest "loses" (ifconfig does not show a IP-address) their network
connections. The
Hi All.
This problem is not strictly related to gentoo, however I'm sure someone
here will be able to help me in some way: sorry if I bother you!
I'm having a really strange problem: for some reason, everytime I reboot my
server, the default gateway gets attached to the 'lo' interface, even if I
On Mon, November 7, 2011 12:13 pm, Massimiliano Ziccardi wrote:
Hi All.
This problem is not strictly related to gentoo, however I'm sure someone
here will be able to help me in some way: sorry if I bother you!
I'm having a really strange problem: for some reason, everytime I reboot
my
You are totally right: I'm not using gentoo, but I'm serching for help and
gentoo's mailing list is the most technical one: I'm truly sorry for the OT.
Just some hint about what could be wrong or some command to launch to
understand what's wrong would be great: I'm getting crazy!!
My
Am 07/11/2011 12:13, schrieb Massimiliano Ziccardi:
Hi All.
[SNIP]
Please!! Do you have any advice?
yes. read and follow the manuals provided by your distribution (your
description doesn't sound gentoo-ish, but EVERY distro should have this
in their documentation).
Thanks,
Massimiliano
Hi,
Am Montag, 7. November 2011, 12:13:58 schrieb Massimiliano Ziccardi:
Hi All.
This problem is not strictly related to gentoo, however I'm sure someone
here will be able to help me in some way: sorry if I bother you!
have a look at:
Already done.
I asked here because I hoped someone would be able to give me some hint
about why with the routes I sent in the previous e-mail pinging the default
gateway it
pings itself (I verified that pinging every server with address
195.75.145.xxx pings the server itself as if it was a
Please do NOT top-post.
On Mon, November 7, 2011 12:34 pm, Massimiliano Ziccardi wrote:
You are totally right: I'm not using gentoo, but I'm serching for help and
gentoo's mailing list is the most technical one: I'm truly sorry for the
OT.
If asking questions on how to do things on non-Gentoo
Please do NOT top-post
Sorry.
If asking questions on how to do things on non-Gentoo installations,
please always mention the distribution in your email.
Ok, sorry again!
What about the documentation?
I have noticed that most binary distros require the use of their graphical
admin tools
On Mon, November 7, 2011 1:15 pm, Massimiliano Ziccardi wrote:
What about the documentation?
I have noticed that most binary distros require the use of their
graphical
admin tools to make any changes to the configuration.
I read the documentation and tried to carefully follow it. Now I'm
Hi,
Am Montag, 7. November 2011, 13:15:53 schrieb Massimiliano Ziccardi:
I thought it was a routing problem, but as you can see, the routes I sent
seems to be ok.
you have those link-local entries in your routes (169.254.0.0/16), Try adding
NOZEROCONF= yes to /etc/sysconfig/network
Best,
Hi All.
The routes and ifconfig seems correct to me.
How is the router configured?
I specifically mean, does it have any firewall configurations redirecting
SSH-traffic to your machine?
I don't have access to the routers, however they are used for many other
servers too.
Moreover, I tried the
you have those link-local entries in your routes (169.254.0.0/16), Try
adding
NOZEROCONF= yes to /etc/sysconfig/network
Already tried, but no luck...
Thanks,
Massimiliano
Am Montag, 7. November 2011, 13:47:49 schrieb Massimiliano Ziccardi:
you have those link-local entries in your routes (169.254.0.0/16), Try
adding
NOZEROCONF= yes to /etc/sysconfig/network
Already tried, but no luck...
could you post the output of
ip route
with zeroconf disabled?
could you post the output of
ip route
with zeroconf disabled?
Here it is!
192.168.19.0/24 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.19.95
195.75.145.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 195.75.145.122
default via 195.75.145.1 dev eth0
Thanks,
Massimiliano
Am Montag, 7. November 2011, 14:15:39 schrieb Massimiliano Ziccardi:
could you post the output of
ip route
with zeroconf disabled?
Here it is!
192.168.19.0/24 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.19.95
195.75.145.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 195.75.145.122
seems to be a really tricky one...
What does
tracepath 195.75.145.33
give?
Here is the output:
1: 195.75.145.33 (195.75.145.33) 0.074ms pmtu
16436
1: 195.75.145.33 (195.75.145.33) 0.039ms reached
1: 195.75.145.33 (195.75.145.33)
On Nov 7, 2011 8:38 PM, Massimiliano Ziccardi
massimiliano.zicca...@gmail.com wrote:
seems to be a really tricky one...
What does
tracepath 195.75.145.33
give?
Here is the output:
1: 195.75.145.33 (195.75.145.33) 0.074ms pmtu
16436
1: 195.75.145.33
Am Montag, 7. November 2011, 14:35:46 schrieb Massimiliano Ziccardi:
seems to be a really tricky one...
What does
tracepath 195.75.145.33
give?
