On 10/11/11 13:58, Francesco Talamona wrote:
> On Sunday 09 October 2011, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>> On 10/09/11 13:53, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>> For rxvt, a suitable flag name would be "plugins"
>>
>> Or if there were some package-specific documentation that said,
>> "perl: enable the following plu
On Saturday 08 October 2011, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 10/08/11 15:09, Francesco Talamona wrote:
> > I'm not going to complain, though I'm willing to point out (e.g.
> > commenting on relevant bug reports) that some packages are affected
> > in a bad way by this move.
>
> Comment here? The devs
On Sunday 09 October 2011, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 10/09/11 13:53, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > For rxvt, a suitable flag name would be "plugins"
>
> Or if there were some package-specific documentation that said,
> "perl: enable the following plugins (written in perl): tabs,
> transparency, etc.
On Saturday 08 October 2011, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 10/08/11 15:09, Francesco Talamona wrote:
> > I'm not going to complain, though I'm willing to point out (e.g.
> > commenting on relevant bug reports) that some packages are affected
> > in a bad way by this move.
>
> Comment here? The devs
On Tuesday 11 October 2011, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Saturday 08 October 2011 19:43:53 Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> > I'm going to start a bug-filing campaign against packages like this
> > some day. The only description we ever get for use flag foo is
> > 'enable support for foo', which doesn't tel
On Oct 10, 2011 2:01 AM, "Michael Orlitzky" wrote:
>
> On 10/09/11 13:53, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >
> > For rxvt, a suitable flag name would be "plugins"
> >
>
> Or if there were some package-specific documentation that said, "perl:
> enable the following plugins (written in perl): tabs, transparen
On 10/09/11 13:53, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> For rxvt, a suitable flag name would be "plugins"
>
Or if there were some package-specific documentation that said, "perl:
enable the following plugins (written in perl): tabs, transparency, etc."
In fact, that would be my favorite solution.
On Sun, 09 Oct 2011 12:48:09 -0400
James Cloos wrote:
> AM> "USE=perl" tells you squat, you don't even know what effect it
> AM> will have. You'd have to read the ebuild and the source to figure
> AM> that out.
>
> AM> A MUCH better name is "USE=tabs" with a description like this
> AM> "Provide
AM> "USE=perl" tells you squat, you don't even know what effect it will
AM> have. You'd have to read the ebuild and the source to figure that out.
AM> A MUCH better name is "USE=tabs" with a description like this "Provide
AM> multiple tabs, requires perl."
No, that is not a better name for the US
On 10/08/11 15:09, Francesco Talamona wrote:
>
> I'm not going to complain, though I'm willing to point out (e.g.
> commenting on relevant bug reports) that some packages are affected in a
> bad way by this move.
Comment here? The devs are still CCed even though it's closed:
https://bugs.ge
I second this!
On Sat Oct 8 12:23:57 2011, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 21:09:48 +0200
> Francesco Talamona wrote:
>
>>
>> On Saturday 08 October 2011, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/08/11 13:43, Francesco Talamona wrote:
x11-terms/rxvt-unicode is one of the progra
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 21:09:48 +0200
Francesco Talamona wrote:
> On Saturday 08 October 2011, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> > On 10/08/11 13:43, Francesco Talamona wrote:
> > > x11-terms/rxvt-unicode is one of the program I use the most, today
> > > I lost the ability to have multiple tabs and almost pa
On Saturday 08 October 2011, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 10/08/11 13:43, Francesco Talamona wrote:
> > x11-terms/rxvt-unicode is one of the program I use the most, today
> > I lost the ability to have multiple tabs and almost panicked.
> >
> > I found the solution to have back this essential feat
13 matches
Mail list logo
