Hi folks,
> -Original Message-
> From: Uwe Thiem [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 23 December 2006 07:57
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Has Linux "jumped the Shark"?
>
-- snip --
> The control centre has been problema
Jerry McBride wrote:
>
> PURE Microsoft FUD... "They" are pulling out all the stops now, trying to
> block the advancement of Linux in any areas they can. The fact is, they are
> loosing big time, big money.
>
> Do a simple google safari for "ie 7" and "windows vista" and read the posts
> from o
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 21:32, Jeff Rollin wrote:
> Hi all
>
> A discussion on the staff blogs over at OSNews about the Linux desktop
> got me thinking. Thom and Eugenia seem to think that "the linux
> desktop peaked in 2001-2004", but I don't remember the hype around
> Ubuntu starting till w
On AD 2006 December 21 Thursday 10:35:47 AM +0200, Uwe Thiem wrote:
> Or is it about KDE4?
KDE is the most advanced desktop I've used (that doesn't include vista's
'new' desktop). The desktop that ships with OSX may come close to KDE
for features but it is styled to the point of annoyance both be
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 02:32:15 +, Jeff Rollin wrote:
> Their argument seemed to be that
> because GNOME is running into problems and because KDE is behind
> schedule, the Linux desktop is dead.
STOP PRESS: KDE 4 is behind schedule and KDE 3.5 stops working as a
result!
Although how a project
Hey fellow Gentoo-ers.
> -Original Message-
> From: Norman Rieß [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 21 December 2006 06:01
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Has Linux "jumped the Shark"?
>
>
> Jeff Rollin schrieb:
&g
On 21 December 2006 04:32, Jeff Rollin wrote:
> Hi all
>
> A discussion on the staff blogs over at OSNews about the Linux desktop
> got me thinking. Thom and Eugenia seem to think that "the linux
> desktop peaked in 2001-2004", but I don't remember the hype around
> Ubuntu starting till well after
Jeff Rollin schrieb:
Their argument seemed to be that
because GNOME is running into problems and because KDE is behind
schedule, the Linux desktop is dead.
How true is this?
Jeff
Like "uh, we cannot finish this tiny feature here in 3 days as planned,
so let us give up the whole project"? :-)
On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 21:03 -0700, Justin Findlay wrote:
> On AD 2006 December 21 Thursday 02:32:15 AM +, Jeff Rollin wrote:
> > because GNOME is running into problems and because KDE is behind
> > schedule, the Linux desktop is dead.
>
> Hahahaha!
>
> That's funny.
>
>
> Justin
Would this
On AD 2006 December 21 Thursday 02:32:15 AM +, Jeff Rollin wrote:
> because GNOME is running into problems and because KDE is behind
> schedule, the Linux desktop is dead.
Hahahaha!
That's funny.
Justin
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
10 matches
Mail list logo