Andrea Aime wrote:
> Jody Garnett ha scritto:
>> So the alternative to "any" is "all" - what would be the consequence
>> of rendering all geometry?
>
> Complete, utter nonsense? ;-)
Indeed. Even for simple features you could have, for example, the
location of a measuring instrument as one proper
Hi,
I was making a conversation on IRC and it occurred to me that,
apparently, we don't have such great support for sparse coverages,
that is, a coverage whose single, general envelope covers a large
area, but whose data covers only a small subset of it.
The WCS DescribeCoverage seems to support
See http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/job/geotools-trunk/1708/changes
Changes:
[aaime] New unsupported epsg-h2 module
--
[...truncated 11167 lines...]
[INFO] [compiler:testCompile]
[INFO] Compiling 5 source files to
http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/job/geo
WFS DataStore parsing dates
---
Key: GEOT-2553
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2553
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type: Bug
Components: data wfs
Affects Versions: 2.5.5
Reporter: Antonio
Ciao Andrea,
don't worry, I don't think you should create a proposal for this.
Simone.
---
Ing. Simone Giannecchini
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Owner - Software Engineer
Via Carignoni 51
55041 Camaiore (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584983027
fax: +39 058
See http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/job/geotools-trunk/1709/changes
--
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited
royalty-free distribution o
ImageMosaic should respect the requested interpolation
--
Key: GEOT-2554
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2554
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: gc im
Hi,
I've been working a bit more on the user map comparison that's
preventing me from committing the 3d work.
Basically, I want retyping to work when the user map is different,
but the retyping wrappers do no take into account the user maps
when checking for types equality and blow up with an exce
Hi,
I was thinking about trunk and I'm wondering if there is
anything still missing in order to graduate jdbc-ng and
push down the old jdbc datastores in unsupported land
for a release cycle?
The full list of issues against jdbc-ng is here:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset
I have been waiting for this mail a long time :-)
I was not sure because there are a lot of jira issues but +1 !! in any
case.
For the db2 side, the issues left are additional features (blob, aggregate
functions, partial 3d support,).
Andrea Aime writes:
> Hi,
> I was think
Christian Müller ha scritto:
> I have been waiting for this mail a long time :-)
> I was not sure because there are a lot of jira issues but +1 !! in
> any case.
Yeah, lots of jiras indeed, yet if you wait to release software without
any bugs or missing feature you'll release it... never.
F
I am waiting on:
- patch for events (and justin is waiting on me to make him a test
case? showing a design problem I found - two commits are issued if you
have two datastores on the same transaction; rather than one)
- aggregation support; I had something but I killed it due to the
amount of duplic
Hi Andrea:
That approach works for me; however I am a bit worried that the check
will be fragile.
Could the method be phrased as:
FeatureTypes.equals( type1, type2, keys )
And only the user map keys mentioned would be involved in the
comparison? This would allow you to exactly represent the chec
Emily has taken this one up (and may not of updated the pom.xml file yet?)
Jody
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Christian
Müller wrote:
>
> The problem here is that the module builds with SUN SDK 6 and IBM SDK 5, but
> not with IBM SDK 6.
>
> Executing the tests individually within eclipse and
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
Hi Andrea:
That approach works for me; however I am a bit worried that the check
will be fragile.
Could the method be phrased as:
FeatureTypes.equals( type1, type2, keys )
And only the user map keys mentioned would be involved in the
comparison? This would allow you to
Hi Andrea:
I am catching up on email - please excuse the long delay.
> Tthe descriptor user map is mutable. Is this expected?
yes. It is a scatch pad that can be used to record notes. The goal is
to keep applications holding on to many Map
instances (which I have seen enough times to scare me).
Brining this thread back into focus.
Unless there are more concrete objection to the patch I would like to
apply it, because it is a regression. The behavior was until recently to
map "" to any geometry, and now that is not the case.
Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> Andrea Aime wrote:
>> Jody Garnet
+1, I think it is a great idea, something I have thought of before as
well. Currently #2 on my builder list right after a concise geometry
builder :).
-Justin
Andrea Aime wrote:
> Hi all,
> many years ago pissed off by how hard it was to build
> styles with code I created the StyleBuilder we ha
Makes sense to me. What about calling it equalsExact(), might keep the
door open for other properties in the future. No preference though.
Andrea Aime wrote:
> Hi,
> I've been working a bit more on the user map comparison that's
> preventing me from committing the 3d work.
>
> Basically, I want
I think a lot of open jiras is a good sign... that the datastore is
actually used :). But I agree, and would be up for a ticket triage in
jdbc-ng to cut those number of issues down.
Andrea Aime wrote:
> Christian Müller ha scritto:
>> I have been waiting for this mail a long time :-)
>> I was no
Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
> Makes sense to me. What about calling it equalsExact(), might keep the
> door open for other properties in the future. No preference though.
If you look at the patch I've sent to Jody's mail in the same thread
you'll the the property has to percolate down to the at
Andrea Aime wrote:
> Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
>> Makes sense to me. What about calling it equalsExact(), might keep the
>> door open for other properties in the future. No preference though.
>
> If you look at the patch I've sent to Jody's mail in the same thread
> you'll the the property ha
Jody Garnett wrote:
> I am waiting on:
> - patch for events (and justin is waiting on me to make him a test
> case? showing a design problem I found - two commits are issued if you
> have two datastores on the same transaction; rather than one)
The event patch has been comitted. The double commit i
> The solution suggested in the thread was to make a factory
> that can bear multiple algorithms. I see two paths ahead:
> - change the whole ProcessFactory definition so that
>it returns a list of process names, and takes a name
>parameter in each call (api break)
> - create a new Composi
Jody is right, I am the maintainer of this. I have updated the pom file
but I'm not sure about the readme.
I will try to see if I can reproduce the problem and let you know what I
find.
Emily
Jody Garnett wrote:
> Emily has taken this one up (and may not of updated the pom.xml file yet?)
>
>
Jody,
I hear you; I don't want to implement a solution that doesn't really
solve the problem either.
So here is my test case. This test case fails.
public void testMyTest() {
FilterFactory2 ff = CommonFactoryFinder.getFilterFactory2(null);
Filter f = ff.less(ff.literal(1), ff.literal(1.5
I would go with the first for the same reasons already listed. The API
was looking for feedback from others on how it would be used, so it's
not really nailed down.
While I'm listed as the maintainer of this module, no major work has
been done in it for about year. I don't think many people a
2009/6/16 Graham Davis wrote:
> While I'm listed as the maintainer of this module, no major work has
> been done in it for about year. I don't think many people are using
> this API yet so changing it to improve it probably won't affect many people.
>
Except me :-)
I've been (very slowly) workin
Hi Andrea:
I did try and reply to your email with a suggestion that I think is
worth while; I will look for you online later today.
Thanks for the excellent work on this one.
Jody
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 2:14 AM, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Andrea Aime ha scritto:
>> Hi all,
>> if anybody wants to rev
Thanks, Emily - that is indeed an interesting case that was missed in testing.
Jody
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Emily Gouge wrote:
> I'm creating Quantile breaks in uDig on a shapefile with five features
> numbered 1-5. Since I'm asking for 5 "bins" I'm getting one item in
> each bin. The Q
I will look over the code; I was not aware that the retyper was not
aware of what it was doing; I thought we were going to explicitly ask
it to look out for a few keys that mean something to the library.
Looks like the code you are working on is here:
protected AttributeDescriptor[] typeAttribute
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> I will look over the code; I was not aware that the retyper was not
> aware of what it was doing; I thought we were going to explicitly ask
> it to look out for a few keys that mean something to the library.
I'm missing how this can be any manageable in the long term.
>
32 matches
Mail list logo
