Re: [Geoserver-devel] service provider clarifications

e to do something useful with Java? > > > > -Jukka Rahkonen- > > > > *Lähettäjä:* Jody Garnett > *Lähetetty:* tiistai 16. helmikuuta 2021 21.30 > *Vastaanottaja:* Andrea Aime > *Kopio:* GeoServer > *Aihe:* Re: [Geoserver-devel] service provider clarifications

Re: [Geoserver-devel] service provider clarifications

: [Geoserver-devel] service provider clarifications Andrea: Thanks for the discussion in today's meeting, I was having a hard time balancing making community participation visible, and wanting to recommend service providers in position to directly contribute on behalf of their customers. I

Re: [Geoserver-devel] service provider clarifications

Andrea: Thanks for the discussion in today's meeting, I was having a hard time balancing making community participation visible, and wanting to recommend service providers in position to directly contribute on behalf of their customers. I have updated the page

Re: [Geoserver-devel] service provider clarifications

Hi Jody, I am confused now. GeoCursos is not a match for the criteria you cite in the GSIP (there is no mention of blogs, translations and docs, examples just talk about coding related activities), but then you create new criterias out of the blue. Either: - the extra criteria need to be added (and

Re: [Geoserver-devel] service provider clarifications

Yeah, this is what started the conversation - my expectations for experienced providers differ from practice. I tried to provide: - 4 criteria (do I have to list signed code contribution agreement, or is it covered by "demonstrate ability to contribute directly to the project?") - And then some ex

Re: [Geoserver-devel] service provider clarifications

ts.sourceforge.net>> Aihe: Re: [Geoserver-devel] service provider clarifications Here is a proposal: GSIP 199 Update commercial support categories<https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GISP-199> -- Jody Garnett On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 at 03:05, Andrea Aime mailto:andrea.a...@geo

Re: [Geoserver-devel] service provider clarifications

uld the new installer still requite 32 bit java because of the wrapper? > > > > -Jukka Rahkonen- > > > > *Lähettäjä:* Jody Garnett > *Lähetetty:* lauantai 13. helmikuuta 2021 2.24 > *Vastaanottaja:* Andrea Aime > *Kopio:* GeoServer > *Aihe:* Re: [Geoserver

Re: [Geoserver-devel] service provider clarifications

Hi, Would the new installer still requite 32 bit java because of the wrapper? -Jukka Rahkonen- Lähettäjä: Jody Garnett Lähetetty: lauantai 13. helmikuuta 2021 2.24 Vastaanottaja: Andrea Aime Kopio: GeoServer Aihe: Re: [Geoserver-devel] service provider clarifications Here is a proposal

Re: [Geoserver-devel] service provider clarifications

Hi Jody, quoting the experienced provider section from the proposal: * Demonstrate the ability to contribute directly to project sustainability: GISP proposal, community module, code-sprint participation * Signed code contribution agreement * Work on geoserver when hired by customers but are not a

Re: [Geoserver-devel] service provider clarifications

Here is a proposal: GSIP 199 Update commercial support categories -- Jody Garnett On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 at 03:05, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi Jody, > should we also require a minimum of user support activity, like either > user list of gis.stackex

Re: [Geoserver-devel] service provider clarifications

Hi Jody, should we also require a minimum of user support activity, like either user list of gis.stackexchange.com participation? Cheers Andrea On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 7:59 PM Jody Garnett wrote: > In today's meeting I learned that our service provider definitions are not > quite clear (and did

[Geoserver-devel] service provider clarifications

In today's meeting I learned that our service provider definitions are not quite clear (and did not match how I usually summarize the distinctions). My personal take is: - *core-contributors*: take on an ongoing responsibility (security responsible disclosure response, releases, supported extensi