Hi, Mick.
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 09:17:45AM +0100, Mick wrote:
> On Saturday 23 April 2011 21:06:25 Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 08:46:30PM +0100, Mick wrote:
> > > What do you get when you run:
> > > # eselect python list
> > Available Python interpreters:
> > [1] pyt
On Sunday 24 April 2011 14:25:58 Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> Hi, Mick.
>
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 09:17:45AM +0100, Mick wrote:
> > On Saturday 23 April 2011 21:06:25 Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> > > On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 08:46:30PM +0100, Mick wrote:
> > > > What do you get when you run:
> > > >
> > >
On Sunday 24 April 2011 16:44:05 Mick wrote:
> On Sunday 24 April 2011 14:25:58 Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> > Hi, Mick.
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 09:17:45AM +0100, Mick wrote:
> > > On Saturday 23 April 2011 21:06:25 Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 08:46:30PM +0100, Mick wr
On 24/4/2011, at 4:44pm, Mick wrote:
> ...
> At this stage you should only run:
>
> python-updater -v
>
> Nothing else.
Doing this today I've had a couple of packages that needed to be emerged with
USE=-doc when they failed.
Stroller.
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 21:40:02 +0200, Stroller wrote about Re:
[gentoo-user] Reinstall Gentoo? [Was: Building pygtk-2.22.0-r1 fails.
Help, please!]:
>On 24/4/2011, at 4:44pm, Mick wrote:
>> ...
>> At this stage you should only run:
>>
>> python-updater -v
>>
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 21:17:23 +0100, David W Noon wrote:
> >Doing this today I've had a couple of packages that needed to be
> >emerged with USE=-doc when they failed.
>
> Those would be jinja and sphinx. They are notorious for their circular
> dependency, which requires USE='-doc' to bypass.
On Sunday 24 April 2011 21:30:33 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 21:17:23 +0100, David W Noon wrote:
> > >Doing this today I've had a couple of packages that needed to be
> > >emerged with USE=-doc when they failed.
> >
> > Those would be jinja and sphinx. They are notorious for their
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 23:16:39 +0100, Mick wrote:
> > It's rarely desirable to enable doc globally. It is best to enable
> > only for those packages where you need extended documentation.
>
> @Alan Mackenzie:
>
> What Neil is saying can be achieved by setting package specific USE
> flags in the
On Monday 25 April 2011 08:30:58 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 23:16:39 +0100, Mick wrote:
> > > It's rarely desirable to enable doc globally. It is best to enable
> > > only for those packages where you need extended documentation.
> >
> > @Alan Mackenzie:
> >
> > What Neil is sayin
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 08:49:35 +0100, Mick wrote:
> > What I'm saying is that you should have -doc in /etc/make.conf and
> > enable it on a per-package basis. The doc flag builds extra
> > documentation that general users don't need, man/info/html pages are
> > included by default (at least, that's
Hi, Neil.
A happy Easter to everybody who celebrates it, and a very good day to
everybody else!
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 11:07:15AM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 08:49:35 +0100, Mick wrote:
> > The doc USE flag is disabled by default on my make.profile
> > (amd64/10.0/desktop)
On 25/4/2011, at 11:07am, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> ...
>> The doc USE flag is disabled by default on my make.profile
>> (amd64/10.0/desktop), so although it won't need to be set as -doc in
>> /etc/make.conf, it will need to be set as doc in the packages that need
>> it in /etc/portage/package.use
Hi, Mick.
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 04:44:05PM +0100, Mick wrote:
> On Sunday 24 April 2011 14:25:58 Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> > Hi, Mick.
> > On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 09:17:45AM +0100, Mick wrote:
> > > On Saturday 23 April 2011 21:06:25 Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 08:46:30P
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 13:18:22 +0100, Stroller wrote:
> Maybe I should disable doc, but it seems "wrong" to me, to miss out on
> all this potentially useful information (which admittedly I never use).
The potentially useful information is installed anyway. USE=doc enables
the potentially useless in
On Monday 25 April 2011 13:11:53 Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> Hi, Mick.
>
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 04:44:05PM +0100, Mick wrote:
> > On Sunday 24 April 2011 14:25:58 Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> > > Hi, Mick.
> > >
> > > On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 09:17:45AM +0100, Mick wrote:
> > > > On Saturday 23 April 20
Hi, Mick.
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 03:12:15PM +0100, Mick wrote:
> On Monday 25 April 2011 13:11:53 Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> > > Once it completes you can run --depclean which will ask you to
> > > remove the older 2.6 python package.
> > I had to (or, at least, did) run emerge -uND @world. Funni
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 8:03 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> Call me a clinging cry-baby if you like, but until I'm confident about my
> new kernel, I'd like to hang on to the old one, including its sources.
> It'd also be nice to run --depclean in the meantime. Do I have to do
> recursive copying o
On Monday 25 April 2011 16:03:21 Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> Hi, Mick.
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 03:12:15PM +0100, Mick wrote:
> > On Monday 25 April 2011 13:11:53 Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> > > > Once it completes you can run --depclean which will ask you to
> > > > remove the older 2.6 python package
Hi, Mark.
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 08:29:47AM -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 8:03 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> Run something like
> emerge --noreplace =gentoo-sources-2.6.38-r1
That's just the job. Thanks.
> HTH,
> Mark
--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
Hi, Nick.
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 05:00:49PM +0100, Mick wrote:
> On Monday 25 April 2011 16:03:21 Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> > As a matter of interest, do you know how to configure a framebuffer
> > console to fill up a wide screen (say, to a width of 170 characters)
> > as contrasted with the 128
20 matches
Mail list logo
