Re: [Geotools-devel] How to turn off native support for PNG

2008-06-05 Thread Jody Garnett
Thanks Andrea; I am going to write that in a wiki before I forget again; I suppose it would be rude if the geotools image plugin did that for me? Jody > Jody Garnett ha scritto: >> Quick question for those who know more about JAI and ImageIO than me. >> We have found that the native DLLs (from J

Re: [Geotools-devel] How to turn off native support for PNG

2008-06-05 Thread Simone Giannecchini
go aaime go, go! :-) On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 11:47 PM, Andrea Aime <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jody Garnett ha scritto: >> Quick question for those who know more about JAI and ImageIO than me. We >> have found that the native DLLs (from JAI or ImageIO) mess up our >> ability to read certain PNG f

Re: [Geotools-devel] How to turn off native support for PNG

2008-06-05 Thread Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett ha scritto: > Quick question for those who know more about JAI and ImageIO than me. We > have found that the native DLLs (from JAI or ImageIO) mess up our > ability to read certain PNG files.. (such as obtained from this WMS > http://www.bsc-eoc.org/cgi-bin/bsc_ows.asp?version=1.1.1

Re: [Geotools-devel] Class Diagram For GPX2 Module and Development Plan

2008-06-05 Thread Jody Garnett
Well no need to update the diagram for me; just so long as it helped you think about what you are up to. Jody Sunburned Surveyor wrote: > I'll take some time to clarify the diagram based on your comments. > Thanks for taking the time to review it. (I almost feel like I'm a > Google SoC student for

[Geotools-devel] How to turn off native support for PNG

2008-06-05 Thread Jody Garnett
Quick question for those who know more about JAI and ImageIO than me. We have found that the native DLLs (from JAI or ImageIO) mess up our ability to read certain PNG files.. (such as obtained from this WMS http://www.bsc-eoc.org/cgi-bin/bsc_ows.asp?version=1.1.1&service=WMS&request=GetCapabilit

Re: [Geotools-devel] Class Diagram For GPX2 Module and Development Plan

2008-06-05 Thread Sunburned Surveyor
I'll take some time to clarify the diagram based on your comments. Thanks for taking the time to review it. (I almost feel like I'm a Google SoC student for GeoTools...) :] Landon On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Jody Garnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sunburned Surveyor wrote: >> >> I put toge

Re: [Geotools-devel] Inconsistencies in ReferencedEnvelope

2008-06-05 Thread Jody Garnett
Martin Desruisseaux wrote: > Jody Garnett a écrit : >>> ReferencedEnvelope reference(ReferencedEnvelope) >>> >>> Had no documentation, but looking at the code it the create a new >>> instance of ReferencedEnvelope inconditionnaly, given a non-null

Re: [Geotools-devel] Inconsistencies in ReferencedEnvelope

2008-06-05 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Jody Garnett a écrit : >> ReferencedEnvelope reference(ReferencedEnvelope) >> >> Had no documentation, but looking at the code it the create a new >> instance of ReferencedEnvelope inconditionnaly, given a non-null >> argument. >> > This is the

Re: [Geotools-devel] Class Diagram For GPX2 Module and Development Plan

2008-06-05 Thread Jody Garnett
Sunburned Surveyor wrote: > I put together a simple class diagram for the modul on my lunch break > today. It shows the basic structure of the module, and how data flows > from a GPX file to an eventual feature in OpenJUMP. (I imagine an > alternate GPXFeatureFactory class could be plugged that wou

Re: [Geotools-devel] Improving our SVN commit messages

2008-06-05 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Just to add in, something that gets me is batch commits with a single message. It too makes it confusing to figure out what has changed when the message contains something totally unrelated to the class. 2c. -Justin Adrian Custer wrote: > Hey all, > > I'm starting to read the commit log regul

Re: [Geotools-devel] Copyright Header work + NEW HEADER

2008-06-05 Thread Jody Garnett
Ohhh slam. Okay I deserve that one - nice working with you Adrian :-) Adrian Custer wrote: > Use the code, luke. > > The javadoc comment at the top has a full usage info. > --adrian > > - Check out the new SourceForge.net

