[Geotools-devel] New SVN Location, can we have a final decision (PMC vote required)

2008-11-19 Thread Jody Garnett
Hi everyone; I seem to have lost this thread with the change of email address. +1 For those following along at home - I had a couple of questions which andrea has been able to answer on IRC: Q: Who runs the svn respostiory for OSGeo A: FrankW and someone else Q: Is there any integration on

[Geotools-devel] toCQL WARNING THIS IS A WORK IN PROGRESS

2008-11-19 Thread Mauricio Pazos
Hi, in CQL class the toCQL method has this warning comment /** * WARNING THIS IS A WORK IN PROGRESS. * * @param filter * @return */ public static String toCQL( Filter filter ){ FilterToCQL toCQL = new FilterToCQL(); StringBuffer output =

Re: [Geotools-devel] Integrate Edigeo module into geotools project

2008-11-19 Thread Mathieu Coudert
Hi Justin, I wonder, have you tried to use it in GeoServer at all? It would be cool to create a GeoServer extension for it. I never tried it in Geoserver. Is there a way or a how to that I could have a look at? Thanks, Mathieu -Justin Mathieu Coudert wrote: Hi list, I would like

[Geotools-devel] GPX Support and Some Latitude/Longitude questions.

2008-11-19 Thread Sunburned Surveyor
I'll be testing my GPX plug-in live for OpenJUMP this week. When these tests are complete I'll load the latest version of my source code to the GeoTools SVN. I'll like need some help then including my GPX module in the build process for GeoTools. (I think there may need to be some sort of review

Re: [Geotools-devel] GML 3.2 bindings

2008-11-19 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Hi Rob, snip in essence, we need to decide if we care about supporting deprecated or removed stuff (an overly lax gml3.2), if so, what mechanism could we use to catch such exceptions. Without knowing a lot about the specifics, i would say yes. My rationale being things like

Re: [Geotools-devel] GPX Support and Some Latitude/Longitude questions.

2008-11-19 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Sunburned Surveyor a écrit : - Right now my code uses doubles to represent lat and long values. I'd like to create a convenient wrapper class to represent a lat/long coordinate (possible with an elevation). I noted that GeoTools has a latitude and longitude classes:

[Geotools-devel] javadocs for unsupported modules

2008-11-19 Thread Michael Bedward
Hi all, Just wondering how often do the online javadocs for unsupported modules (trunk) get refreshed ? I assumed it would be daily but some docs I added yesterday have not made it online yet. cheers Michael - This SF.Net

Re: [Geotools-devel] GPX Support and Some Latitude/Longitude questions.

2008-11-19 Thread Adrian Custer
Hey, Congrats on the hard work. It would be interesting to hear what you mean by testing your geotools code live from openjump since I've always thought those were very different projects. How does openjump deal with gps data, in plate-carre space? Sunburned Surveyor wrote: - Right now my

Re: [Geotools-devel] javadocs for unsupported modules

2008-11-19 Thread Adrian Custer
Michael Bedward wrote: Hi all, Just wondering how often do the online javadocs for unsupported modules (trunk) get refreshed ? I assumed it would be daily but some docs I added yesterday have not made it online yet. cheers Michael Building the javadocs for Geotools 2.x is black magic.

Re: [Geotools-devel] javadocs for unsupported modules

2008-11-19 Thread Michael Bedward
sounds scary :) thanks Adrian Building the javadocs for Geotools 2.x is black magic. You need java 6 and the right incantation so none of the automatic build tools has mastered it. From time to time someone succeeds and they get updated. It's one of the major reasons for Martin wanting to

Re: [Geotools-devel] GML3.2 refactor

2008-11-19 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Rob Atkinson wrote: Also, I couldnt find a binding for gml:name, so not sure how to add gml:identifier. What is supposed to be happening here - is it simply handled as a complex feature type generic binding? Rob, gml:name is a gml:CodeType; this is a complexType with simpleContent, so is

Re: [Geotools-devel] GML3.2 refactor

2008-11-19 Thread Rob Atkinson
So you are saying I should look at creating a gml:Name handler while I'm in the core of xsd-gml and have Justin's attention to review it? I will then have to back out the hack from app-schemas Rob On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rob Atkinson wrote:

Re: [Geotools-devel] GML3.2 refactor

2008-11-19 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
I am not sure if this is the right thing to do, until we have decided on a long-term solution for complexType-with-simpleContent, that is, how to accommodate it within GeoAPI. Is gml:identifier also a gml:CodeType? Rob Atkinson wrote: So you are saying I should look at creating a gml:Name