Hi,
I have ran into this error a lot of times. I posted it the other day
but have learned that a lot of people don't read HTML stuff. So here I
go again.
This is the whole thing, sorry it is a bit long but I didn't want to cut
out the very part you need. Yes, my rig is named smoker. :/
> [EM
Dale schreef:
> Hi,
>
> I have ran into this error a lot of times. I posted it the other day
> but have learned that a lot of people don't read HTML stuff. So
> here I go again.
>
> This is the whole thing, sorry it is a bit long but I didn't want to
> cut out the very part you need. Yes, m
Holly Bostick wrote:
>Programs That Depend On xmlto
>
>app-text/robodoc
>dev-util/mercurial
>sci-geosciences/gpsd
>sys-auth/libnss-pgsql
>doc media-gfx/k3d
>
>Which, if any of these programs do you have installed on your system?
>
>
I have none of those installed, but that k
Dale schreef:
> Holly Bostick wrote:
>
>
>> Programs That Depend On xmlto
>>
>> app-text/robodoc dev-util/mercurial sci-geosciences/gpsd
>> sys-auth/libnss-pgsql doc media-gfx/k3d
>>
>> Which, if any of these programs do you have installed on your
>> system?
>>
>>
>
>
> I have none of tho
Holly Bostick wrote:
>It is not *currently* installed, you mean. But xmlto remains installed
>as a dependency of the uninstalled package.
>
>Does it (xmlto) appear in the output of an emerge deplclean -p (don't
>forget the -p!!)?
>
>
It is not in that list. I'm pretty sure I had that though.
Well, I tried. This is funny.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] / # emerge -C xmlto
>
> --- Couldn't find xmlto to unmerge.
>
> >>> unmerge: No packages selected for removal.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] / #
If it is not there, what is trying to pull it in? This is weird. That
k3d thing is not installed either.
Dale wrote:
>If it is not there, what is trying to pull it in? This is weird. That
>k3d thing is not installed either.
>
>Dale
>:-)
>
>
>
Well, I had a brain storm, it happens sometimes LOL, and I found this
little thing:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] / # equery -C depends xmlto
> [ Searching for packa
Hi,
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 06:47:10 -0600
Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why does the kernel need xmlto? It seems to work without it.
in order to build documentation. Remove the doc USE flag if you don't
want it to.
-hwh
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Hans-Werner Hilse wrote:
>Hi,
>
>
>
>
>in order to build documentation. Remove the doc USE flag if you don't
>want it to.
>
>-hwh
>
>
So the Kernel has documentation or is this the little help screen in
menuconfig? I need that help screen. I don't know what half that stuff
is even with the h
Dale wrote:
> So the Kernel has documentation
Yes.
> or is this the little help screen in
> menuconfig?
No, that's not affected by USE=doc.
> Don't they have a new thing that we can override the USE for specific
> packages in /etc/portage?
Yes. /etc/portage/package.use
Syntax:
category/pkg
Dale schreef:
> Hans-Werner Hilse wrote:
>
>> in order to build documentation. Remove the doc USE flag if you
>> don't want it to.
>>
>>
>
> So the Kernel has documentation or is this the little help screen in
> menuconfig? I need that help screen. I don't know what half that
> stuff is ev
Holly Bostick wrote:
>the 'help' screen you're talking about is part of the kernel. Removing
>it doesn't remove internal help, like the kernel help, or man and info
>pages-- those are *required*, and options subject to USE flags are
>*optional*.
>
>But if it will help, I don't use the "doc" flag e
Dale wrote:
> For those that need to see it in use like me, I added this to my
> /etc/portage/package.use file:
>
>>sys-kernel/gentoo-sources -doc
In your file, do you also have those ">" in front of the "sys-kernel"?
If so - you shouldn't have them there.
> Thanks for the help guys, and Ho
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 08:32:50 -0600, Dale wrote:
> Thanks for the examples. *That* helps me a lot. Reading man pages
> without examples does very little if anything at all for me. I learn by
> doing or seeing examples and understanding how they work and what they
> mean.
man portage is full of
Alexander Skwar wrote:
>Dale wrote:
>
>
>
>>>sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-doc
>>>
>>>
>
>In your file, do you also have those ">" in front of the "sys-kernel"?
>If so - you shouldn't have them there.
>
>
>
There is no <, > or = in there. I copy and paste all I can because my
typing suc
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> man portage is full of examples, such as:
>
> package.use
> Per-package USE flags. Useful for tracking local
> USE flags or for enabling USE flags for certain
> packages only. Perhaps you develop GTK and thus you
> want documentatio
Dale schreef:
>
> There is no <, > or = in there. I copy and paste all I can because
> my typing sucks. I type slow and it still sucks. :(
>
emerge gtypist
emerge tuxtype
emerge tuxtype2
emerge dvorak7min (if you happen to have a dvorak keyboard)
emerge dvorakng (ditto)
emerge typespeed
eme
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 09:12:45 -0600, Dale wrote:
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
> > man portage is full of examples, such as:
~~~
[snip]
> Is man:emerge in Konqueror the same as man emerge in a command line?
Yes. it's also the same as #man in the Alt-F2 Run command box, which is
the one
Holly Bostick wrote:
>
>>emerge gtypist
>>emerge tuxtype
>>emerge tuxtype2
>>emerge dvorak7min (if you happen to have a dvorak keyboard)
>>emerge dvorakng (ditto)
>>emerge typespeed
>>emerge ktouch
>>
>>Naturally you don't need all of these, but I thought I'd list what's in
>>Portage. I have gtypi
Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
>that's because while "man emerge", "man:emerge" and "#emerge" are all
>equivalent, none of them give the information in the *portage* man page :)
>
>
>
>
Holy smoke, I didn't know that was there. Parden me while I go read
this new man page. I'm sure I'll have new questi
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 10:04:07 -0600, Dale wrote:
> Holy smoke, I didn't know that was there. Parden me while I go read
> this new man page. I'm sure I'll have new questions then. ;) LOL
>
> That is different from man emerge though.
man emerge just documents the emerge command and its options.
21 matches
Mail list logo
