Hi Justin,
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 6:50 AM, Justin Deoliveira <
jdeol...@boundlessgeo.com> wrote:
>
> 1. What would be the consequence of not using the naming convention and
> just exposing the stored queries directly as they are named? Is it solely
> to make it explicit that the type is a stored
Hey Sampo,
Sorry I haven't been following the work too closely, but my first initial
thoughts.
1. What would be the consequence of not using the naming convention and
just exposing the stored queries directly as they are named? Is it solely
to make it explicit that the type is a stored query, and
Ok. I hadn't noticed you were this far along. I was proposing merging our
changesets to avoid us from diverging from this point onwards. As you're
almost done so we should be pretty safe from that.
Andrea, Justin, or anyone: do you guys have any comments regarding the
questions I brought up earlie
Hi,
Should I just create a pull request on your branch and then I could
continue work on a branch based off your branch? This would mean bundling
our changes into a single changeset. I haven't heard any opposition to this
idea, though. Thoughts?
Sampo
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Niels C
There is currently a pull request for my changes being reviewed.
I'm not sure when your changes will be reviewed and by whom. But I
assume they need to be reviewed separately, and preferably not at the
same time. But it is already good that your changes have now a base from
my branch.
Regards
Thanks for the merging Sampo, looks good.
Cheers
Niels
On 15/05/14 11:09, Sampo Savolainen wrote:
Hi,
I've successfully merged my and Niels's work. It was surprisingly easy
with only one minor conflict. I noticed that you have discussed having
a shared branch for me, Niels and Reni. This wou
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
>
> GeoServer core currently depends on the wfs module in order to support WMS
> feature portrayal services,
> that is, requests where the indication of the data to be painted is
> provided in the request by giving
> a link to a capabilities docu
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Sampo Savolainen <
sampo.savolai...@spatineo.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've successfully merged my and Niels's work. It was surprisingly easy
> with only one minor conflict. I noticed that you have discussed having a
> shared branch for me, Niels and Reni. This would
Hi,
I've successfully merged my and Niels's work. It was surprisingly easy with
only one minor conflict. I noticed that you have discussed having a shared
branch for me, Niels and Reni. This would be wise indeed as the danger of
us either working on the same thing or against each other is pretty b
