On Sun, Apr 22 2012, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 14:21:56 -0400, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
First, thanks for the fix, hopefully not needed.
It appears that the bug is in conf-update and not shadow so the rather
brusque changing of the status of the shadow bug to resolved might be
On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 03:52:39 +0200, Alex Schuster wrote:
The comments there say that if you run etc-update right after the
emerge all is well (but this isn't sufficient for people who use
screen, detatch, and log out). Someone also mentioned
dispatch-conf working. No one mentioned
On Sun, Apr 22 2012, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 03:52:39 +0200, Alex Schuster wrote:
The comments there say that if you run etc-update right after the
emerge all is well (but this isn't sufficient for people who use
screen, detatch, and log out). Someone also mentioned
On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 14:21:56 -0400, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
First, thanks for the fix, hopefully not needed.
It appears that the bug is in conf-update and not shadow so the rather
brusque changing of the status of the shadow bug to resolved might be
appropriate. But it would have been nice
On Fri, Apr 20 2012, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 13:22:20 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
I'll run the update again today, paying more attention, and see what
happens.
What happened is it broke again, with no obvious signs of the cause.
conf-update reported only trivial
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 21.04.2012 17:30, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20 2012, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 13:22:20 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
I'll run the update again today, paying more attention, and
see what happens.
What happened is it
On Sat, Apr 21 2012, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen wrote:
On 21.04.2012 17:30, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
There is a bug filed
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=412721
Am I correct in believing the safe procedure is to add
=sys-auth/pambase-20101024-r2 =sys-apps/shadow-4.1.5.
to
Hinnerk van Bruinehsen writes:
On 21.04.2012 17:30, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20 2012, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 13:22:20 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
[...]
What happened is it broke again, with no obvious signs of the
cause. conf-update reported only trivial
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Before etc-update severaly login-related things didn't work for me (su
not possible for example). After running etc-update everything seems
to work fine for me (e.g. selinux and gnome3).
I must confess that I didn't use sshd on my laptop so I can't
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 17:12:55 -0700, walt wrote:
That seems like a (possibly) helpful clue. When you downgraded,
did you do etc-update again, or were you asked to? Did you run
it after the original upgrade?
No, no and no.
Just to confirm, are you saying that you did *not* run
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 08:56:48 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
I'll run the update again today, paying more attention, and see what
happens.
What happened is it broke again, with no obvious signs of the cause.
conf-update reported only trivial changes to three files.
% su
su: Authentication failure
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 13:22:20 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
I'll run the update again today, paying more attention, and see what
happens.
What happened is it broke again, with no obvious signs of the cause.
conf-update reported only trivial changes to three files.
I've just tried it on my
On 19/04/12 22:46, Neil Bothwick wrote:
I upgraded to sys-auth/pambase-20120417 and sys-apps/shadow-4.1.5-r1 and
found I couldn't login to a new session or use su. Rebooting only made
the problem permanent, I had to SSH in to revert to
sys-auth/pambase-20101024-r2 and sys-apps/shadow-4.1.5.
On 04/19/2012 12:46 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
I upgraded to sys-auth/pambase-20120417 and sys-apps/shadow-4.1.5-r1 and
found I couldn't login to a new session or use su. Rebooting only made
the problem permanent, I had to SSH in to revert to
sys-auth/pambase-20101024-r2 and
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 22:57:45 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Good thing I don't have pambase installed :-P
This is a recent build, so I thought I'd come out of the stone age and
try using pam. That cave looks rather inviting right now...
--
Neil Bothwick
- We are but packets in the internet
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 13:58:42 -0700, walt wrote:
I upgraded to sys-auth/pambase-20120417 and sys-apps/shadow-4.1.5-r1
and found I couldn't login to a new session or use su. Rebooting only
made the problem permanent, I had to SSH in to revert to
sys-auth/pambase-20101024-r2 and
On 20/04/12 00:47, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 22:57:45 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Good thing I don't have pambase installed :-P
This is a recent build, so I thought I'd come out of the stone age and
try using pam. That cave looks rather inviting right now...
When I
On 04/19/2012 02:51 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 13:58:42 -0700, walt wrote:
I upgraded to sys-auth/pambase-20120417 and sys-apps/shadow-4.1.5-r1
and found I couldn't login to a new session or use su. Rebooting only
made the problem permanent, I had to SSH in to revert to
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:39:25 -0700, walt wrote:
That would have failed on su. It works because I have key
authentication for SSH. Otherwise I'd have been screwed.
That seems like a (possibly) helpful clue. When you downgraded,
did you do etc-update again, or were you asked to? Did you
On 04/19/2012 04:41 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:39:25 -0700, walt wrote:
That would have failed on su. It works because I have key
authentication for SSH. Otherwise I'd have been screwed.
That seems like a (possibly) helpful clue. When you downgraded,
did you do
20 matches
Mail list logo