On Monday 15 December 2008 03:40:00 am Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 21:48:47 -0500, Jeff Cranmer wrote:
> > I've also discovered that the /etc/make.profile symlink was pointing at
> > the x86 default-linux profile set, not the amd64 profile.
> >
> > I'm attempting a recompile now with
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 21:48:47 -0500, Jeff Cranmer wrote:
> I've also discovered that the /etc/make.profile symlink was pointing at
> the x86 default-linux profile set, not the amd64 profile.
>
> I'm attempting a recompile now with the symlink changed, and hopefully
> this will fix my problems. I
Jeff Cranmer wrote:
> It looks like fixing the /etc/make.profile symlink fixed my problem.
> I'm still a little nervous about whether I need to run any other commands in
> order to prevent my system going wrong after making this correction.
>
> Jeff
>
>
>
Let me see if I understand correctly.
It looks like fixing the /etc/make.profile symlink fixed my problem.
I'm still a little nervous about whether I need to run any other commands in
order to prevent my system going wrong after making this correction.
Jeff
On Sunday 14 December 2008 09:48:47 pm Jeff Cranmer wrote:
> Progress:
>
>
Progress:
I've discovered that athlon64 is a valid gcc make flag, so I changed it back.
I've also discovered that the /etc/make.profile symlink was pointing at the
x86 default-linux profile set, not the amd64 profile.
I'm attempting a recompile now with the symlink changed, and hopefully this
Thanks,
That only adds more questions.
My environment is amd64. It appears to have downloaded the i586 binary.
Surely this is incorrect?
my make.conf file contains the line
CFLAGS="-O2 -pipe -march=athlon-xp", which should trigger the 64 bit binaries
to be downloaded and acted upon.
The CFLA
2008/12/13 Jeff Cranmer
> Perhaps it would have done if I knew where the download page was.
The file /usr/portage/dev-java/sun-jdk/sun-jdk-1.6.0.11.ebuild
will disclose this information, and hints at
https://jdk-distros.dev.java.net/developer.html
Regards.
Perhaps it would have done if I knew where the download page was.
On Saturday 13 December 2008 07:25:36 am Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 23:03:43 -0500, Jeff Cranmer wrote:
> > Failed to extract the files. Please refer to the Troubleshooting
> > section of the Installation Instructio
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 23:03:43 -0500, Jeff Cranmer wrote:
> Failed to extract the files. Please refer to the Troubleshooting
> section of the Installation Instructions on the download page for more
> information.
Did this help?
--
Neil Bothwick
The nice thing about Windows is - It does not jus
9 matches
Mail list logo