On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 16:07:28 +0200
Renat Golubchyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes. Append softlevel=single to kernel boot parameters.
Do you know what the difference is, if any, between that and bootlevel?
--
Ian.
EOM
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Is it still possible to boot into 'single' mode,
ie directly into a no-login root system (for emergencies) ?
The kernel dox suggest this should work in Lilo
image = /boot/kernel-2.6.9-gentoo-r1
label = Single
root = /dev/hda3
append=S
read-only
but it boots to
On 2005-08-31 09:25:48 -0400 (Wed, Aug), Philip Webb wrote:
Is it still possible to boot into 'single' mode,
ie directly into a no-login root system (for emergencies) ?
The kernel dox suggest this should work in Lilo
image = /boot/kernel-2.6.9-gentoo-r1
label = Single
On Wed 31.08 09:25, Philip Webb wrote:
Is it still possible to boot into 'single' mode,
ie directly into a no-login root system (for emergencies) ?
You can always do that by appending init=/bin/sh (for example) to the
kernel line when booting, so when lilo comes up, you append this text to
the
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 09:25:48 -0400 Philip Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Is it still possible to boot into 'single' mode,
ie directly into a no-login root system (for emergencies) ?
Yes. Append softlevel=single to kernel boot parameters.
Cheers,
Renat
--
Probleme kann man niemals mit
050831 Mariusz P?kala wrote:
On 2005-08-31 09:25:48 -0400 (Wed, Aug), Philip Webb wrote:
Is it still possible to boot into 'single' mode,
ie directly into a no-login root system (for emergencies) ?
The kernel dox suggest this should work in Lilo
image = /boot/kernel-2.6.9-gentoo-r1
050831 Bert Buchholz wrote:
On Wed 31.08 09:25, Philip Webb wrote:
Is it still possible to boot into 'single' mode,
ie directly into a no-login root system (for emergencies) ?
You can always do that by appending init=/bin/sh to the kernel line
This gets the same result as 'append=emergency',
7 matches
Mail list logo
