>> >> >> >> Strangely, now my laptop's brightness adjustment doesn't work via
>> >> >> >> the
>> >> >> >> keyboard shortcuts. Any ideas on that?
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> - Grant
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> > Please share the beast model :P (or maybe ive missed it).
>> >> >> > in kernel config You have mu
Dnia 2010-04-27, wto o godzinie 10:37 -0700, Grant pisze:
> >> >> >> Strangely, now my laptop's brightness adjustment doesn't work via the
> >> >> >> keyboard shortcuts. Any ideas on that?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> - Grant
> >> >> >>
> >> >> > Please share the beast model :P (or maybe ive missed it).
>> >> >> Strangely, now my laptop's brightness adjustment doesn't work via the
>> >> >> keyboard shortcuts. Any ideas on that?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> - Grant
>> >> >>
>> >> > Please share the beast model :P (or maybe ive missed it).
>> >> > in kernel config You have multiple option for backlight eg. fo
Dnia 2010-04-26, pon o godzinie 19:10 -0700, Grant pisze:
> >> >> Strangely, now my laptop's brightness adjustment doesn't work via the
> >> >> keyboard shortcuts. Any ideas on that?
> >> >>
> >> >> - Grant
> >> >>
> >> > Please share the beast model :P (or maybe ive missed it).
> >> > in kernel c
>> >> Strangely, now my laptop's brightness adjustment doesn't work via the
>> >> keyboard shortcuts. Any ideas on that?
>> >>
>> >> - Grant
>> >>
>> > Please share the beast model :P (or maybe ive missed it).
>> > in kernel config You have multiple option for backlight eg. for thinkpad
>> > there
Dnia 2010-04-23, pią o godzinie 09:51 -0700, Grant pisze:
> >> Strangely, now my laptop's brightness adjustment doesn't work via the
> >> keyboard shortcuts. Any ideas on that?
> >>
> >> - Grant
> >>
> > Please share the beast model :P (or maybe ive missed it).
> > in kernel config You have multip
Mike Edenfield wrote:
On 4/23/2010 1:37 PM, Grant wrote:
Can anyone confirm that as users we should be moving away from hal?
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/x/x11/xorg-server-1.8-upgrade-guide.xml
http://xorg.freedesktop.org/wiki/XorgHAL
OK, and since xorg-server-1.
Can anyone confirm that as users we should be moving away from hal?
>>>
>>> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/x/x11/xorg-server-1.8-upgrade-guide.xml
>>> http://xorg.freedesktop.org/wiki/XorgHAL
>>
>> OK, and since xorg-server-1.7 doesn't have a udev USE flag, I should
>> probably stick wi
On 4/23/2010 1:37 PM, Grant wrote:
>>> Can anyone confirm that as users we should be moving away from hal?
>>
>> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/x/x11/xorg-server-1.8-upgrade-guide.xml
>> http://xorg.freedesktop.org/wiki/XorgHAL
>
> OK, and since xorg-server-1.7 doesn't have a udev USE flag,
>> Can anyone confirm that as users we should be moving away from hal?
>
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/x/x11/xorg-server-1.8-upgrade-guide.xml
> http://xorg.freedesktop.org/wiki/XorgHAL
OK, and since xorg-server-1.7 doesn't have a udev USE flag, I should
probably stick with hal until 1.8
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Grant wrote:
> Can anyone confirm that as users we should be moving away from hal?
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/x/x11/xorg-server-1.8-upgrade-guide.xml
http://xorg.freedesktop.org/wiki/XorgHAL
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 09:51:19AM -0700, Grant wrote:
> > And (its only my private opinion - could base on wrong facts :P) dont be
> > used to hal because the 1.8 xorg-server dont like it any more,
> > preferring udev, and future versions wouldn't probably support hal at
> > all.
> >
> > Lately i
>> Strangely, now my laptop's brightness adjustment doesn't work via the
>> keyboard shortcuts. Any ideas on that?
>>
>> - Grant
>>
> Please share the beast model :P (or maybe ive missed it).
> in kernel config You have multiple option for backlight eg. for thinkpad
> there is extra one in "thinkp
Dnia 2010-04-22, czw o godzinie 09:47 -0700, Grant pisze:
> >>> Could this be the problem?
> >>>
> >>> # grep ^\(EE /var/log/Xorg.0.log
> >>> (EE) Failed to load module "vesa" (module does not exist, 0)
> >>> (EE) Failed to load module "fbdev" (module does not exist, 0)
> >>> (EE) intel(0): [drm] F
On Thursday 22 April 2010 17:47:23 Grant wrote:
> >>> Could this be the problem?
> >>>
> >>> # grep ^\(EE /var/log/Xorg.0.log
> >>> (EE) Failed to load module "vesa" (module does not exist, 0)
> >>> (EE) Failed to load module "fbdev" (module does not exist, 0)
> >>> (EE) intel(0): [drm] Failed to o
>>> Could this be the problem?