Re: [Geotools-devel] Copyright Header work + NEW HEADER

2008-06-05 Thread Adrian Custer
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 10:42 -0700, Jody Garnett wrote: > Adrian Custer wrote: > > Hey all, > > > > If you svn up, you'll suffer patches to all of your metadata and > > referencing files. Both modules/library/metadata and > > modules/library/referencing should be clean as of revision 30521. There >

Re: [Geotools-devel] Online tests und fixtures

2008-06-05 Thread Jody Garnett
mcr wrote: > I am working at a new plugin: > http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Image+Mosaicing+Pyramidal+JDBC+Plugin > > Since I need online tests for postgis,mysql,db2 and oracle I need the > corresponding fixtures. > 1) Are there predefined fixtures? > I don't think so; I think you

Re: [Geotools-devel] Copyright Header work + NEW HEADER

2008-06-05 Thread Jody Garnett
Adrian Custer wrote: > Hey all, > > If you svn up, you'll suffer patches to all of your metadata and > referencing files. Both modules/library/metadata and > modules/library/referencing should be clean as of revision 30521. There > are only three outstanding issues as documented in the review.txt f

Re: [Geotools-devel] Improving our SVN commit messages

2008-06-05 Thread Jody Garnett
Adrian Custer wrote: > Hey all, > > I'm starting to read the commit log regularly due to my using mercurial > more and more often. You can see an example of what I read here: > http://hg.geomatys.fr/geotools/trunk/ > > As you can see, the commit messages lack specificity; it's hard to tell > wha

Re: [Geotools-devel] Avoiding Java Native Interface on GeoTools.

2008-06-05 Thread Jody Garnett
johann sorel wrote: > Hello, > We would like to start a discussion around JNI. > > As you have seen in the past months some work has be done on GDAL. > This work is great and can be useful to handle more raster formats, but > the problem is that GeoTools is getting tightly linked to those JNI > c

Re: [Geotools-devel] Inconsistencies in ReferencedEnvelope

2008-06-05 Thread Jody Garnett
Hi Martin the compiler caught me on this as well; when I updated to JDK 1.6.0_6. I am not really sure what to do about it; currently the code often does a cast in order to choose the right method. > I had a look (by accident) to ReferencedEnvelope. I noticed 3 "reference" > methods, which are in

Re: [Geotools-devel] going going gone; or how to kick the go module out of the build

2008-06-05 Thread Jody Garnett
johann sorel wrote: > hello, > > The go module is out of the build for a few weeks (perhaps months). Even so I was going to work on the SE functions with you and wanted to easily add it to my build; because of using comments (rather than profiles) I could not do this easily. > Most of the modules

[Geotools-devel] Online tests und fixtures

2008-06-05 Thread mcr
I am working at a new plugin: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Image+Mosaicing+Pyramidal+JDBC+Plugin Since I need online tests for postgis,mysql,db2 and oracle I need the corresponding fixtures. 1) Are there predefined fixtures ? 2) Since my configuration files are xml files and fix

[Geotools-devel] Copyright Header work + NEW HEADER

2008-06-05 Thread Adrian Custer
Hey all, If you svn up, you'll suffer patches to all of your metadata and referencing files. Both modules/library/metadata and modules/library/referencing should be clean as of revision 30521. There are only three outstanding issues as documented in the review.txt files. For those who are interes

Re: [Geotools-devel] Header work

2008-06-05 Thread Mauricio Pazos
On Thursday 05 June 2008 07:27:42 you wrote: > Mauricio Pazos wrote: > > On Wednesday 04 June 2008 21:32:56 Adrian Custer wrote: > >> Also there are two files > >> /modules/library/main/modified-src/org/geotools/filter/parser/Node.java > >> modules/library/main/modified-src/org/geotools/filter/pars

[Geotools-devel] Improving our SVN commit messages

2008-06-05 Thread Adrian Custer
Hey all, I'm starting to read the commit log regularly due to my using mercurial more and more often. You can see an example of what I read here: http://hg.geomatys.fr/geotools/trunk/ As you can see, the commit messages lack specificity; it's hard to tell what they were for since this info app