Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Freitag 25 September 2009, Dale wrote:
>
>> Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>>
>>> On Freitag 25 September 2009, Dale wrote:
>>>
I saw where the drive hours was displayed a long time ago. I thought it
was hdparm that displayed that but I can't
On Freitag 25 September 2009, Dale wrote:
> Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > On Freitag 25 September 2009, Dale wrote:
> >> I saw where the drive hours was displayed a long time ago. I thought it
> >> was hdparm that displayed that but I can't find it in the man page and
> >> -I doesn't seem to sho
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 20:26:12 -0500, Dale wrote:
>
>
>> Weird huh? Can't win either way. Maybe we need a 60 day burn in period
>> before being sold. That should help a little at least.
>>
>
> It's cheaper to let the customer do that and cover it under warranty.
>
>
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 20:26:12 -0500, Dale wrote:
> Weird huh? Can't win either way. Maybe we need a 60 day burn in period
> before being sold. That should help a little at least.
It's cheaper to let the customer do that and cover it under warranty.
--
Neil Bothwick
Those who can, do. Those
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Freitag 25 September 2009, Dale wrote:
>
>>
>> I saw where the drive hours was displayed a long time ago. I thought it
>> was hdparm that displayed that but I can't find it in the man page and
>> -I doesn't seem to show that. Can someone tell me if there is a w
On Freitag 25 September 2009, Dale wrote:
> Paul Hartman wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Dale wrote:
> >> One thing I have noticed about hard drives in my experience. When you
> >> plug that puppy in and power it up, let it run for a good long while.
> >> Overnight is good, a few days
kashani wrote:
> Dale wrote:
>> I also remember this from way back when I was working on puters. I got
>> a new job when winder 3.1 came out. Anyway. If a electronic device can
>> survive the first couple to six months of usage, they usually last a
>> while from the electronic point of view. Th
Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Dale wrote:
>
>>
>> One thing I have noticed about hard drives in my experience. When you
>> plug that puppy in and power it up, let it run for a good long while.
>> Overnight is good, a few days is even better, a week or more is even
>> b
Dale wrote:
I also remember this from way back when I was working on puters. I got
a new job when winder 3.1 came out. Anyway. If a electronic device can
survive the first couple to six months of usage, they usually last a
while from the electronic point of view. That is short of spilling you
=== On Thu, 09/24, walt wrote: ===
> In other words, disk manufacturers have apparently decided to abandon
> strict quality control in favor of low price, and seem happy to
> replace failed drives as a substitute for quality control. It must
> be a profitable strategy because they all seem to be d
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Dale wrote:
> walt wrote:
>> On 09/24/2009 12:29 PM, Dale wrote:
>>
>>> USB. There is another idea. Ooops, out of USB plugs too. Crap, I
>>> can't put in a drive without buying something to plug it into. LOL I
>>> do have USB 2.0 on here. I have to have 2.0 f
walt wrote:
> On 09/24/2009 12:29 PM, Dale wrote:
>
>> USB. There is another idea. Ooops, out of USB plugs too. Crap, I
>> can't put in a drive without buying something to plug it into. LOL I
>> do have USB 2.0 on here. I have to have 2.0 for the printer but my
>> camera has to have 1.0. Wei
On 09/24/2009 12:29 PM, Dale wrote:
USB. There is another idea. Ooops, out of USB plugs too. Crap, I
can't put in a drive without buying something to plug it into. LOL I
do have USB 2.0 on here. I have to have 2.0 for the printer but my
camera has to have 1.0. Weird I know.
There are so
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2009-09-24, James Ausmus wrote:
> > I'm don't think that the connectors are different enough to
> > care about - I had (in a previous life/system) a PCI SATA
> > interface card that had both internal SATA and an eSATA
> > connector, an
On 2009-09-24, James Ausmus wrote:
> paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com > wrote:
>>
>> I think eSATA and SATA physically have different connectors,
>> but they are the technically same (you can buy simple
>> adapters...).
They're compatible but not technically the same. The
electrical specs for eSATA
15 matches
Mail list logo
