ntp:ntp
I would have liked to be better prepared for this but the gentoo wiki
page has been down for a few weeks now. We are not looking for
microsecond synchronization however, down to the second would be nice!
Kind Regards,
Nick.
Hello Andrea,
Thank you so much for your time. I missed the part about log^2 in the
documentation.
Kind Regards,
Nick.
On 5/10/13, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
On May 10, 2013 5:23 PM, Andrea Conti a...@alyf.net wrote:
Hello,
server tick.nrc.ca minpoll 64 maxpoll 1024 iburst
kernel modules, ipsec-tools and iptables, we see that as
keeping it simple and effective.
Your insight, suggested how-to pages are greatly appreciated.
Thanks in Advance,
Nick.
like to run make and make modules_install on the new machine.
Thanks in Advance,
Nick.
Thanks yet again Michael! Enjoy your weekend.
N.
On 5/11/13, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On 05/11/2013 03:13 PM, Nick Khamis wrote:
Hello Everyone,
Our service provider requires all connections between us be done
through IPSec IKE. From the little bit of research, I found
Thank you!!!
On 5/12/13, staticsafe m...@staticsafe.ca wrote:
On 5/11/2013 20:39, Nick Khamis wrote:
Hello Everyone,
Just running an installation on another IBM machine, and wanted to know
which kernel config files can we copy over from one machine to another,
and have the same exact
I just realized that we were running 3.5.7 on the older systems, and
the current version is 3.7.10. Would I be cutting too many corners to
copy over the ..config from the older machine.
Thanks in Advance,
Nick.
On 5/12/13, Nick Khamis sym...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you!!!
On 5/12/13
Please forgive me! Gmail client from hell!
, but when
included SSH access is blocked out. Not sure why, isn't the sequence
correct (i.e., the ACCPET entries before the DROP and REJECT)?
Also, any pointers or heads up when going stateless would be greatly
appreciated.
Kind Regards,
Nick
For testing purposes I changed the ssh rule to:
-A TCP -p tcp -m tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT
-A TCP -p tcp -m tcp -s 0.0.0.0/0 -d 192.168.2.5 --dport 22 -j DROP
And still no go. As mentioned before, everything works fine until I
try to close up the rest of the ports not opened up in the chains
UDP
to remaining protocols sent
to closed ports
-A INPUT -i $INTIF1 -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-proto-unreachable
#echo -e- Dropping output traffic to remaining protocols sent
to closed ports
-A OUTPUT -o $INTIF1 -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-proto-unreachable
Thanks in Advance,
Nick.
Hello Everyone,
Thank you so much for your responses. I agree Alan, total pain in the
neck!!! But it's a ticket that was passed down to me. We moved the
stateful firewalls inside the network, broken down to each department.
But as a first on site defense on our BGP router running Quagga, we
only
Neal,
As for the --sport flag for OUTPUT, should it not be left arbitrary?
The SSH daemon should use unprivileged ports between 1024 and 65535.
The only daemon I know thus far that does not is NTP which is
hardwired to 123 both ways.
Thanks Guys,
Nick.
could be balanced, it would be great!
Kind Regards,
Nick.
, Nick Khamis sym...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everyone,
I am looking to put together a linux router for small business, and
was wondering if there was anything the suite (using quagga etc..)
that would allow for load balancing of regular dsl links. Kind of like
cisco with fast ethernet 0,1 and ip
Any different if the links are VDSL? I have little experience in
working with DSL based connections, and was wondering what was
possible in terms or bridging/bonding etc.. if anything.
N.
On 5/25/13, Nick Khamis sym...@gmail.com wrote:
I missed out some crusial info in my last email
, maybe the session would suffice (i.e,
per network session)?
Although per packet would be preferred.
Kind Regards,
Nick.
On 5/26/13, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday 26 May 2013 22:35:14 J. Roeleveld wrote:
On 25 May 2013, at 22:26, Nick Khamis wrote:
... As mentioned
Sorry for the top post.
N.
By downstream, I mean within our own network. Obviously downstream LB
from the ISP's DSLAM would be impossible without MLPP, BGP support...
N
And who says you can't teach an old man new tricks huh geezer ;)?
Thank you so much for your response!!! That sorts out outgoing
traffic, have you had to setup rules for incoming traffic? I mean
from the outside world to a server for example?
Kind Regards,
Nick.
,
Nick.
Hello Nick,
the question is, what are you doing with it and why do you think you
need a fibre channel SAN.
Our goal indeed is to get rid of the SAN infrastructure as it is
delicately to all kinds of failure with nearly zero fault tolerance.
An example, you have an hicup or a power failure
be using a black box from HP etc.., but just a general idea.
Kind Regards,
Nick.
up
of virutal storage drives, snapshots etc...
Kind Regards,
Nick.
, one for storage vlans and one for the production
vlans. Performance is not the issue.
Good network engineering.
I guess also with this setup replication would be handled by rsync? If so, the
potential of this setup really starts to shine.
WOW, from NAS to SAN?
Kind Regards,
Nick.
Hello Norman,
Sorry for the delayed response
What do you mean by replication?
Oh I was referring to the replication of the entire NFS server with virtual
drive images etc.. to other machines for fail over, maybe load balancing.
Kind Regards,
Nick.
Anyone using Hadoop for managing virtual machines and/or drives.
Kind Regards,
Nick.
please read the news it's a must. If your network card drivers are
built as modules ''in theory'' you are not effected. If they are built
into the kernel, you will have to delete a 70- something file, and
replace it with an 80- something empty file, to keep the same ethN
wlanN names. Sorry, i do
What you gents are talking about it stonith. At the UPS and Host
level, it's everything off or everything on. If you like individual
STONITH per host, it's been a while however, this is done at the PDU
and Host level. As for VM, I use Xen, and there we use libvirt and/or
fence_virt.
There we have
Not sure if pdflatex uses Java too however that is what I use.
Gentoo minimal and unetbootin:
http://programminglinuxblog.blogspot.ca/2011/02/gentoo-on-usb-stick.html#!/2011/02/gentoo-on-usb-stick.html
really solid for us due to many factors, and the idea of
being able to build everything from the ground up
is Gentoo, with Pacemaker, GFS, and DRBD. This is for our failover system.
Kind Regards,
Nick from Toronto.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 7:36 PM, Franklin Wang touch2...@gmail.com wrote
Nick
Information Management Office - U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
+1.504.862.1046 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 9:03 PM
To: Zimmerman, Nick MVN-Contractor
Subject: Digest of gentoo-user
901 - 933 of 933 matches
Mail list logo
