Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geotools-gt2-users] CoordSys clause parsing support in MIF plugin

Mathieu Coudert ha scritto: > Hi Andrea, > Thanks for proposing this, > I'm very interested in picking it up as a maintainer. > Obviously, with the free cycles I'll have. Hey, this is great news (I did not notice your mail until Francois pointed me at it, sorry...). First step is to subscribe to

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-1709) MIFStringTokenizer can't read quote inside quoted string

MIFStringTokenizer can't read quote inside quoted string Key: GEOT-1709 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1709 Project: GeoTools Issue Type: Bug Components: data mif

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-1710) urn:ogc:def:crs:OGC:1.3:CRS84 is not recognized by the referencing subsystem

urn:ogc:def:crs:OGC:1.3:CRS84 is not recognized by the referencing subsystem Key: GEOT-1710 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1710 Project: GeoTools Issue T

[Geotools-devel] Coverages and spanning the antimeridian

Hi, I'm looking for a double check for an issue I have with the wcs 1.1.1 specification. The specification states that GetCoverage can be performed with a bbox that spans the antimeridian and defined like this: "A Bounding Box defined in a geographic CRS (or a WGS84BoundingBox) whose LowerCorner

Re: [Geotools-devel] Coverages and spanning the antimeridian

Andrea Aime ha scritto: > Consider a case where I have a grid coverage that spans -180,180 > longitude and a wcs requests asking for the bbox 175,10,-175,20. Ah, for added injury I will have to deal with a slightly more complex case as well. Say the original coverage does not span -180,180, but o

[Geotools-devel] FeatureAccess superclass for DataStore proposal kick off

Hi all, FYI, I'm going to start working on the implementation of the proposal to bring Feature to our DataStore API . This means I'll be introducing generics on the DataStore API and thus updating all the module

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Reopened: (GEOT-1701) FeatureAcess superclass for DataStore proposal follow up

[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gabriel Roldán reopened GEOT-1701: -- reopening to use it as the root issue to track progress over the implementation of the proposal > Featur

Re: [Geotools-devel] Coverages and spanning the antimeridian

Andrea Aime a écrit : > Now, given the axis order issues, I'll first have to determine > where longitude is. Looking at the code it seems the way is to > scan the coordinate system axis and look for the one whose > direction is EAST. Is that correct? Direction EAST or WEST apply also to ProjectedC

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposed Graph Extension Contribution

Hi there. Well. finally we've made up two classes: the AStarShortestPathFinder and the AStarIterator. It works in an analogous way that of Dijkstra. No original GeoTools code modified.Shall I send those to your personal emails? Best Regards Francisco -- View this message in context: http://www

[Geotools-devel] Not compiling pending modules

Hi guys, sending directly to you as you're the maintainers of the pending modules that does not compile: gml3, tile and ogr. I'd like to move them to the "archive" profile (that is, officially kick them out of the build) so I can have a compiling workspace including the pending modules to imple

Re: [Geotools-devel] Not compiling pending modules

Gabriel Roldán wrote: > Hi guys, > > sending directly to you as you're the maintainers of the pending modules that > does not compile: gml3, tile and ogr. > Yep I can fix tile up; or perhaps just return it to the uDig code base. Let me get back to you next week. > I'd like to move them to the

Re: [Geotools-devel] Not compiling pending modules

On Saturday 16 February 2008 02:23:29 am Jody Garnett wrote: > Gabriel Roldán wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > sending directly to you as you're the maintainers of the pending modules > > that does not compile: gml3, tile and ogr. > > Yep I can fix tile up; or perhaps just return it to the uDig code bas