On 07/22/2010 01:09 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Looks like a quad cpu, each one dual core. I've got one of those in the Data
> Centre next door and each core is running that new fancy hyper-threading that
> actually works:
It's quad CPU TWELVE core. Just putting four CPUs into the thing will
cost
On Thursday 22 July 2010 02:03:15 Dale wrote:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On Thursday 22 July 2010 00:18:05 Bill Longman wrote:
> >> On 07/21/2010 12:39 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday 21 July 2010 17:49:46 Bill Longman wrote:
> And to play devil's advocate, I'll chime in with my ex
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Thursday 22 July 2010 00:18:05 Bill Longman wrote:
On 07/21/2010 12:39 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Wednesday 21 July 2010 17:49:46 Bill Longman wrote:
And to play devil's advocate, I'll chime in with my experience. The 4.4
GCC, at least on AMD CPUs, cr
On Thursday 22 July 2010 00:18:05 Bill Longman wrote:
> On 07/21/2010 12:39 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On Wednesday 21 July 2010 17:49:46 Bill Longman wrote:
> >> And to play devil's advocate, I'll chime in with my experience. The 4.4
> >> GCC, at least on AMD CPUs, creates noticeably faster code
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 03:36:33PM -0500, Dale wrote
> My last KDE upgrade made KDE a little faster here as well. It won't be
> as fast as e17 tho. Since I upgraded gcc a little before that, I wasn't
> sure if it was gcc building better code or KDE got rid of some garbage.
> It is a little f
On 07/21/2010 12:39 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 July 2010 17:49:46 Bill Longman wrote:
>> And to play devil's advocate, I'll chime in with my experience. The 4.4
>> GCC, at least on AMD CPUs, creates noticeably faster code. I recompiled
>> all my packages after I upgraded to 4.4 and
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Wednesday 21 July 2010 17:49:46 Bill Longman wrote:
And to play devil's advocate, I'll chime in with my experience. The 4.4
GCC, at least on AMD CPUs, creates noticeably faster code. I recompiled
all my packages after I upgraded to 4.4 and it was a noticeable
differen
On Wednesday 21 July 2010 17:49:46 Bill Longman wrote:
> And to play devil's advocate, I'll chime in with my experience. The 4.4
> GCC, at least on AMD CPUs, creates noticeably faster code. I recompiled
> all my packages after I upgraded to 4.4 and it was a noticeable
> difference.
>
> But, to mak
On 07/21/2010 03:22 AM, Dale wrote:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> On Wednesday 21 July 2010 10:53:19 fajfu...@wp.pl wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I've just switched to gcc 4.3.4 from 4.1.2 using gcc-config tool. I
>>> don't
>>> want to rebuild any package now. As time goes on my packages will be
>>> comp
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Wednesday 21 July 2010 10:53:19 fajfu...@wp.pl wrote:
Hi
I've just switched to gcc 4.3.4 from 4.1.2 using gcc-config tool. I don't
want to rebuild any package now. As time goes on my packages will be
compiled with new version. I hope that after a few month there will
On Wednesday 21 July 2010 10:53:19 fajfu...@wp.pl wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've just switched to gcc 4.3.4 from 4.1.2 using gcc-config tool. I don't
> want to rebuild any package now. As time goes on my packages will be
> compiled with new version. I hope that after a few month there will be
> only a numbe
HiI've just switched to gcc 4.3.4 from 4.1.2 using gcc-config tool. I don't wantto rebuild any package now. As time goes on my packages will be compiled withnew version. I hope that after a few month there will be only a number ofpackages not compiled with a new gcc. Then I want to recompile them
12 matches
Mail list logo