>>>
>>> # grep ^\(EE /var/log/Xorg.0.log
>>> (EE) Failed to load module "vesa" (module does not exist, 0)
>>> (EE) Failed to load module "fbdev" (module does not exist, 0)
>>> (EE) intel(0): [drm] Failed to open DRM device for : No such file or
>>> directory
>>> (EE)
>> Could this be the problem?
>>
>> # grep ^\(EE /var/log/Xorg.0.log
>> (EE) Failed to load module "vesa" (module does not exist, 0)
>> (EE) Failed to load module "fbdev" (module does not exist, 0)
>> (EE) intel(0): [drm] Failed to open DRM device for : No such file or
>> directory
>> (EE) intel(0
On 4/21/2010 3:07 PM, Grant wrote:
> Could this be the problem?
>
> # grep ^\(EE /var/log/Xorg.0.log
> (EE) Failed to load module "vesa" (module does not exist, 0)
> (EE) Failed to load module "fbdev" (module does not exist, 0)
> (EE) intel(0): [drm] Failed to open DRM device for : No such file or
>>> ummm .. ok ? so your using the default xorg.conf .. could be why youve got
>>> bad performance.
>>>
>>> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/xorg-config.xml
>>>
>>> -
>>> deface
>> But the new version of xorg (from circa 1.7) dont really need xorg.conf,
>> moreover its discouraged to use one. (or just
On 21 April 2010 12:26, Adam wrote:
>>> ummm .. ok ? so your using the default xorg.conf .. could be why youve got
>>> bad performance.
>>>
>>> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/xorg-config.xml
>>>
>>> -
>>> deface
>> But the new version of xorg (from circa 1.7) dont really need xorg.conf,
>> moreover
>> ummm .. ok ? so your using the default xorg.conf .. could be why youve got
>> bad performance.
>>
>> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/xorg-config.xml
>>
>> -
>> deface
> But the new version of xorg (from circa 1.7) dont really need xorg.conf,
> moreover its discouraged to use one. (or just i think
Dnia 2010-04-20, wto o godzinie 11:51 -0700, Grant pisze:
> >> ummm .. ok ? so your using the default xorg.conf .. could be why youve got
> >> bad performance.
> >>
> >> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/xorg-config.xml
> >>
> >> -
> >> deface
> > But the new version of xorg (from circa 1.7) dont reall
>> ummm .. ok ? so your using the default xorg.conf .. could be why youve got
>> bad performance.
>>
>> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/xorg-config.xml
>>
>> -
>> deface
> But the new version of xorg (from circa 1.7) dont really need xorg.conf,
> moreover its discouraged to use one. (or just i think
Dnia 2010-04-19, pon o godzinie 20:24 -0500, deface pisze:
> ummm .. ok ? so your using the default xorg.conf .. could be why youve got
> bad performance.
>
> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/xorg-config.xml
>
> -
> deface
But the new version of xorg (from circa 1.7) dont really need xorg.conf,
more
ummm .. ok ? so your using the default xorg.conf .. could be why youve got bad
performance.
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/xorg-config.xml
-
deface
On Apr 19, 2010, at 5:43 PM, Grant wrote:
>> did etc-update over write xorg.conf ?
>
> I actually don't use an xorg.conf at all.
>
> - Grant
>
> did etc-update over write xorg.conf ?
I actually don't use an xorg.conf at all.
- Grant
>> I just updated a lot of packages on my laptop including xorg stuff,
>> the intel-drivers, and firefox. Firefox is running really slowly now,
>> with kind of a lag to everything. Does anyone know of an
did etc-update over write xorg.conf ?
On Apr 19, 2010, at 5:06 PM, Grant wrote:
> I just updated a lot of packages on my laptop including xorg stuff,
> the intel-drivers, and firefox. Firefox is running really slowly now,
> with kind of a lag to everything. Does anyone know of anything to try
>
I just updated a lot of packages on my laptop including xorg stuff,
the intel-drivers, and firefox. Firefox is running really slowly now,
with kind of a lag to everything. Does anyone know of anything to try
in order to fix it? Do I need to disable or enable DRI?
- Grant
Hi Lists,
I have recently made some plans out of my ideas about the bugday
project. They have ended up in a forum thread[1] in the userrep forum.
Feel free to comment on it or contact me directly or any of my team
members if you have any questions about this. We are hanging around in
#Gentoo-Bugs
ally
resolved for me regardless of the kernel generation method chosen.
JD
-Original Message-
From: Roy Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 11:16 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] updates
John Dangler wrote:
>Roy~
>Thanks for t
Yes, it is.
JD
-Original Message-
From: Qian Qiao [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 7:00 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] updates
On 10/30/05, John Dangler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Roy~
> Thanks for the reply. I a
John Dangler wrote:
Roy~
Thanks for the reply. I actually used genkernel to make the kernel. I used
'genkernel all'. That's why I'm a little confused as to why this didn't
take effect. The previous kernel was also built with genkernel and didn't
have any problems.
Regards,
JD
I'm about
On 10/30/05, John Dangler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Roy~
> Thanks for the reply. I actually used genkernel to make the kernel. I used
> 'genkernel all'. That's why I'm a little confused as to why this didn't
> take effect. The previous kernel was also built with genkernel and didn't
> have a
Original Message-
From: Roy Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 5:27 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] updates
John Dangler wrote:
>hrmm...
