Re: [gentoo-user] What's up with the "hardened" USE flag?

2011-07-04 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 4 Jul 2011 16:57:55 +0200, Daniel Pielmeier wrote: > >> use --changed-use to avoid a rebuild > >> instead of --new-use like Neil suggested. > > > >This only works if you *permanently* switch to --changed-use, otherwise > >you'll just postpone things to next time you use --new-use. I h

Re: [gentoo-user] What's up with the "hardened" USE flag?

2011-07-04 Thread Daniel Pielmeier
2011/7/4 Andrea Conti : > >>> That's IUSE, not USE. > >> IUSE~=USE [1] > > Um, yes. It's what I wrote. Just wanted to state that the use flags _have changed_ because of the IUSE="hardened" injection in the eclass. The whole changeset itself has not effect for non hardened users but forcing a rebui

Re: [gentoo-user] What's up with the "hardened" USE flag?

2011-07-04 Thread Andrea Conti
>> That's IUSE, not USE. > IUSE~=USE [1] Um, yes. It's what I wrote. [editing saved IUSE by hand] > Please do not use such hacks I know it's a hack, and I was not recommending it as a general-purpose solution. > use --changed-use to avoid a rebuild > instead of --new-use like Neil suggested.

Re: [gentoo-user] What's up with the "hardened" USE flag?

2011-07-04 Thread Daniel Pielmeier
2011/7/4 Andrea Conti : > Hello, > >> Everyone will get this. The culprit is a change in the >> pax-utils.eclass [1]. Which adds USE="hardened to every consumer" of >> the eclass. > > That's IUSE, not USE. USE flags are not touched (at least on > non-hardened systems), so the change is only picked

Re: [gentoo-user] What's up with the "hardened" USE flag?

2011-07-04 Thread Andrea Conti
Hello, > Everyone will get this. The culprit is a change in the > pax-utils.eclass [1]. Which adds USE="hardened to every consumer" of > the eclass. That's IUSE, not USE. USE flags are not touched (at least on non-hardened systems), so the change is only picked up by emerge if you use the --new-u

Re: [gentoo-user] What's up with the "hardened" USE flag?

2011-07-04 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 04 Jul 2011 04:26:19 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > After syncing, some heavy packages wanted to rebuild because of the > "hardened" USE flag. (I don't use the hardened profile, but they > wanted to rebuild anyway.) Really heavy stuff including libreoffice > and firefox-5. It took a

Re: [gentoo-user] What's up with the "hardened" USE flag?

2011-07-04 Thread Daniel Pielmeier
2011/7/4 Nikos Chantziaras : > After syncing, some heavy packages wanted to rebuild because of the > "hardened" USE flag.  (I don't use the hardened profile, but they wanted to > rebuild anyway.)  Really heavy stuff including libreoffice and firefox-5. >  It took a few hours.  Then, next resync, an

Re: [gentoo-user] What's up with the "hardened" USE flag?

2011-07-03 Thread meino . cramer
Nikos Chantziaras [11-07-04 04:08]: > After syncing, some heavy packages wanted to rebuild because of the > "hardened" USE flag. (I don't use the hardened profile, but they > wanted to rebuild anyway.) Really heavy stuff including libreoffice > and firefox-5. It took a few hours. Then, next

[gentoo-user] What's up with the "hardened" USE flag?

2011-07-03 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
After syncing, some heavy packages wanted to rebuild because of the "hardened" USE flag. (I don't use the hardened profile, but they wanted to rebuild anyway.) Really heavy stuff including libreoffice and firefox-5. It took a few hours. Then, next resync, and the same packages want to rebui