Christian Müller ha scritto:
> As far as I am concerned, I would try to enhance geotools to better support
> the INSPIRE EU directive.
I second this. Unfortunately helping in that direction requires very
significant amount of time, so up until OpenGeo decides to start
working on INSPIRE related
Simone Giannecchini ha scritto:
> Ciao Jody,
> as we are moving the gdal plugin to supported, I was thinking about
> actually reverting the mechanics of the switch.
>
> Right now you build with gdal only if explicitly requested, in the end
> I would like build with gdal by default (even though we
As far as I am concerned, I would try to enhance geotools to better support
the INSPIRE EU directive.
This directive is from the European Commission and all member states have to
build a national GDI using all these ISO, W3C and OGC standards. The time
frame ends with 2015, but many national p
Thanks for the encouragement.
Jody.
PS. See it is for encouraging others like this that makes us all think
highly of you :-D
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Michael Bedward
wrote:
> ...plus an enormous amount of work on the user guide etc.
>
> Michael
>
-
...plus an enormous amount of work on the user guide etc.
Michael
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_
Adrian and Andrea may be winding down their conversation on the subject
of the PSC; but there is one aspect of Adrian's message that still
captures my imagination. That of examination of my position and why I
have the time and interest to lead both the project and the community.
In short:
- I d
See http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/job/geotools-trunk/1288/changes
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_
Given that Jody is not going to be around for a number of hours I have
reverted the change. The build should be fixed momentarily.
Andrea Aime wrote:
> Hudson ha scritto:
>> See http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/job/geotools-trunk/1286/changes
>>
>> Changes:
>>
>> [jive] Add new MapLayer implement
Ciao Jody,
as we are moving the gdal plugin to supported, I was thinking about
actually reverting the mechanics of the switch.
Right now you build with gdal only if explicitly requested, in the end
I would like build with gdal by default (even though we might not ask
people to install the native l
See http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/job/geotools-trunk/1287/changes
Changes:
[aaime] GEOT-2294 Sql encoder is not provided with enough context when filter
uses an attribute which is not part of the returned feature type
[aaime] Commenting out debugging code
---
On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 11:43 +0100, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Adrian Custer ha scritto:
> > On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 10:17 +0100, Andrea Aime wrote:
> > ...
> >>> Adrian Custer ha scritto:
> How did you resolve the 'advertising clause' issue? Are we expecting to
> change all our docs to include th
Hey,
As usual you three have wise thoughts, so I'll keep hoping that somehow
this will all work out for the best and keep my more radical notions to
myself.
--adrian
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge C
Adrian Custer ha scritto:
> On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 10:17 +0100, Andrea Aime wrote:
> ...
>>> Adrian Custer ha scritto:
How did you resolve the 'advertising clause' issue? Are we expecting to
change all our docs to include the credit requested by SUN?
> ...
>> Reading into this GNU documen
On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 10:17 +0100, Andrea Aime wrote:
...
> > Adrian Custer ha scritto:
> >> How did you resolve the 'advertising clause' issue? Are we expecting to
> >> change all our docs to include the credit requested by SUN?
...
> Reading into this GNU document about the nature of the
> BSD i
Andrea Aime a écrit :
> I personally would be ok with adding a "any later version", but I
> would feel more comfortable with just switching explicitly to v3
> (provided v3 does not have other significant changes I'm not aware
> of, haven't really read it, just read articles talking about it).
I co
Martin Desruisseaux ha scritto:
> Adrian Custer a écrit :
>> Apache 2.0 is incompatible with the GPL v2.0. Indeed, a major motivation
>> of GPLv3.0 was to allow the integration of Apache and GNU code. GPLv3 is
>> compatible with Apache 2.0. Unfortunately, I don't remember any of the
>> details so I
Adrian Custer a écrit :
> Apache 2.0 is incompatible with the GPL v2.0. Indeed, a major motivation
> of GPLv3.0 was to allow the integration of Apache and GNU code. GPLv3 is
> compatible with Apache 2.0. Unfortunately, I don't remember any of the
> details so I don't know how this affects the LGPL
Provide a non prepared statement option for Oracle
--
Key: GEOT-2295
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2295
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: data oraclesp
Sql encoder is not provided with enough context when filter uses an attribute
which is not part of the returned feature type
Key: GEOT-2294
Andrea Aime ha scritto:
> Adrian Custer ha scritto:
>> Simone,
>> thanks for the update.
>> On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 20:22 +0100, Simone Giannecchini wrote:
>>> the only real problem, the
>>> licensing problem seems to be addressed as of now (see my previous
>>> email).
>>
>> How did you resolve the '
Christian Müller ha scritto:
> Following the discussion about licensing problems causes me to ask a further
> question.
>
> I am thinking about impelementing the GeoXACML specification for geotools as
> GSOC 2009 project.
>
> http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/geoxacml
>
> This is a ge
Saw the email, will respond there.
Ciao,
Simone.
---
Ing. Simone Giannecchini
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Owner - Software Engineer
Via Carignoni 51
55041 Camaiore (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584983027
fax: +39 0584983027
mob:+39 333 8128928
http
Hudson ha scritto:
> See http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/job/geotools-trunk/1286/changes
>
> Changes:
>
> [jive] Add new MapLayer implementation rather than trying to patch the umber
> default implementation, see GEOT-2271
Jody, it seems you forgot to commit a file there.
I'm going to wait a f
Adrian Custer ha scritto:
...
> So that is my 'thinking lately'. This is not yet a formal call for no
> leadership or new leadership but a response to you about my feelings on
> the subject.
>
> Regardless of your perspective on that particular issue, the fact that I
> am even raising the suggest
See http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/job/geotools-trunk/1286/changes
Changes:
[jive] Add new MapLayer implementation rather than trying to patch the umber
default implementation, see GEOT-2271
--
[...truncated 5432 lines...]
[INFO] Building WFS client mod
25 matches
Mail list logo