>I recompile the new kernel, before rebooting, I run module-rebuild list...
>and get
John Dangler wrote:
hrmm...
I recompile the new kernel, before rebooting, I run module-rebuild list...
and get one entry - "=media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.6629-r4"
So, I reboot the new kernel, and get no Ethernet, no wireless, no sound,
nonvidia, and the vga mode is wrong. (the grub entry is a
day, October 30, 2005 3:12 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] updates
John Dangler wrote:
>Holly~
>
>Thanks for the reply. It seems fairly straightforward. From reading this,
>I would think that running module-rebuild populate would be the first task.
&g
John Dangler wrote:
Holly~
Thanks for the reply. It seems fairly straightforward. From reading this,
I would think that running module-rebuild populate would be the first task.
Add/Del package would be for building discriminate versions of a kernel
(presumably for locating problems or just te
riginal Message-
From: Holly Bostick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 2:35 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] updates
John Dangler schreef:
>
>> John Dangler schreef:
> Holly Bostick schreef:
>
>> I'm trying to
John Dangler schreef:
>
>> John Dangler schreef:
> Holly Bostick schreef:
>
>> I'm trying to get a definitive answer to this - when I want to
>> install a new kernel, I know that there are certain packages that
>> will not come back, Is there a way to setup a list of these based
>> on what I have
JD
-Original Message-
From: Holly Bostick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 1:52 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] updates
John Dangler schreef:
> I'm trying to get a definitive answer to this - when I want to install a
new
>
John Dangler schreef:
> I'm trying to get a definitive answer to this - when I want to install a new
> kernel, I know that there are certain packages that will not come back, and
> need to be re-emerged on the new kernel. Is there a way to setup a list of
> these based on what I have installed on
I'm trying to get a definitive answer to this - when I want to install a new
kernel, I know that there are certain packages that will not come back, and
need to be re-emerged on the new kernel. Is there a way to setup a list of
these based on what I have installed on my current Gentoo kernel to ma
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 03:31:14AM +1200, Peter O'Connor wrote:
> An interesting conundrum indeed.
>
> You can't install (due to it being blocked) ieee80211-1.0.3 with
> ipw2100-1.1.0 merged
>
> And from the error message you posted it looks like you can't merge
> ipw2100 (>1.1.0) without havin
hn Dangler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 9:31 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: RE: [gentoo-user] updates with B
That fails with this...
!!! ERROR: net-wireless/ipw2100-1.1.2-r1 failed.
!!! Function linux-mod-src-compile, Line 491, Exitcode 2
!!! Unable to
Would
John Dangler
GenoFit
800-505-4078 (Corporate)
386-767-3730 (Direct)
www.genofit.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: John Dangler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 9:31 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: RE: [gentoo-user] updates with B
John Dangler wrote:
That makes some sense. (Gentoo is all about choices)
So, basically, I emerge the new 'slot' and then re-compile the new kernel
version according to the handbook, giving me both the existing kernel
version and the new version...
Exactly, installing the new kernel sources does n
es [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 10:02 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] updates
John Dangler wrote:
> I just finished the base install of the 2005.1 system (2.6.12-r6). When I
> run emerge -sync, and then emerge -uDvp system, I get a sh
you might also want to try
man emerge
most commands on your system will have a manpage, and they will probably
give you helpful hints as to how they function. you can also do it
with any other command:
man ls
man gcc
man ldd
man man
...
Hope that helps,
Marco
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mail
John Dangler wrote:
I just finished the base install of the 2005.1 system (2.6.12-r6). When I
run emerge -sync, and then emerge -uDvp system, I get a short list updates
that portage wants to emerge, but there aren't any kernel updates. However,
if I run emerge -uDvp world, there is a new versio
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2005 9:22 AM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] updates with B
John Dangler wrote:
>looking at the list of updates after a fresh install of 2005.1 (2.6.12-r6)
>on my laptop which has both wired and wireless networkin
John Dangler wrote:
looking at the list of updates after a fresh install of 2005.1 (2.6.12-r6)
on my laptop which has both wired and wireless networking, I see an entry
which says.
[blocks B] <=net-wireless/ipw2100-1.1.0 (is blocking
net-wireless/ieee80211-1.0.3)
.
.
.
[ebuild N] net-wirele
looking at the list of updates after a fresh install of
2005.1 (2.6.12-r6) on my laptop which has both wired and wireless networking, I
see an entry which says…
[blocks B] <=net-wireless/ipw2100-1.1.0 (is blocking
net-wireless/ieee80211-1.0.3)
.
.
.
[ebuild N] net-wireless/ieee80211-1.
I just finished the base install of the 2005.1 system (2.6.12-r6). When I
run emerge -sync, and then emerge -uDvp system, I get a short list updates
that portage wants to emerge, but there aren't any kernel updates. However,
if I run emerge -uDvp world, there is a new version of the gentoo-source
53 matches
Mail list logo
