Hi, everyone!
I decided to activate the portage ELOG system. I can't make portage send
mail or write in the syslog. "save" appears to be the only working
"PORTAGE_ELOG_SYSTEM" - it saves log files in /var/log/portage for the
emerge activities. The settings relevant to ELOG in my make.conf are:
PO
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 22:28:45 +0200
Daniel Iliev wrote:
> Hi, everyone!
Hi,
I have little to offer to you...
> I decided to activate the portage ELOG system. I can't make portage
> send mail or write in the syslog. "save" appears to be the only
> working "PORTAGE_ELOG_SYSTEM" - it saves log files
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 15:06, Daniel Iliev wrote:
> 1) About the "real" server: Well, "echo test | sendmail -t
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]" works.
So why don't you just take advantage of that?
PORTAGE_ELOG_MAILURI="[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/sbin/sendmail"
--
Bo Andresen
pgpYLBhdzhlVG.pgp
Description
Arnau Bria wrote:
> Hi,
> I have little to offer to you...
>
> I have been having problems with same, but using a "real" mail server
> (for your [EMAIL PROTECTED] I assume you're using default postfix install,
> am I right?)
>
Thank you for you response.
1) About the "real" server: Well, "echo
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:06:01 +0200, Daniel Iliev wrote:
> Now. The things got even more weird and unexplainable for me. I did
> "emerge -DuNav world" and there were some font packages to be rebuild
> because of a change in the USE flags. After emerge finished I got emails
> for the those packages
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> On Tuesday 31 October 2006 15:06, Daniel Iliev wrote:
>
>> 1) About the "real" server: Well, "echo test | sendmail -t
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]" works.
>>
>
> So why don't you just take advantage of that?
>
> PORTAGE_ELOG_MAILURI="[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/sbin/sendmail"
I'm getting this on my laptop:
"!!! A network error occured while trying to send logmail:\n(111,
'Connection refused')\nSure you configured PORTAGE_ELOG_MAILURI
correctly?"
I have this in make.conf:
PORTAGE_ELOG_CLASSES="info warn error log"
PORTAGE_ELOG_SYSTEM="save mail"
PORTAGE_ELOG_MAILURI=
Grant schrieb:
I'm getting this on my laptop:
"!!! A network error occured while trying to send logmail:\n(111,
'Connection refused')\nSure you configured PORTAGE_ELOG_MAILURI
correctly?"
I have this in make.conf:
PORTAGE_ELOG_CLASSES="info warn error log"
PORTAGE_ELOG_SYSTEM="save mail"
PORTA
> I'm getting this on my laptop:
>
> "!!! A network error occured while trying to send logmail:\n(111,
> 'Connection refused')\nSure you configured PORTAGE_ELOG_MAILURI
> correctly?"
>
> I have this in make.conf:
>
> PORTAGE_ELOG_CLASSES="info warn error log"
> PORTAGE_ELOG_SYSTEM="save mail"
> PO
Grant schrieb:
If you wish to use ssmtp with ELOG, you've got to use PORTAGE_ELOG_SYSTEM=custom
and set up your own program in PORTAGE_ELOG_COMMAND. Read my howto at
http://gentoo-wiki.com/TIP_Making_portage_use_/usr/sbin/sendmail_to_send_out_ELOG_mails
That looks pretty slick but I try to do
On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 20:17:46 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> I don't know, but it would be a very useful addition - and IMO,
> they could dump that useless feature, that portage can do SMTP
> by itself. That's so un-Unix, so Windows-like :(
Portage doesn't do SMTP by itself, it uses the Python sm
Neil Bothwick schrieb:
On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 20:17:46 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
I don't know, but it would be a very useful addition - and IMO,
they could dump that useless feature, that portage can do SMTP
by itself. That's so un-Unix, so Windows-like :(
Portage doesn't do SMTP by itself,
Neil Bothwick schrieb:
On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 00:01:34 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Neil Bothwick schrieb:
> Re-using existing software is very unix like
Sending mail with directly speaking SMTP isn't. That's the job
of a MTA.
What if you don't have an MTA installed, which is how this questi
On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 14:27:22 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> >> Sending mail with directly speaking SMTP isn't. That's the job
> >> of a MTA.
> >
> > What if you don't have an MTA installed, which is how this question
> > arose?
>
> Then you install one.
That's not an acceptable answer for a co
Neil Bothwick schrieb:
On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 14:27:22 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
>> Sending mail with directly speaking SMTP isn't. That's the job
>> of a MTA.
