On Wednesday 17 September 2008, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
Volker Armin Hemmann a écrit:
and in grub.conf I have this:
title=raid
root (hd0,0)
kernel /vmlinuz root=/dev/md1 md=1,/dev/sda3,/dev/sdb3 nopat
Did you tried this :
kernel /vmlinuz root=/dev/md1 md=1,1,/dev/sda3,/dev/sdb3 nopat
Volker Armin Hemmann a écrit:
Did you tried this :
kernel /vmlinuz root=/dev/md1 md=1,1,/dev/sda3,/dev/sdb3 nopat
nope. Why the second one?
The fisrt one is the md device number and the second is to explicitly
give the raid level.
I personally have this line :
kernel
Volker Armin Hemmann a écrit:
and in grub.conf I have this:
title=raid
root (hd0,0)
kernel /vmlinuz root=/dev/md1 md=1,/dev/sda3,/dev/sdb3 nopat
Did you tried this :
kernel /vmlinuz root=/dev/md1 md=1,1,/dev/sda3,/dev/sdb3 nopat
--
Nicolas Sebrecht
On Wednesday 17 September 2008, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
Volker Armin Hemmann a écrit:
and in grub.conf I have this:
title=raid
root (hd0,0)
kernel /vmlinuz root=/dev/md1 md=1,/dev/sda3,/dev/sdb3 nopat
Did you tried this :
kernel /vmlinuz root=/dev/md1 md=1,1,/dev/sda3,/dev/sdb3 nopat
Hi,
I have tried to setup a software Raid1 for root (/), boot, home and var.
So far, so good. Support is in kernel. The four ones are assembled:
Personalities : [raid1]
md3 : active raid1 sda6[0] sdb6[1]
421906944 blocks [2/2] [UU]
md2 : active raid1 sda5[0] sdb5[1]
19534912 blocks
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:41:42 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have tried to setup a software Raid1 for root (/), boot, home and var.
So far, so good. Support is in kernel. The four ones are assembled:
Personalities : [raid1]
md3 : active raid1 sda6[0] sdb6[1]
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:54:03 +0200, Xav' wrote:
You have to know that the kernel isn't able to assemble RAID devices
together without the use of mdadm. So you have to use an initrd with the
mdadm binary to use a RAID root !
Could you please keep quiet about that, my computers have been using
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:59:03 +0100, Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:54:03 +0200, Xav' wrote:
You have to know that the kernel isn't able to assemble RAID devices
together without the use of mdadm. So you have to use an initrd with the
mdadm binary to use a
[ 28.08.2008 16:41 ], Volker Armin Hemmann :
Hi,
I have tried to setup a software Raid1 for root (/), boot, home and var.
So far, so good. Support is in kernel. The four ones are assembled:
Personalities : [raid1]
md3 : active raid1 sda6[0] sdb6[1]
421906944 blocks [2/2] [UU]
On Donnerstag, 28. August 2008, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:54:03 +0200, Xav' wrote:
You have to know that the kernel isn't able to assemble RAID devices
together without the use of mdadm. So you have to use an initrd with the
mdadm binary to use a RAID root !
Could you
On Donnerstag, 28. August 2008, ert256 wrote:
[ 28.08.2008 16:41 ], Volker Armin Hemmann :
Hi,
I have tried to setup a software Raid1 for root (/), boot, home and var.
So far, so good. Support is in kernel. The four ones are assembled:
Personalities : [raid1]
md3 : active raid1
Am Donnerstag, 28. August 2008 17:30:44 schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
thanks, the last thing I want to deal with is an initrd.
It's initramfs nowadays and that's quite easy to handle.
Bye...
Dirk
On Donnerstag, 28. August 2008, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 28. August 2008 17:30:44 schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
thanks, the last thing I want to deal with is an initrd.
It's initramfs nowadays and that's quite easy to handle.
do you have a nice little howto? Not some general one
You don't need all of that...
With mdadm can you put your RAID array as persistent. If it is
persistent your kernel can use the autodetect function and build it
before mount /
I have in my raidtab
# cat /etc/raidtab
raiddev /dev/md0
raid-level1
chunk-size4k
persistent-superblock 1
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 19:41:04 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
From the stuff I read it
should work - but I always get a root not found panic
Root device or root fs?
--
Neil Bothwick
Q: What's the proper plural of a 'Net-connected Windows machine?
A: A Botnet
signature.asc
Description:
On Donnerstag, 28. August 2008, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Donnerstag, 28. August 2008, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 28. August 2008 17:30:44 schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
thanks, the last thing I want to deal with is an initrd.
It's initramfs nowadays and that's quite easy
On Donnerstag, 28. August 2008, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 19:41:04 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
From the stuff I read it
should work - but I always get a root not found panic
Root device or root fs?
it doesn't find /dev/md1 (unknown block device) and panics. And yes, I
Le Thursday 28 August 2008 20:45:15 Volker Armin Hemmann, vous avez écrit :
On Donnerstag, 28. August 2008, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 19:41:04 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
From the stuff I read it
should work - but I always get a root not found panic
Root device
On Donnerstag, 28. August 2008, Xav' wrote:
Le Thursday 28 August 2008 20:45:15 Volker Armin Hemmann, vous avez écrit :
On Donnerstag, 28. August 2008, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 19:41:04 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
From the stuff I read it
should work - but I
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 20:52:33 +0200, Xav' wrote:
it doesn't find /dev/md1 (unknown block device) and panics. And yes, I
created md0,1,2,3 with mknod in /dev
Did you create the nodes with de /dev partition unmounted ? I think you
have to check this... because when the kernel boot up, the
20 matches
Mail list logo
