...@atm.ox.ac.uk; Salif KONE skonem...@yahoo.fr;
kcalde...@carnegiescience.edu
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 8:57 AM
Subject: Re: [geo] Al Gore on geoengineering
The Cold War and the Apollo Program were not pursued in the expectation of
profiting from software spinoffs, LED lighting,CAT scanners, cell
Dear All,
I think this is a terrible comparison to make and should not be used. I
heard someone this summer who was trained by Al Gore use this and she
did not distinguish between all the effects of atomic bombs and the
energy equivalent of the atomic explosions.
Equating nuclear war and
@googlegroups.com [mailto:geoengineering@googlegroups.com]
On Behalf Of Alan Robock
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 2:31 PM
To: geoengineering@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [geo] Al Gore on geoengineering
Dear All,
I think this is a terrible comparison to make and should not be used. I heard
someone
Alan,
I see your point Do you (or does anyone) have a more appropriate
analogy for such large amounts of heat? The tempting thing about the
Hiro is it's just the right amount (63 terajoules) for many global
climate numbers I have sometimes used Civ, the power production of
all of
[mailto:geoengineering@googlegroups.com]
On Behalf Of David Appell
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 2:56 PM
To: geoengineering@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [geo] Al Gore on geoengineering
Alan,
I see your point Do you (or does anyone) have a more appropriate analogy
for such large amounts of heat? The tempting
@googlegroups.commailto:geoengineering@googlegroups.com
[mailto:geoengineering@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of David Appell
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 2:56 PM
To: geoengineering@googlegroups.commailto:geoengineering@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [geo] Al Gore on geoengineering
Alan,
I see your point Do you
Dear David,
I think an array of incandescent light bulbs around the world would work
much better. If you have 100 W bulbs, and want to model an imbalance at
the surface of 1 W/m2, then you will need one light bulb every 100 m2,
multiplied by 1 over the fraction of energy emitted by each bulb
Dear Alan and All,
Here is a video we produced at Colby on energy consumption (not global
warming) using lightbulbs. The tall gentleman on the library steps is
Sherry Rowland. Perhaps someone could make an array of Christmas tree
lights?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YSPJOTX06JU
Jim Fleming
javascript:
*Sent: *Saturday, August 24, 2013 12:09:59 PM
*Subject: *RE: [geo] Al Gore on geoengineering
If we take a portfolio view, the question is how large and what type of
investment should we be making in solar geoengineering research.
Agreed
le : Samedi 24 août 2013 16h46
Objet : Re: [geo] Al Gore on geoengineering
Al Gore is not opposing geoengineering research because he wants to profit off
of climate change, as suggested by Eugene.
Asserting this is as nutty as asserting that people commonly support
geoengineering research
.physics.ox.ac.uk/contacts/people/driscoll
--
*From:* Salif KONE [skon...@yahoo.fr javascript:]
*Sent:* 24 August 2013 15:19
*To:* Simon Driscoll; geoengi...@googlegroups.com javascript:
*Subject:* Re: [geo] Al Gore on geoengineering
I do disagree with this Al Gore
2013 13:15
To: geoengineering@googlegroups.com
Cc: Simon Driscoll
Subject: Re: [geo] Al Gore on geoengineering
Simon,
I do understand that he assumes the SRM technique to be awful under the
consideration of injecting sulfate aerosol in the stratosphere, but works
undertaking under the umbrella
(0) 7935314940
http://www2.physics.ox.ac.uk/contacts/people/driscoll
From: Salif KONE [skonem...@yahoo.fr]
Sent: 25 August 2013 13:15
To: geoengineering@googlegroups.com
Cc: Simon Driscoll
Subject: Re: [geo] Al Gore on geoengineering
Simon
[skonem...@yahoo.fr]
Sent: 25 August 2013 13:15
To: geoengineering@googlegroups.com
Cc: Simon Driscoll
Subject: Re: [geo] Al Gore on geoengineering
Simon,
I do understand that he assumes the SRM technique to be awful under the
consideration of injecting sulfate aerosol in the stratosphere
.physics.ox.ac.uk/contacts/people/driscoll
From: Salif KONE [skonem...@yahoo.fr]
Sent: 24 August 2013 15:19
To: Simon Driscoll; geoengineering@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [geo] Al Gore on geoengineering
I do disagree with this Al Gore' statement ...We shouldn’t waste
',
'skonem...@yahoo.fr');]
*Sent:* 24 August 2013 15:19
*To:* Simon Driscoll; geoengineering@googlegroups.com javascript:_e({},
'cvml', 'geoengineering@googlegroups.com');
*Subject:* Re: [geo] Al Gore on geoengineering
I do disagree with this Al Gore' statement ...We shouldn’t waste a
lot
: Salif KONE; geoengineering@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [geo] Al Gore on geoengineering
There is a pleasing simplicity to answering a question as if it were a binary,
but I suppose if you got these people in a room and spoke with them quietly,
the question could not be answered with a yes
: *Salif KONE skonem...@yahoo.fr, geoengineering@googlegroups.com
*Sent: *Saturday, August 24, 2013 12:09:59 PM
*Subject: *RE: [geo] Al Gore on geoengineering
If we take a portfolio view, the question is how large and what type of
investment should we be making in solar geoengineering research
Al Gore: Let me deal with the geoengineering part of your question first.
That’s complex because there are some benign geoengineering proposals like
white roofs or efforts to figure out a way to extract CO2 from the atmosphere ,
though no one has figured out how to do that yet. But the
19 matches
Mail list logo