>
> What if you don't have an MTA installed, which is how this question
> arose?
Then you install one.
That's not an acceptable a
Grant schrieb:
I'm getting this on my laptop:
"!!! A network error occured while trying to send logmail:\n(111,
'Connection refused')\nSure you configured PORTAGE_ELOG_MAILURI
correctly?"
I have this in make.conf:
PORTAGE_ELOG_CLASSES="info warn error log"
PORTAGE_ELOG_SYSTEM="save mail"
PORTA
On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 21:02:36 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> > It's not wasteful, as it provides an easy option for many people and
> > it uses existing software.
>
> It IS wasteful, as it doesn't use existing, standard software and
> as it re-implements a functionality, which is very likely to b
So, the correct entry for your make.conf is:
PORTAGE_ELOG_MAILURI="[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/sbin/sendmail"
I've tried that and it doesn't seem to be working. I have ssmtp
installed with +mailwrapper. Do I need to set up any other kind of
configuration?
- Grant
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing
Grant wrote:
>> So, the correct entry for your make.conf is:
>>
>> PORTAGE_ELOG_MAILURI="[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/sbin/sendmail"
>
> I've tried that and it doesn't seem to be working.
How is it not working? What's in the logs?
> I have ssmtp
> installed with +mailwrapper.
mailwrapper or not shou
On Monday July 24 2006 01:51, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> Sorry for all the confusion - I should've read the documentation first.
So, is that gentoo-wiki article defunct now?
Tro
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Tro schrieb:
On Monday July 24 2006 01:51, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Sorry for all the confusion - I should've read the documentation first.
So, is that gentoo-wiki article defunct now?
I can't tell yet, as I haven't checked if MAILURI="... /usr/sbin/sendmail"
works fine. But I'd suppose, that
On Monday 24 July 2006 19:08, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> Tro schrieb:
> > On Monday July 24 2006 01:51, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> >> Sorry for all the confusion - I should've read the documentation first.
> >
> > So, is that gentoo-wiki article defunct now?
>
> I can't tell yet, as I haven't checked i
Alexander Skwar schrieb:
Tro schrieb:
On Monday July 24 2006 01:51, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Sorry for all the confusion - I should've read the documentation first.
So, is that gentoo-wiki article defunct now?
I can't tell yet, as I haven't checked if MAILURI="... /usr/sbin/sendmail"
works fi
>> So, the correct entry for your make.conf is:
>>
>> PORTAGE_ELOG_MAILURI="[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/sbin/sendmail"
>
> I've tried that and it doesn't seem to be working.
How is it not working? What's in the logs?
There is nothing in /var/log/mail/ and I can't find anything in
/var/log/everything
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 09:52:04 -0700, Grant wrote:
> > You need to configure ssmtp. Did you do so?
>
> Looking over /etc/ssmtp/ssmtp.conf, it seems like I need to configure
> the mailhub variable? I want to make sure I'm setting up as simple a
> system for getting this elog mail out as possible.
Grant schrieb:
>> So, the correct entry for your make.conf is:
>>
>> PORTAGE_ELOG_MAILURI="[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/sbin/sendmail"
>
> I've tried that and it doesn't seem to be working.
How is it not working? What's in the logs?
There is nothing in /var/log/mail/ and I can't find anything in
/va
> I thought this
> thread was saying using SMTP was optional.
You misunderstood. This thread was about, *WHERE* SMTP is used.
IMO, it's wrong that portage even CAN use SMTP. But nearly always,
you'll need to use some SMTP server to get your mail out. But
with the /usr/sbin/sendmail interface, it
On Tuesday 25 July 2006 19:42, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> Grant schrieb:
> >> > I thought this
> >> > thread was saying using SMTP was optional.
> >>
> >> You misunderstood. This thread was about, *WHERE* SMTP is used.
> >> IMO, it's wrong that portage even CAN use SMTP. But nearly always,
> >> you'
Mick schrieb:
On Tuesday 25 July 2006 19:42, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Grant schrieb:
>> > I thought this
>> > thread was saying using SMTP was optional.
>>
>> You misunderstood. This thread was about, *WHERE* SMTP is used.
>> IMO, it's wrong that portage even CAN use SMTP. But nearly always,
>> y
* Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I thought this
> >> thread was saying using SMTP was optional.
> Can I set my portage elog mail to be sent with UUCP? Is it not
oh, someone's still using good-old uucp ? :)
cu
--
-
Enr
30 matches
Mail list logo