Here is the output:
1: 195.75.145.33 (195.75.145.33) 0.074ms pmtu
16436
1: 195.75.145.33 (195.75.145.33)
I've been deploying multi-interface Linux gateways since 2008, so I'll try.
Please post:
- output of ip rule sh
# ip rule sh
0: from all lookup local
32766: from all lookup main
32767: from all lookup default
# ip route sh table 0
192.168.19.0/24 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link
Our network admin told me to create a lo:0 to that address to create a VIP
to be balanced by the network load balancer.
That is why lo:0 is there...
Thanks!
Regards,
Massimiliano Ziccardi
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 15:01, Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de wrote:
Am Montag, 7. November 2011,
Sorry, I sent you the wrong output of ip route sh table 0.
Follows the right one (sorry!)
# ip route sh table 0
192.168.19.0/24 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.19.95
195.75.145.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 195.75.145.122
default via 195.75.145.1 dev eth0
broadcast
Maybe I found where the problem is!
Shutting down lo:0 everything seems to work properly!
However I need to configure lo:0 for local triangulation (balancing through
RADWARE): how should I configure it to not conflict with the other network
cards?
Thanks!
Massimiliano Ziccardi
I'm going to highlight anomalous routes, those that have no business in the
local table.
On Nov 7, 2011 9:14 PM, Massimiliano Ziccardi
massimiliano.zicca...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been deploying multi-interface Linux gateways since 2008, so I'll
try.
Please post:
- output of ip rule sh
#
Am Montag, 7. November 2011, 15:20:12 schrieb Massimiliano Ziccardi:
Maybe I found where the problem is!
Shutting down lo:0 everything seems to work properly!
However I need to configure lo:0 for local triangulation (balancing through
RADWARE): how should I configure it to not conflict with
try assigning a netmask of 255.255.255.255 to it.
Seems to work!
I'm asking to the network administrators if 255.255.255.255 is ok !
I'll let you know!
Thank you all! Gentoo's mailing list il always the best one!
Thanks!
they told me 255.255.255.255 is ok
I really thank you all very much for your support!
Regards,
Massimiliano
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 15:48, Massimiliano Ziccardi
massimiliano.zicca...@gmail.com wrote:
try assigning a netmask of 255.255.255.255 to it.
Seems to work!
I'm asking to the
On Nov 7, 2011 10:17 PM, Massimiliano Ziccardi
massimiliano.zicca...@gmail.com wrote:
they told me 255.255.255.255 is ok
I really thank you all very much for your support!
Cool! That should solve the problem of a subnet being associated to dev lo
Anyways, this is also a good knowledge
Hi, I am following the gentoo diskless howto for PXE diskless systems
but I cant seem to stop the slave from restarting its network partway
through and losing its root fs (if I have the problem correct).
I am using config_eth0=( noop ) as suggested in the howto but the
network still seems to
On 2/12/07, Roman Naumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/12/07, Hans-Werner Hilse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 09:54:42 +0100 Roman Naumann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ifconfig eth0 gives me this:
Link encap:
UNSPEC HWaddr
Hi,
I have a problem with my ehternet connection and would be pleased if someone
could help me:
I emerged some things (don't ask me what exactly...) and am unable to ping
anything now.
The ip-address and co. are alright, I can just boot another operating system
on my pc (sabayon or windows) and
Hi,
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 09:54:42 +0100 Roman Naumann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ifconfig eth0 gives me this:
Link encap:
UNSPEC HWaddr 44-4F-C0-00-14-31-AC-10-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00
[...]
I'm pretty sure the Mac-Addr is too long.. that's weird,
Also, when using Sabayon, the first line
On 2/12/07, Hans-Werner Hilse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 09:54:42 +0100 Roman Naumann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ifconfig eth0 gives me this:
Link encap:
UNSPEC HWaddr 44-4F-C0-00-14-31-AC-10-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00
[...]
I'm pretty sure the Mac-Addr is too long..
On Dec 8, 2005, at 11:14 pm, pat wrote:
I have a new notebook and trying to setup my Gentoo. I've followed the
Gentoo
handbook and setup the network as DHCP.
But during the boot I have error like this:
eth0 does not exist
Sounds like the driver for your network card isn't loaded. If the
Stroller wrote:
On Dec 8, 2005, at 11:14 pm, pat wrote:
I have a new notebook and trying to setup my Gentoo. I've followed
the Gentoo
handbook and setup the network as DHCP.
But during the boot I have error like this:
eth0 does not exist
Sounds like the driver for your network card
Hi,
I have a new notebook and trying to setup my Gentoo. I've followed the Gentoo
handbook and setup the network as DHCP.
But during the boot I have error like this:
eth0 does not exist
I have to missed something but I have no idea :-(
Could someone push me ???
Thanks a lot.
Pat
--
36 matches
Mail list logo
