On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:33 PM, James wrote:
> I'll get the error message and then post it here.
>
> I'm using Samsung drives that haven't seen any other problems under
> heavily utilization.
>
> What specific kernel version are you using? What version of vbox?
>
> -j
>
The underlying Gentoo sys
I'll get the error message and then post it here.
I'm using Samsung drives that haven't seen any other problems under
heavily utilization.
What specific kernel version are you using? What version of vbox?
-j
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 14:52, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 10:44 AM, J
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 10:44 AM, James wrote:
> There doesn't seem to be anything in the VBox.log that indicates the
> system had a hard lockup. I imagine the kernel panicing resulted in
> VirtualBox being unable to write to the log.
>
> Is anyone running VB on a Linux raid partition? I've logical
There doesn't seem to be anything in the VBox.log that indicates the
system had a hard lockup. I imagine the kernel panicing resulted in
VirtualBox being unable to write to the log.
Is anyone running VB on a Linux raid partition? I've logically
narrowed down the issue to one of the following:
(a)
On Tuesday 31 May 2011 20:55:08 Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Tanstaafl
wrote:
> > On 2011-05-31 1:31 PM, James wrote:
> >> The only thing I've read online that may be applicable is that there
> >> have been some issues with kernel panics when you give the guest OS
> >> m
On 05/31/2011 01:31 PM, James wrote:
> Anyone having any problems with VirtualBox and kernel panics?
>
> I've tried vbox 3 and 4, both with the same behavior. Installing
> Windows 7 as a guest and either (a) my system will completely freeze
> (I'm assuming the kernel panicked), or (b) I'm thinking
On 5/31/2011 12:11 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2011-05-31 1:31 PM, James wrote:
The only thing I've read online that may be applicable is that there
have been some issues with kernel panics when you give the guest OS
more than 1 processor. It would suck badly if SMP didn't work well on
vbox.
My un
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2011-05-31 1:31 PM, James wrote:
>> The only thing I've read online that may be applicable is that there
>> have been some issues with kernel panics when you give the guest OS
>> more than 1 processor. It would suck badly if SMP didn't work w
On 2011-05-31 1:31 PM, James wrote:
> The only thing I've read online that may be applicable is that there
> have been some issues with kernel panics when you give the guest OS
> more than 1 processor. It would suck badly if SMP didn't work well on
> vbox.
My understanding is it is a general rule
Anyone having any problems with VirtualBox and kernel panics?
I've tried vbox 3 and 4, both with the same behavior. Installing
Windows 7 as a guest and either (a) my system will completely freeze
(I'm assuming the kernel panicked), or (b) I'm thinking the Linux raid
module dies because the system
10 matches
Mail list logo
