and John N. At our current pace of year-to-year
>>>>> > global CO2 emissions reductions (nonexistent) and with clear AGW and
>>>>> > OA, it is time to seriously ask what are all of our options for
>>>>> > managing CO2 and its cons
ionsŠbecause ecologists don't have the necessary
> information/insight.
>
>
>
>
> John Harte
> Professor of Ecosystem Sciences
> ERG/ESPM
> 310 Barrows Hall
> University of California
> Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
> jha...@berkeley.edu
>
>
>
> On Ju
ity issues of underground molecular CO2 storage. Do we really want
>>> > the CCS lobby and marketing machine to monopolize the CDR space, as they
>>> > have point-source CO2 mitigation, at the expense
>>> > of a much broader search for safer and more cost effective CO2 managment
>>> > strategies, thus hol
)Schuiling; Geoengineering; CARTER; Oliver Tickell
Subject: Re: [geo] World Bank report highlights necessity of (BE)CCS
John H and Greg—Sorry, I’m running a bit behind. I want to go back to this
issue of how long the carbon sink in the ocean will continue at the magnitude
it is. Someone will have
g pre-
>>> or post-emissions fossil fuel CO2? And, given what is at stake, can we
>>> really afford to limit ourselves to using less than 30% of the planet in
>>> solving a global problem, i.e., ignore the ocean? I therefore find IPCC's
>>> NAS's a
omotion of aforestation and BECCS as the
> poster children of CDR dangerously narrow minded.
> >
> > Greg
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 6/9/15, John Harte wrote:
> >
> > Subject: Re: [geo] World Bank report highlights necessity of (B
n of CDR dangerously narrow minded.
>
> Greg
>
> ----------------
> On Tue, 6/9/15, John Harte wrote:
>
> Subject: Re: [geo] World Bank report highlights necessity of (BE)CCS
> To: "John Nissen"
> Cc: "Schuiling, R.D.
Olaf
>> Schuiling
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: geoengineering@googlegroups.com [mailto:
>> geoengineering@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Greg Rau
>> Sent: maandag 25 mei 2015 21:55
>> To: geoengineering@googlegroups.com
>> Subject: [g
usly narrow minded.
Greg
On Tue, 6/9/15, John Harte wrote:
Subject: Re: [geo] World Bank report highlights necessity of (BE)CCS
To: "John Nissen"
Cc: "Schuiling, R.D. (Olaf)" , "gh...@sbcglobal.net"
, "geoengineer
, Olaf
>> Schuiling
>>
>> -----Original Message-
>> From: geoengineering@googlegroups.com
>> [mailto:geoengineering@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Greg Rau
>> Sent: maandag 25 mei 2015 21:55
>> To: geoengineering@googlegroups.com
>> Subject: [ge
f Of Greg Rau
> Sent: maandag 25 mei 2015 21:55
> To: geoengineering@googlegroups.com
> Subject: [geo] World Bank report highlights necessity of (BE)CCS
>
> http://bellona.org/news/climate-change/2015-05-world-bank-report-highlights-necessity-ccs
>
> “We need Bio-CCS to attain carbon neu
From: geoengineering@googlegroups.com [mailto:
> geoengineering@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Greg Rau
> Sent: maandag 25 mei 2015 21:55
> To: geoengineering@googlegroups.com
> Subject: [geo] World Bank report highlights necessity of (BE)CCS
>
>
> http://bellona.org/news/climate-c
[mailto:geoengineering@googlegroups.com]
On Behalf Of Greg Rau
Sent: maandag 25 mei 2015 21:55
To: geoengineering@googlegroups.com
Subject: [geo] World Bank report highlights necessity of (BE)CCS
http://bellona.org/news/climate-change/2015-05-world-bank-report-highlights-necessity-ccs
“We need Bio
http://bellona.org/news/climate-change/2015-05-world-bank-report-highlights-necessity-ccs
“We need Bio-CCS to attain carbon neutrality by 2100”
"This statement forms a key area of scientific consensus, shared by the IPCC in
the 5AR and acknowledged by the World Bank’s report. Achieving the 2°C t
14 matches
Mail list logo
