[Geoserver-devel] [JIRA] (GEOS-9972) Update Jetty to 9.4.38.v20210224

Mark Prins ( https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?accountId=5d68e9f964bfb10c11a29d83 ) *created* an issue GeoServer ( https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOS?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiYTBmN2I2ZDlhYmUwNDNhZjkzYzJkYWRiZTMzMmJjZDgiLCJwIjoiaiJ9 ) / Bug (

[Geoserver-devel] [JIRA] (GEOS-9971) GeoWebCache S3 plugin require AWS creds

Vyaheslav Andreykiv ( https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?accountId=557058%3A1a369662-7483-46a3-b8a3-3cdac125a575 ) *created* an issue GeoServer ( https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOS?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiMDVkYTdmNGI1NWYzNGE3NmE0MTJhMmEyMzc5M2M2MjYiLCJwIjoiaiJ9 ) / Bug

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP 201 - Cloud Native GeoServer Project Donation

I updated the page last week :P -- Jody Garnett On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 at 10:53, Gabriel Roldan wrote: > Hi PSC, > > In a couple days it'll be 10 days since the proposal and I'll proceed > unless there's a negative vote. If you have a chance please vote so it > doesn't go on with a single +1? > >

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP 176 - CITE Automation

I think I volunteer for osgeo id stuff, let me go and make sure you have access It has been done before, but not by us - we can ask the gdal or postgis group for pointers if we need to. It is a nexus repository if that helps (looks to be possible with maven

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP 201 - Cloud Native GeoServer Project Donation

+1 -Jukka Rahkonen- Lähettäjä: Gabriel Roldan Lähetetty: keskiviikko 10. maaliskuuta 2021 20.52 Vastaanottaja: Geoserver-devel Aihe: Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP 201 - Cloud Native GeoServer Project Donation Hi PSC, In a couple days it'll be 10 days since the proposal and I'll proceed unless

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP 201 - Cloud Native GeoServer Project Donation

+1 Sorry lost track of this one Cheers Andrea Il Mar 2 Mar 2021, 18:24 Gabriel Roldan ha scritto: > Hi, GSIP 201 created (pun intended). > > As discussed in previous PSC meetings, I've created a proposal for > donating the *Cloud Native GeoServer* project to the community, on behalf > of

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP 201 - Cloud Native GeoServer Project Donation

Hi PSC, In a couple days it'll be 10 days since the proposal and I'll proceed unless there's a negative vote. If you have a chance please vote so it doesn't go on with a single +1? Much appreciated, Gabe El mar., 2 de marzo de 2021 2:21 p. m., Gabriel Roldan < gabriel.rol...@gmail.com>

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP 176 - CITE Automation

I am applying to get an osgeo id. I hope it doesn't take long. Do you know how to push docker images from the build server? Is this something we've already done before? Thank you On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 6:33 PM Jody Garnett wrote: > We setup an osgeo docker repository just for this activity:

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP 176 - CITE Automation

We setup an osgeo docker repository just for this activity: https://repo.osgeo.org/#browse/browse:geoserver-docker Let me know your osgeo id and I can set you up. The build server should already have access... -- Jody Garnett On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 at 09:22, Alessandro Parma <

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP 176 - CITE Automation

Hi Jody, Do you know if there's a docker repository I can push the Teamengine docker image to? I am using GeoSolutions docker hub organizational account ATM. Thanks, Alessandro On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 3:47 PM Jody Garnett

Re: [Geoserver-devel] reminder 2.19 scheduled for next week

Which reminds me about: https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOS-9944 - I would like to request that be backported to 2.19.x for the release. The PR (https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/4791 - Double checked that the suggested filename was based on the typename (so the default

Re: [Geoserver-devel] reminder 2.19 scheduled for next week

That is good, thank you very much! Please update the schedule when you have a moment. On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 8:13 AM Alessandro Parma < alessandro.pa...@geo-solutions.it> wrote: > Hi Jody, All, > > I noticed there are no volunteers for the 2.19 release yet. Andrea Aime > and I would be happy

[Geoserver-devel] [JIRA] (GEOS-9970) MapML GetFeature bug fix for CRS authority

Peter Rushforth ( https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?accountId=557058%3A758f97c4-0255-444c-8e63-db502672e3f5 ) *created* an issue GeoServer ( https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOS?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiMTM1Zjk1ZDNiMjAxNDk3NWI3ODllODNjNzQ5ZTk0NzgiLCJwIjoiaiJ9 ) / New

Re: [Geoserver-devel] [Geotools-devel] Excessive method length code smell

On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 4:34 PM Gabriel Roldan wrote: > Yeah, 500 sounded like a stupidly high limit, sounds like a good one to > start with, with 4 offenders per project. > Ah yeah sorry... I quickly scanned through the thread and missed the report (I don't really read mails anymore, just

Re: [Geoserver-devel] [Geotools-devel] Excessive method length code smell

Hey Andrea, On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 at 12:02, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi Gabriel, > I would love to see having a limit on the method length... but remember > when running these QAs you're pretty much alone > (as I've been for most of the QA work, even when other people > participated, I ended up doing

Re: [Geoserver-devel] [Geotools-devel] Excessive method length code smell

Hi Gabriel, I would love to see having a limit on the method length... but remember when running these QAs you're pretty much alone (as I've been for most of the QA work, even when other people participated, I ended up doing well over 90% of the job). I would suggest you start with a very high

Re: [Geoserver-devel] [Geotools-devel] Excessive method length code smell

Hi Joseph, I'm not sure there's anything that specific, but not an expert either. There are a number of design checks though[1], maybe you want to explore a little bit. Trying to be too strict will get us in trouble, for example, if we wanted to honor the LawOfDemeter one. To be clear, I'm not

Re: [Geoserver-devel] [Geotools-devel] Excessive method length code smell

I think ExcessiveMethodLength is an important check for the readability and maintainability for code. Is the opposite check also available? Something that would flag too much abstraction and/or too much inheritance or too many interfaces, leading to confusing, unreadable empty methods and

[Geoserver-devel] [JIRA] (GEOS-9969) geotiff files can no longer have spaces in the names

Jody Garnett ( https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?accountId=557058%3Ae422bb7f-4808-47e3-837f-13db0e6681e3 ) *created* an issue GeoServer ( https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOS?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiOWRmMzA0YjA0MThiNDc3MGJiMzUwNWViZjliNjRjNjUiLCJwIjoiaiJ9 ) / Bug (

[Geoserver-devel] Excessive method length code smell

Hey all, sorry for cross-posting but this relates to both projects. One of the PMD rules I'd like to set up the most is ExcessiveMEthodLength. It'll just fail on a threshold for lines of code in a single method. I've made some assessments for 500 and 100 lines of code limits, check this out:

[Geoserver-devel] [JIRA] (GEOS-9968) Contribute new community Smart Data Loader

Marco Volpini ( https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?accountId=5a129c3cb35ed9014cf6b480 ) *created* an issue GeoServer ( https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOS?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiMDYzM2FjMTM4N2Y3NDU0ODhkZmYxMWMyMzBkODAyOTMiLCJwIjoiaiJ9 ) / New Feature (

[Geoserver-devel] reminder 2.19 scheduled for next week

Thanks to everyone testing and contributing fixes based on the release candidate. Please remember to backport fixes to the 2.19.x branch if you wish them included in the release next week. -- Jody Garnett ___ Geoserver-devel mailing list