On 8/12/20 5:56 PM, Adam Carter wrote:
Depends on your use case, ... so what you use will depend on
speed/reliability trade off.
There are some specific uses cases where speed is desired at least an
order of magnitude more than reliability.
ext2 is less reliable due to it missing the journa
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 5:29 AM Grant Taylor <
gtay...@gentoo.tnetconsulting.net> wrote:
> On 8/12/20 11:53 AM, Никита Степанов wrote:
> > which filesystem is best for raid 0?
>
Performance wise, ext4 and XFS lead most benchmarks for non-raid. XFS seems
best for raid1, so I imagine either of thos
which filesystem is best for raid 0?
On 8/12/20 11:53 AM, Никита Степанов wrote:
which filesystem is best for raid 0?
I'm guessing that you're after speed more than anything else since
you're talking about RAID 0.
As such, I'd suggest avoiding a journaling file system as that's
probably unnecessary overhead.
I'd consider ext
On 12/08/2020 18:53, Никита Степанов wrote:
which filesystem is best for raid 0?
DON'T.
https://raid.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Linux_Raid
If you're thinking about raid 0, I'll suggest using btrfs instead. Just
don't forget that, by default, btrfs mirrors the metadata (I think that
means the
5 matches
Mail list logo
